Overclock.net › Forums › Components › Hard Drives & Storage › SSD › intel 320 less reliable than G2 due to 25nm?
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

intel 320 less reliable than G2 due to 25nm?

post #1 of 2
Thread Starter 
what do you think of this?
http://blogs.computerworld.com/18048...urce=rss_blogs fix'd
Quote:
And smaller NAND cells retain significantly less charge. Less charge in a cell means they're more prone to charge leakage -- which is especially worrisome when the cells are MLC (multi-level cell)...

... That's why Intel wants to use its new technology on the cheaper, mass-market drives first. Although the company will have performed extensive testing, and has no doubt included plenty of error-correction encoding smarts, it remains to be seen how reliable this this new manufacturing process is.
22
Edited by webtax - 4/28/11 at 8:48am
Tortuga
(15 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
QuadCore Intel Core i5-2500K@4500 MHz Asus P8P67 Pro Gigabyte ATI Radeon HD 4850 (RV770) 4x4 GB DDR3-1333 DDR3 SDRAM 
Hard DriveOptical DriveCoolingOS
Crucial M4 128Gb, Deskstar 7K1000.C, Seagate 250GB n/a External Asus BDWR Windows 8 Pro x64 
MonitorKeyboardPowerCase
Lg W2353V Genius Slimstar i220 Sentey 1000w Axio 732 
MouseMouse PadAudio
Logitech Mx-510 Func F-10 Audigy 2zs 
  hide details  
Reply
Tortuga
(15 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
QuadCore Intel Core i5-2500K@4500 MHz Asus P8P67 Pro Gigabyte ATI Radeon HD 4850 (RV770) 4x4 GB DDR3-1333 DDR3 SDRAM 
Hard DriveOptical DriveCoolingOS
Crucial M4 128Gb, Deskstar 7K1000.C, Seagate 250GB n/a External Asus BDWR Windows 8 Pro x64 
MonitorKeyboardPowerCase
Lg W2353V Genius Slimstar i220 Sentey 1000w Axio 732 
MouseMouse PadAudio
Logitech Mx-510 Func F-10 Audigy 2zs 
  hide details  
Reply
post #2 of 2
Link is no good.

Less reliable and less P/E cycles are two different things.

However, all companies expect ECC to make up the difference.
Once again...
(13 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
i7 920 [4.28GHz, HT] Asus P6T + Broadcom NetXtreme II VisionTek HD5850 [900/1200] + Galaxy GT240 2x4GB G.Skill Ripjaw X [1632 MHz] 
Hard DriveOSMonitorKeyboard
Intel X25-M 160GB + 3xRAID0 500GB 7200.12 Window 7 Pro 64 Acer H243H + Samsung 226BW XARMOR-U9BL  
PowerCaseMouseMouse Pad
Antec Truepower New 750W Li Lian PC-V2100 [10x120mm fans] Logitech G9 X-Trac Pro 
  hide details  
Reply
Once again...
(13 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
i7 920 [4.28GHz, HT] Asus P6T + Broadcom NetXtreme II VisionTek HD5850 [900/1200] + Galaxy GT240 2x4GB G.Skill Ripjaw X [1632 MHz] 
Hard DriveOSMonitorKeyboard
Intel X25-M 160GB + 3xRAID0 500GB 7200.12 Window 7 Pro 64 Acer H243H + Samsung 226BW XARMOR-U9BL  
PowerCaseMouseMouse Pad
Antec Truepower New 750W Li Lian PC-V2100 [10x120mm fans] Logitech G9 X-Trac Pro 
  hide details  
Reply
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: SSD
Overclock.net › Forums › Components › Hard Drives & Storage › SSD › intel 320 less reliable than G2 due to 25nm?