Overclock.net - Overclocking.net
     
 
Home Gallery Reviews Blogs Register Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Members List


Go Back   Overclock.net - Overclocking.net > Components > Hard Drives & Storage > RAID Controllers and Software

Reply
LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 04-03-09   #2001 (permalink)
Audiophile
 
xToaDx's Avatar
 
amd nvidia

Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Tucson
Posts: 2,498

Rep: 236 xToaDx is acknowledged by manyxToaDx is acknowledged by manyxToaDx is acknowledged by many
Unique Rep: 192
Trader Rating: 70
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by SockMan! View Post
Go to the Dell support page for the PowerEdge 1900 server. You'll find Server 2008 x64 drivers for the Perc 5/i that'll work in Vista x64. Note that these drivers will work even if you flashed your Perc with LSI firmware.
It says that they're not signed, so Vista won't load them.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by TheSandman View Post
And I also noticed most of the people here that have a problem are european well sorry my kids arn't growing up to be communists
Quote:
Originally Posted by TraCbr600 View Post
Has anyone really been far as decided to use even go want to do look more like?

System: :D
CPU
AMD Athlon 64 X2 4000+
Motherboard
EVGA 590 SLi
Memory
2x2 mushkin
Graphics Card
XFX 8800GT Alpha Dog
Hard Drive
1TB Samsung F1
Sound Card
Creative XtremeMusic
Power Supply
OCZ 500w
Case
Cooler Master Elite 310
CPU cooling
Stock
GPU cooling
Stock
OS
Windows Vista x64
Monitor
Acer 19''
xToaDx is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-03-09   #2002 (permalink)
New to Overclock.net
 
intel nvidia

Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 128

Rep: 6 RobiNet Unknown
Unique Rep: 6
Trader Rating: 0
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by the_beast
Looking at the first post which has ICH9R vs PERC benchmarks, I imagine your performance will go up slightly, but maybe not enough to notice. Your 120GB drives are pretty slow anyway, so the boost from the PERC might not give you much extra speed. I think you really need some new drives to make the increase worthwhile.

Honestly, if I wasn't going to be using the PERC for a 4 drive RAID 6 array in addition to my SAS drives, I wouldn't have bought it (or the drives). When I need to expand my storage beyond 4 drives I will remove the SAS drives and go back to SATA OS drives.

As for 512MB cache - if you need to replace the memory, get a 512MB stick. If not, stick with the stock 256MB as you will likely not notice the difference.
so if cache - 256MB or 512MB - gives nothing - why everybody use PERC controlers ?

I thought, that when I'll move my system to hardware raid + cache - and I don't work with many large files - only system + 5-50 MB of my files - I thought that it will fit in cache - and whole system will be very fast ...

Quote:
Originally Posted by the_beast
Hope this helps
thank you
__________________
System: My System
CPU
Q6600
Motherboard
ASUS P5Q-E
Memory
8GB - 2x OCZ2RPR800C44GK
Graphics Card
8800GTS 320
Hard Drive
5x ST336754SS 36.7GB SAS 15K 8MB
Case
Antec 1200
OS
Vista Home Premium 64bit
Monitor
2x Dell 2407WFP-HC
RobiNet is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-03-09   #2003 (permalink)
Mobo Master
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: London, UK
Posts: 1,048

Rep: 145 the_beast is acknowledged by manythe_beast is acknowledged by many
Unique Rep: 100
Trader Rating: 0
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by RobiNet View Post
so if cache - 256MB or 512MB - gives nothing - why everybody use PERC controlers ?

I thought, that when I'll move my system to hardware raid + cache - and I don't work with many large files - only system + 5-50 MB of my files - I thought that it will fit in cache - and whole system will be very fast ...
It's not that cache gives nothing - it is very important. But the change from 256->512 isn't really so important (according to the benches that have been posted here). I wouldn't recommend changing a working 256MB stick to a 512MB for normal desktop use, as it will give little benefit.

Cache is very good for helping with lots of small, random writes because they all go straight to the controller cache. But it doesn't really helps reads, and it does nothing for sustained throughput. Depending on your usage, you may see a great benefit, you may see nothing at all.

I know I sound like a bit of a salesperson here, but if you want a big boost of speed for a small drive, SSD is the way to go. If you needed a larger fast drive, SAS + PERC would be ideal. For really fast storage you can combine a RAID card with a couple of SSDs or a lot of SAS drives. But that gets expensive.

