Overclock.net - Overclocking.net
     
 
Home Gallery Reviews Blogs Register Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Members List


Go Back   Overclock.net - Overclocking.net > Components > Hard Drives & Storage > RAID Controllers and Software

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 04-23-09   #2261 (permalink)
*cough* Stock *cough*
 
clubhouse's Avatar
 
intel ati

Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: London UK
Posts: 20

Rep: 2 clubhouse Unknown
Unique Rep: 2
Trader Rating: 0
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by RobiNet View Post
my results - 4x 160GB - Hitachi HDS721616PLA380, 7200RPM, 8MB cache, old drives ...

[...]

so ... if you have 4x 300GB sas drives 15k RPM ... you SHOULD have better results ...
.
Indeed, I thought the RAID5 results would look great, but I was a bit badly surprised. Apart from the Access Time that is still very low, the other figures are surprising to me. Should I blame the ARA? or HDTune?

Anyway, I managed to hook up an old hard drive and I am right now running a new set of read/write tests with the RAID volume being unpartitioned. I will post them as soon as I am done with all RAID10 and RAID5
__________________
System: i7 Love Fest
CPU
Core i7 920
Motherboard
Asus P6T WS Pro
Memory
Corsair Dominator 6Gb DDR3-1600
Graphics Card
Asus EAH4350 fanless
Hard Drive
Perc5i + 4x300 Gb SAS Seagate Cheetah 15k.6
Power Supply
Silverstone NightJar ST45NF fanless
Case
LianLi PC-V2110B
OS
Vista Ultimate x64
Monitor
Dell S2309W
clubhouse is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-23-09   #2262 (permalink)
New to Overclock.net
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 16

Rep: 0 briarbiz Unknown
Unique Rep: 0
Trader Rating: 0
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by rampage101 View Post
briarbiz: are you able to try a different motherboard? Do you have anyone near you?
Rampage:
Yeah, I have a Dimension 9200, I was thinking in that direction too. I'll give it a shot... thanks.
briarbiz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-23-09   #2263 (permalink)
New to Overclock.net
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 4

Rep: 0 gmitch64 Unknown
Unique Rep: 0
Trader Rating: 0
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by briarbiz View Post
OK, double checked pin mod... still no post. It shows in windows, but not in boot...
I have the same issue on my board too.... Seems to be working fine in Windows tho... Hopefully this weekend I'll get linux installed on the box and see how it performs.


G
gmitch64 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-23-09   #2264 (permalink)
Case Modder
 
ounderfla69's Avatar
 
intel nvidia

Join Date: May 2008
Location: Palm Coast/Jacksonville
Posts: 780

Rep: 80 ounderfla69 is acknowledged by some
Unique Rep: 76
Trader Rating: 6
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by briarbiz View Post
OK, so I removed the RAM and then cold booted. Got an error message from the perc5i about ram removal. So I thought perhaps I had a bad dimm...

Then I plugged in my BBU and no error came up.

Is there a command to enter into the perc bios? I get no display whatsoever from it on boot...
You can see the card in Windows, have you tried to install Megaraid manager? There is a setting the bios that allows you to no boot on the card. Is your card new or used? Maybe it could have been set to no boot. I was going to try but I dont know how to set it back after I do it.

System: BENDER
CPU
I7 920 D0
Motherboard
EVGA SLI 758
Memory
4GB Gskill DDR3 1600
Graphics Card
XFX 8800GT
Hard Drive
2 WD 250GB Raid 0
Power Supply
Corsair HX750
Case
Corsair D800
CPU cooling
Corsair H50
OS
Windows 7 Professional
Monitor
HP 2207
ounderfla69 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-24-09   #2265 (permalink)
Mobo Master
 
Bonz™'s Avatar
 
intel nvidia

Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Ohio, USA
Posts: 1,954
Blog Entries: 3

Rep: 168 Bonz™ is acknowledged by manyBonz™ is acknowledged by many
Unique Rep: 142
Folding Team Rank: 142
Hardware Reviews: 5
Trader Rating: 21
Default

Ok so I added a 1TB to my 5x1TB RAID5. It took about 48 hours to add it, and now it's been background initializing for about 15 hours and is 55% done. I would think that after it was done rebuilding the array that I can see the extra 1TB of space... but it's still showing 3.63TB instead of 4.55TB. Do I have to wait for it to finish initializing? I wouldn't think so... anyone know?
__________________
Bonz::Asmodian Templar of Zikel

