CyberWolf575

Im using Chrome 4 and FF 3.5.2 And i always have both open. To tell you the truth, i like both of the browsers. I DO however sometimes notice that chrome opens pages faster then FF but most of the time its unnoticeable.

Now for chrome it self, well i just love the interface, how its simple yet so functional. I love that i can type in one latter and my most visited sites come up, or that i never have to switch address bars to search for something.

I personally have usually around 15-20 tabs open at a time on each browser.....i know that its kinda pointless, but i tend to leave a lot of interesting articles up or forums and pages that i might want to come back later to, so when i open up a browser with 20 tabs and Chrome beats FF in loading time, at least that makes me happy

__________________
Reality is boring, fantasy is out of reach, dreams are what we have at night, so what do we do during the day?

wierdo124

Test is rigged...someone do Google V8 in Firefox right now. I just scored 550, not there 230 or whatever

__________________
Dig cars more than computers? Stop by CarForum.net!
E8400 C0 @ 4.3GHz on AIR
Quote by Syrillian: "Nono!...Kill person."
Windows 7||Fan Club The ß₤ứə Çřёώ The American Overclockers The Tux Club The Red Tide
Never Use Your Flash Drive the Same Again! Supercharge Vista!
[F@H]View Your Fahmon From Anywhere!
Member of Royal Navy GPU F@H Team

bmost1022

FF does the EXACT same thing.

Oh and why don't they add a point for each extension the browsers have.. then FF wins by 1000s. FF ftw

__________________

The "Official" Antec 1200 Club
-Mozilla Firefox Club-
We Are Gr33n Machine
AN ADVOCATE OF THE RAZER CU|T
Member of the OCN Diablo III Club

crashovride02

What I thought was interesting is how close the loading times were for most of the browsers here and ff was 2nd and 3rd in those. But, if you look at the individual tests FF didn't do so well or was in the middle somewhere.

__________________
CPU-z Validation!

nathris

Those results are dependent on processor speed, they are really only useful compared to other browsers on the same system.

And V8 is incredibly biased. I'm almost positive that somewhere in the test routine it checks if the browser is using WebKit, and then adds 1000 points, and then adds a few hundred more if its a google browser.

Sunspider and V8 test basically the same thing, but WebKit's Sunspider puts Chrome 2 at 12% faster than FF 3.5, while Google's V8 puts it at 670% faster.

__________________

Raiden911

I am surprised by the results.

FireFox FTW!

__________________

**The Megahalems Club**

Beric

My Dad keeps saying IE8 is actually GOOD. Now I can show him this.

Running Firefox 3.5 on my PC, Safari 4.1 on my Mac. Surprised Safari for PC performed so well.

Ecchi-BANZAII!!!

On sig speed.

Richards: 1347
DeltaBlue: 81.1
Crypto: 681
RayTrace: 258
EarleyBoyer: 328
RegExp: 252


Show him this


One second more or less isn't the issue here, it's the percentage between them.

__________________
　　　＿_ 　
　/'´　 　ヽ 　　　　Oh and as for the Man-Erin i was tempted to post that also lol. For some reason i want to call it "Marin"
●ｌｶﾉﾉﾙ ﾋﾟﾉ●　　　　　Marc Rudov FTW　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　ತ_ತ
　从 ﾟ ヮﾟﾉｿ 　　 　　　　 Don't you love when someone
⊂ ［］ 二［］つ　　 　　 　　deletes your post without noticing you.　　　 　
　 /　 V \ 　　　　 　　　 You end up searching for that post in vain and anger...
　/____ \　 　 　　　　　　　I hate Autotunes
　 （/ （/　 　　　　　　　　　　　Smiley of the year:

Desidero

Before I go into the rest of my post and your eyes glaze over, I'll start out by saying that I use Firefox and I'll continue to use it unless something huge changes with Chrome/Opera. I could care less if they're a fraction of a second faster at some things. The Firefox addons trump any performance benefits any other browser can bring to the table. Yes, I have tried them all multiple times as updates come out. I'm also not comfortable using a browser made by an advertising company.

With that out of the way, here's the important part of my post: You can actually view the source for the V8 test page and see exactly what's in those javascript files. The ones I checked are all pretty easy to figure out, so feel free to take a look through them. I did not notice anything in the source for the main page or the scripts that would give Chrome any benefit at all. The engine behind Chrome just does really well at whatever type of processing those scripts use.

no1Joeno1

Firefox is faster. I'm using 3.7. I have both that and Google Chrome, well what ever a benchmark made by Google says, Firefox loads the pages better and faster.