The point is - don't buy 8 of the cheap, old generation SAS drives, as the speed increase you will get won't be the most cost effective use of you money. If you have $400 to spend (as per your examples), the fastest disk would be 2 60GB Vertex drives or 1 Intel SLC drive on your motherboard controller. The next best thing would probably be a PERC and 4 of the fastest disks you can afford (maybe the 640GB WD drives?). If you only want to spend $100, get the PERC, put your current disks on it, and enjoy a slight boost.

As for the PERC - the reason people use them is the price on eBay - they are dirt cheap compared with all other hardware RAID cards. They aren't the best performing cards by any means and, like any other RAID card, they can't work miracles with crappy disks. But they allow you to strap several slower disks together to give something reasonably fast or to give some redundancy. And, because they are true hardware RAID the stability and features offered for RAID 5 is much better than any onboard fakeraid solution.

Last edited by the_beast : 04-03-09 at 01:32 PM
the_beast is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 04-03-09   #2004 (permalink)
4.0 GHz
 
DJZeratul's Avatar
 
intel ati

Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: San Diego, CA
Posts: 1,809

Rep: 199 DJZeratul is acknowledged by manyDJZeratul is acknowledged by many
Unique Rep: 159
Trader Rating: 3
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by xToaDx View Post
It says that they're not signed, so Vista won't load them.
They loaded okay for me
__________________

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mitch Hedburg
I don't have a microwave oven, but I do have a clock that occasionally cooks stuff.

System: Killah Bawx VI: i7 Edition
CPU
Core i7 920 @ 4.0 GHz
Motherboard
ASUS P6T Deluxe
Memory
3x2GB Corsair Dominator DDR3-1600
Graphics Card
2 4870X2 Quad CFX
Hard Drive
Intel: 5x750GB 7200.10, PERC 6/i: 8x1TB Cav. Black
Sound Card
SoundMAX 7.1->DAC & HD4870x2->HDMI->7.1 Receiver
Power Supply
Antec TruPower Quattro 1KW, Ultra 500W for 8x RAID
Case
Custom Fabricated 18" cube (Mountain Mods UFO)
CPU cooling
Cooler Master V8 w/ SilverStone Fan
GPU cooling
Stock Diamond Cooler
OS
Windows 7 x64 Ultimate
Monitor
Dell 2407FPW + Optoma HD70 720p Projector
DJZeratul is offline DJZeratul's Gallery   Reply With Quote
Old 04-03-09   #2005 (permalink)
66MHz
 
Manyak's Avatar
 
intel ati

Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 7,068

Rep: 654 Manyak is becoming famousManyak is becoming famousManyak is becoming famousManyak is becoming famousManyak is becoming famousManyak is becoming famous
Unique Rep: 430
Folding Team Rank: 427
Trader Rating: 31
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by the_beast View Post
It's not that cache gives nothing - it is very important. But the change from 256->512 isn't really so important (according to the benches that have been posted here). I wouldn't recommend changing a working 256MB stick to a 512MB for normal desktop use, as it will give little benefit.

Cache is very good for helping with lots of small, random writes because they all go straight to the controller cache. But it doesn't really helps reads, and it does nothing for sustained throughput. Depending on your usage, you may see a great benefit, you may see nothing at all.
That's not entirely true. Cache is actually very helpful when dealing with large files.

Lets use some numbers that are easy to work with here - say you wanted to copy a 1GB file from array A (500MB/s read) to array B (100MB/s write). If it was a straight copy (no cache), it would be limited by the write speed and therefore take 10 seconds. If you have 256MB cache, the first 768MB would take 7.6 sec, and by the time that much has been transferred the cache will hold the last 256MB that was read from the drive. So you just 'saved' 2.4 sec. If you have 512MB cache, then you only have to wait on the first 512MB, which takes 5.1 sec. Saving you another 2.5 sec.