Total Available Storage
Currently: 8,377 GB (useable)


System: BonzTM
CPU
Q6600
Motherboard
Gigabyte G41-ES2L
Memory
4GB DDR2-800
Graphics Card
BFG GTX260 MaxCore
Hard Drive
WD 3x500GB R0
Power Supply
Silverstone DA750
Case
Antec Mini P180
CPU cooling
Xiggy Dark Knight
GPU cooling
Stock
OS
Windows 7 x64
Monitor
2x Asus 21.5" 1080p
Overclock.net - 2009 Chimp Challenge Champions 1 Million+ Folding at Home points
Bonz™ is offline I fold for Overclock.net Bonz™'s Gallery   Reply With Quote
Old 04-24-09   #2266 (permalink)
*cough* Stock *cough*
 
clubhouse's Avatar
 
intel ati

Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: London UK
Posts: 20

Rep: 2 clubhouse Unknown
Unique Rep: 2
Trader Rating: 0
Arrow Here you go...

Quote:
Originally Posted by clubhouse View Post
Anyway, I managed to hook up an old hard drive and I am right now running a new set of read/write tests with the RAID volume being unpartitioned. I will post them as soon as I am done with all RAID10 and RAID5
OK folks... after 24 hours of running tests, here are the results! Surprisingly, they are very different from what I ran before, as this time I used a separate hard drive to run HDTune from. The RAID volume was unpartitioned for each test, so I was also able to run write tests.

Not so surprisingly, RAID5 beats RAID10 indeed, as suggested by RobiNet previously. But now I am a bit confused... Should I really go with RAID5 and a strip size of 128k for a workstation that I will use for standard office work, running Vista x64? Any suggestions welcome...

EDIT: I attached all the results screenshots from HDTune, as well as a results.zip containing the Excel file with all tables and charts.

Please note that I was not able to run write tests at 32k block size, as HDTune was crashing

Comments welcome!



Attached Files
File Type: zip results_screenshots.zip (3.00 MB, 25 views)
File Type: zip results.zip (24.0 KB, 16 views)
__________________
My benchmarks for different RAID5 and RAID10 configs on my system: read | write

System: i7 Love Fest
CPU
Core i7 920
Motherboard
Asus P6T WS Pro
Memory
Corsair Dominator 6Gb DDR3-1600
Graphics Card
Asus EAH4350 fanless
Hard Drive
Perc5i + 4x300 Gb SAS Seagate Cheetah 15k.6
Power Supply
Silverstone NightJar ST45NF fanless
Case
LianLi PC-V2110B
OS
Vista Ultimate x64
Monitor
Dell S2309W

Last edited by clubhouse : 04-24-09 at 09:42 AM
clubhouse is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-24-09   #2267 (permalink)
Mobo Master
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: London, UK
Posts: 1,071

Rep: 147 the_beast is acknowledged by manythe_beast is acknowledged by many
Unique Rep: 101
Trader Rating: 0
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by clubhouse View Post

Not so surprisingly, RAID5 beats RAID10 indeed, as suggested by RobiNet previously. But now I am a bit confused... Should I really go with RAID5 and a strip size of 128k for a workstation that I will use for standard office work, running Vista x64? Any suggestions welcome...

...

Please note that I was not able to run write tests at 32k block size, as HDTune was crashing

Comments welcome!
Looking at your results, I think I would go with RAID5, 64k stripe. If I remember correctly, larger stripe sizes almost always bench higher, so that is probably why the 128k looks tempting. I think the smaller size would be better for OS use though.

