|
![]() |
Overclock.net - Overclocking.net > Industry News > Software News | |
[DT] Microsoft Fights EU's $1.4B USD Fine
|
||
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools |
|
|
#41 (permalink) | |||||||||||||||
|
The Dapper Swindler
![]() |
Quote:
The EU is attacking Microsoft in every way it can find to try and increase the fines. They could care less about what MS is doing. In fact, other companies are trying to take advantage of this: Quote:
What I really can't understand is why they are soloing out Microsoft in this, isn't Opera available for OSX and Linux? While they are at it why don't they sue Apple and, say, Canonical for not including Opera in their operating systems? These double standards are 100 times worse than anything Microsoft is allegedly doing.
__________________
Member of the Secret Cult of the F5F5F5. To join, copy this text into your signature
|
|||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
#42 (permalink) | ||||||||||||||
|
1:14 Camera:People Ratio
![]() |
Quote:
As you've already been told in this thread, MS weren't fined 14% of their annual profit (1.4bn) right away, they were fined a much smaller amount first, and asked to comply with regulations, which they then decided not to. This is why the fine is higher now. If they'd just done as asked and paid the original fine, they wouldn't be in this situation now. MS draws more attention, because it is, for all intents and purposes, a monopoly. Monopolies are, inherently, anti-competitive. The laws MS is breaking are designed to regulate competition, so it can be maintained and stimulated. Try to remember, the capitalism we love so much, relies on healthy competition to survive. Without competition, we don't have true capitalist economies. MS is the antithesis of competition. It doesn't seek to compete, it seeks to destroy. MS is terrified of competition, which is why it tries (and succeeds) to snuff it out before it can get a foot hold. It does this in three main ways: 1. It tries to buy the potential competition. 2. It tries to tie the potential competition up in expensive litigation. 3. It tires destroy any custom for the potential competition, by exerting it's influence over the computer industry and creating circumstances where taking up the potential competition is undesirable. MS seeks to destroy competition, as it has effectively done in the main markets it operates within. The whole computer industry is warped around the MS gravity well. MS has enormous influence in virtually every sector of computing and that influence is ever expanding outwards towards other markets as well. This is why MS (and other monopolies and quasi-monopolies) are given more attention by the EU when they trade within it. Not because they are American, or because they are rich, but because they represent the biggest threat to healthy competition (as defined by EU law) within EU markets. It's really that simple. I state it once more: If you want to trade in the EU, you have to abide by EU law, regardless of if you think that law is fair or not. Likewise, if you want to trade in the US, you have to abide by US law, regardless of if you think that law is fair or not. Different regions of the world have different laws. If you don't want to abide by them, either don't operate where those laws are in force, or expect to be fined. Highly-Annoyed
__________________
. Wise men speak because they have something to say; Fools because they have to say something. -Plato Talk sense to a fool and he calls you foolish. -Euripides .. Terrifying are the weaknesses of power. -Greek Proverb ----—-—-———————————————————————————————————————————————— My Favourite Windows XP Freeware Page . ...' ..'. Wowza's Core 2 Duo Motherboard Analysis----—-—-———————————————————————————————————————————————— OCN Camera Club Nikon D300 | Tokina 11-16mm f2.8 | Tamron 17-50mm f2.8 | Tamron 90mm f2.8 Macro | 2X SB600 Speedlights
|
||||||||||||||
|
|
![]() |
| Tags |
| law, monopoly |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|