System: Obsidian Phoenix
CPU
Ci7 920 D0
Motherboard
E760 Classified
Memory
12GB G.Skill Titan DDR3-2000
Graphics Card
Waiting for HD5870x2
Hard Drive
1x Intel G2, 4x Intel G2, 1x Scorpio Black 320GB
Sound Card
Xonar D2X
Power Supply
Corsair 1000HX
Case
Corsair Obsidian 800D
CPU cooling
Heatkiller 3.0 Copper
OS
Windows 7 Ultimate
Monitor
3x Sony GDM-FW900 24" CRT's
Manyak is offline I fold for Overclock.net Overclocked Account   Reply With Quote
Old 04-03-09   #2006 (permalink)
King of the Undernet
 
Inuyasha1771's Avatar
 
intel nvidia

Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Waterbury center, Vermont
Posts: 1,543

Rep: 131 Inuyasha1771 is acknowledged by manyInuyasha1771 is acknowledged by many
Unique Rep: 103
Hardware Reviews: 17
Trader Rating: 24
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by DJZeratul View Post
They loaded okay for me

Good to know, not that it helps us a lot
__________________
Originally Posted by VCheeZ
That mix of Zotac cooler and blue pcb is the ugliest thing I have ever witnessed that was not made by Gigabyte.[/quote]


http://www.overclock.net/mobile-comp...-2000-obo.html Alienware M17x $2000 OBO!!!

System: Undernet Server
CPU
Q6700 @ 3.75 GHZ
Motherboard
EVGA Nvidia 680i A1
Memory
8 GB Mushkin DDR2
Graphics Card
2x 8800GTS
Hard Drive
300 GB Velociraptor
Sound Card
Onboard
Power Supply
TX800 Corsair
Case
ABS Monolith
CPU cooling
T.R.U.E black lapped
OS
Vista x64
Monitor
20 inch ACER
1 Million+ Folding at Home points
Inuyasha1771 is offline Overclocked Account   Reply With Quote
Old 04-03-09   #2007 (permalink)
4.0 GHz
 
DJZeratul's Avatar
 
intel ati

Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: San Diego, CA
Posts: 1,809

Rep: 199 DJZeratul is acknowledged by manyDJZeratul is acknowledged by many
Unique Rep: 159
Trader Rating: 3
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Inuyasha1771 View Post
Good to know, not that it helps us a lot
I actually haven't had any issues loading these unsigned drivers on x64... As long as they are 64 bit drivers they go fine, it just gives me the red message that the driver is not signed, I say install anyway and it goes.

As for installing Vista onto an array and using unsigned drivers, I am not sure. I havent evever installed vista to an array on the 6/i
__________________

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mitch Hedburg
I don't have a microwave oven, but I do have a clock that occasionally cooks stuff.

System: Killah Bawx VI: i7 Edition
CPU
Core i7 920 @ 4.0 GHz
Motherboard
ASUS P6T Deluxe
Memory
3x2GB Corsair Dominator DDR3-1600
Graphics Card
2 4870X2 Quad CFX
Hard Drive
Intel: 5x750GB 7200.10, PERC 6/i: 8x1TB Cav. Black
Sound Card
SoundMAX 7.1->DAC & HD4870x2->HDMI->7.1 Receiver
Power Supply
Antec TruPower Quattro 1KW, Ultra 500W for 8x RAID
Case
Custom Fabricated 18" cube (Mountain Mods UFO)
CPU cooling
Cooler Master V8 w/ SilverStone Fan
GPU cooling
Stock Diamond Cooler
OS
Windows 7 x64 Ultimate
Monitor
Dell 2407FPW + Optoma HD70 720p Projector

Last edited by DJZeratul : 04-03-09 at 07:22 PM
DJZeratul is offline DJZeratul's Gallery   Reply With Quote
Old 04-03-09   #2008 (permalink)
New to Overclock.net
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 4

Rep: 0 Couchinator Unknown
Unique Rep: 0
Trader Rating: 0
Default BIOS Corruption

I decided to get one of these for my file server. I bought one from eBay, and installed it (my mobo is a nForce 3600 Tyan dual socket 1207). I then found that my system did not start, even after I took out the PERC. After a long investigation I found out the BIOS chip on the mobo was fried. I had never seen this happen before. I replaced the BIOS chip and the PERC, as it didn't work in any other systems either (although it didn't cause any damage). I tried my new PERC and it did the SAME THING! the BIOS chip was fried.

Has this happened to anyone else? I'm just about to give up on the PERC if it's going to damage my other hardware!
Couchinator is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-04-09   #2009 (permalink)
4.0 GHz
 
DJZeratul's Avatar
 
intel ati

Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: San Diego, CA
Posts: 1,809

Rep: 199 DJZeratul is acknowledged by manyDJZeratul is acknowledged by many
Unique Rep: 159
Trader Rating: 3
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Couchinator View Post
I decided to get one of these for my file server. I bought one from eBay, and installed it (my mobo is a nForce 3600 Tyan dual socket 1207). I then found that my system did not start, even after I took out the PERC. After a long investigation I found out the BIOS chip on the mobo was fried. I had never seen this happen before. I replaced the BIOS chip and the PERC, as it didn't work in any other systems either (although it didn't cause any damage). I tried my new PERC and it did the SAME THING! the BIOS chip was fried.