If HDTune crashes with 32k stripes, I wouldn't use that size just in case it is crashing due to a firmware bug or conflict on the card.
the_beast is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-24-09   #2268 (permalink)
*cough* Stock *cough*
 
clubhouse's Avatar
 
intel ati

Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: London UK
Posts: 20

Rep: 2 clubhouse Unknown
Unique Rep: 2
Trader Rating: 0
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by the_beast View Post
Looking at your results, I think I would go with RAID5, 64k stripe. If I remember correctly, larger stripe sizes almost always bench higher, so that is probably why the 128k looks tempting. I think the smaller size would be better for OS use though.
Well, RAID5-64k looks almost as good as RAID5-128k in write results, if not better with 128k blocks. Also, it's not that far behind it in read results... So indeed I was wondering if I should go with RAID5-64k. It could be the best compromise, even though I was initially convinced RAID10 would be much better. Oh well, I'll gain another 300 Gb with RAID5, so I won't complain

Quote:
Originally Posted by the_beast View Post
If HDTune crashes with 32k stripes, I wouldn't use that size just in case it is crashing due to a firmware bug or conflict on the card.
Well, HDTune was crashing when I tried to run write tests with a benchmarck block size of 32k, and that was for all different RAID configurations. So I ran write tests only with block sizes from 64k to 512k
__________________
My benchmarks for different RAID5 and RAID10 configs on my system: read | write

System: i7 Love Fest
CPU
Core i7 920
Motherboard
Asus P6T WS Pro
Memory
Corsair Dominator 6Gb DDR3-1600
Graphics Card
Asus EAH4350 fanless
Hard Drive
Perc5i + 4x300 Gb SAS Seagate Cheetah 15k.6
Power Supply
Silverstone NightJar ST45NF fanless
Case
LianLi PC-V2110B
OS
Vista Ultimate x64
Monitor
Dell S2309W
clubhouse is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-24-09   #2269 (permalink)
New to Overclock.net
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 3

Rep: 0 mrwilby Unknown
Unique Rep: 0
Trader Rating: 0
Default

Hey all.

Great thread. I am about to pull the trigger on a couple of these, but wondered if somebody who owns one already could answer a few questions:

1) Does the card support any kind of configurable (or otherwise) spin up delay so that you can e.g. batch boot 4 drives at a time in order to reduce stress on the PSU?

2) If I want, can I skip all the RAID functionality and just use the card as an HBA for JBOD, perhaps under e.g. linux (sw raid5/6) or solaris (sw raidz)?

Thanks!
mrwilby is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-24-09   #2270 (permalink)
4.0 GHz
 
DJZeratul's Avatar
 
intel ati

Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: San Diego, CA
Posts: 1,811

Rep: 199 DJZeratul is acknowledged by manyDJZeratul is acknowledged by many
Unique Rep: 159
Trader Rating: 3
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by mrwilby View Post
Hey all.

Great thread. I am about to pull the trigger on a couple of these, but wondered if somebody who owns one already could answer a few questions:

1) Does the card support any kind of configurable (or otherwise) spin up delay so that you can e.g. batch boot 4 drives at a time in order to reduce stress on the PSU?

2) If I want, can I skip all the RAID functionality and just use the card as an HBA for JBOD, perhaps under e.g. linux (sw raid5/6) or solaris (sw raidz)?

Thanks!
I am not sure about staggered spin up.

But why on earth would you want to use software raid 5 when this card does hardware raid 5?
__________________

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mitch Hedburg
I don't have a microwave oven, but I do have a clock that occasionally cooks stuff.

System: Killah Bawx VI: i7 Edition
CPU
Core i7 920 @ 4.0 GHz
Motherboard
ASUS P6T Deluxe
Memory
3x2GB Corsair Dominator DDR3-1600
Graphics Card
2 4870X2 Quad CFX
Hard Drive
Intel: 5x750GB 7200.10, PERC 6/i: 8x1TB Cav. Black
Sound Card
SoundMAX 7.1->DAC & HD4870x2->HDMI->7.1 Receiver
Power Supply
Antec TruPower Quattro 1KW, Ultra 500W for 8x RAID
Case
Custom Fabricated 18" cube (Mountain Mods UFO)
CPU cooling
Cooler Master V8 w/ SilverStone Fan
GPU cooling
Stock Diamond Cooler
OS
Windows 7 x64 Ultimate
Monitor
Dell 2407FPW + Optoma HD70 720p Projector
DJZeratul is offline DJZeratul's Gallery   Reply With Quote
Reply

Tags
perc, raid, raid card


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 3 (0 members and 3 guests)
 
Thread Tools



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:46 PM.


Overclock.net is a Carbon Neutral Site Creative Commons License

Terms of Service / Forum Rules | Privacy Policy | DMCA Info | Advertising | Become an Official Vendor
Copyright © 2009 Shogun Interactive Development. Most rights reserved.
Page generated in 0.15441 seconds with 9 queries