Overclock.net - Overclocking.net
     
 
Home Gallery Reviews Blogs Register Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Members List


Go Back   Overclock.net - Overclocking.net > Industry News > Software News

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 10-16-09   #1 (permalink)
4.0 GHz
 
dharmaBum's Avatar
 
intel nvidia

Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Raleigh, NC
Posts: 780

Rep: 124 dharmaBum is acknowledged by manydharmaBum is acknowledged by many
Unique Rep: 90
Trader Rating: 0
Default [cnet] Caught between a Red Hat and a CentOS

Source

Quote:
Novell has been positioning itself as the Avis of Linux, a distant but gaining Red Hat competitor that "tries harder." Like Oracle, Novell argues that it can give customers Red Hat value at a lower price.

There's just one problem with this marketing spin: the "low-cost alternative" to Red Hat isn't Novell. It's CentOS. And CentOS is free as in $0.00.
Quote:
It's true that adoption of unpaid Linux like CentOS is booming, and that this no-cost alternative to more expensive solutions like Red Hat is a real threat to Red Hat. This is no doubt why Red Hat has made "free-to-paid" a core element of its ongoing strategy, as related in its recent earnings call.

But it's a much bigger threat to Novell and Oracle, both of whom are trying to position themselves as cheaper alternatives to Red Hat Enterprise Linux.

If a customer really wants Red Hat at a lower price, they're not going to move to an incompatible distribution that may or may not run their applications properly. They're going to jump to CentOS, which is basically a carbon copy of RHEL, minus the trademarks (and price tag).
Quote:
CentOS: Red Hat's biggest annoyance and greatest friend?

It's not dissimilar to the role that piracy plays for protecting Microsoft's Windows dominance against Linux, especially in emerging markets. Quite possibly the worst thing that Microsoft could do, as IDC has also suggested, is to succeed in its anti-piracy efforts.

Were Microsoft to raise its pricing above $0.00 in such markets, suddenly Linux would look like a much better alternative.
__________________
3DMark06: 19091 - 3DMark Vantage: P15264 - SuperPi: 10.968s

Programming Quote of the Day:
Stan Kelly-Bootle:
Quote:
Should array indices start at 0 or 1? My compromise of 0.5 was rejected without, I thought, proper consideration.

System: Europa
CPU
E8500 4.28ghz @ 1.36v
Motherboard
EVGA 780i SLi P05 Bios
Memory
G.SKILL 4GB(2x2GB) @ 924MHz (5-4-4-12-2T)
Graphics Card
2xEVGA 8800GTS (G92) 512MB @800/2000/2110
Hard Drive
Seagate 500gbx2, (fake-)RAID0
Sound Card
Sound Blaster X-Fi XtremeGamer
Power Supply
CORSAIR 1000HX 1000W
Case
Gigabyte GZ-FA2CA-AJB Black Aluminum
CPU cooling
TDX 775 Block, 360 BlackIce rad
GPU cooling
MAZE5x2, TT copper HS
OS
Fedora10-86_64/Vista64
Monitor
22" Samsung SyncMaster 2232BW
dharmaBum is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:21 AM.


Overclock.net is a Carbon Neutral Site Creative Commons License

Terms of Service / Forum Rules | Privacy Policy | DMCA Info | Advertising | Become an Official Vendor
Copyright © 2009 Shogun Interactive Development. Most rights reserved.
Page generated in 0.11093 seconds with 8 queries