Has this happened to anyone else? I'm just about to give up on the PERC if it's going to damage my other hardware!
Man I hate to hear this... I am sorry that you've had so much trouble.

This is definitely not something that happens with these cards, at least i havent heard anyone have this issue before. Considering you tried 2 completely different PERC cards, it makes me want to say maybe its the motherboard or the PCI-E slot.

Which board do you have (model)? I think some of those Tyan 1207 boards already have an 8 port LSI SAS controller on them, which could cause issues with the SMBus...
__________________

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mitch Hedburg
I don't have a microwave oven, but I do have a clock that occasionally cooks stuff.

System: Killah Bawx VI: i7 Edition
CPU
Core i7 920 @ 4.0 GHz
Motherboard
ASUS P6T Deluxe
Memory
3x2GB Corsair Dominator DDR3-1600
Graphics Card
2 4870X2 Quad CFX
Hard Drive
Intel: 5x750GB 7200.10, PERC 6/i: 8x1TB Cav. Black
Sound Card
SoundMAX 7.1->DAC & HD4870x2->HDMI->7.1 Receiver
Power Supply
Antec TruPower Quattro 1KW, Ultra 500W for 8x RAID
Case
Custom Fabricated 18" cube (Mountain Mods UFO)
CPU cooling
Cooler Master V8 w/ SilverStone Fan
GPU cooling
Stock Diamond Cooler
OS
Windows 7 x64 Ultimate
Monitor
Dell 2407FPW + Optoma HD70 720p Projector
DJZeratul is offline DJZeratul's Gallery   Reply With Quote
Old 04-04-09   #2010 (permalink)
4.0 GHz
 
DJZeratul's Avatar
 
intel ati

Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: San Diego, CA
Posts: 1,809

Rep: 199 DJZeratul is acknowledged by manyDJZeratul is acknowledged by many
Unique Rep: 159
Trader Rating: 3
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Inuyasha1771 View Post
Good to know, not that it helps us a lot
xToaDx's issue was BIOS related... After reading about utnorris' BIOS flash in this thread, he flashed to a new BIOS and it ended up working. Sometimes its a specific BIOS revision that causes an issue, so if flashing forward doesnt work, try flashing backwards (as was the case with utnorris' bloodrage, going back a revision worked).

It seems as if most Code 10 errors in windows that do not allow disk arrays to show up to either the Vista Installer or an already installed OS have all been BIOS related, so that is my recommended FIRST STEP to try for all of you that think they may have tried everything and don't have a clue as to why its not working on their motherboard.
__________________

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mitch Hedburg
I don't have a microwave oven, but I do have a clock that occasionally cooks stuff.

System: Killah Bawx VI: i7 Edition
CPU
Core i7 920 @ 4.0 GHz
Motherboard
ASUS P6T Deluxe
Memory
3x2GB Corsair Dominator DDR3-1600
Graphics Card
2 4870X2 Quad CFX
Hard Drive
Intel: 5x750GB 7200.10, PERC 6/i: 8x1TB Cav. Black
Sound Card
SoundMAX 7.1->DAC & HD4870x2->HDMI->7.1 Receiver
Power Supply
Antec TruPower Quattro 1KW, Ultra 500W for 8x RAID
Case
Custom Fabricated 18" cube (Mountain Mods UFO)
CPU cooling
Cooler Master V8 w/ SilverStone Fan
GPU cooling
Stock Diamond Cooler
OS
Windows 7 x64 Ultimate
Monitor
Dell 2407FPW + Optoma HD70 720p Projector

Last edited by DJZeratul : 04-04-09 at 07:22 AM
DJZeratul is offline DJZeratul's Gallery   Reply With Quote
Reply

Tags
perc, raid, raid card


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 8 (3 members and 5 guests)
binormalkilla, cartman123, Chranny
Thread Tools



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:02 AM.


Overclock.net is a Carbon Neutral Site Creative Commons License

Terms of Service / Forum Rules | Privacy Policy | DMCA Info | Advertising | Become an Official Vendor
Copyright © 2009 Shogun Interactive Development. Most rights reserved.
Page generated in 0.15087 seconds with 9 queries