Overclock.net › Forums › Intel › Intel CPUs › Superpi 58x98 vs 57x100? (2600k)
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

Superpi 58x98 vs 57x100? (2600k)

post #1 of 5
Thread Starter 

Thats as for how far I can take it with ~1.7 volts. The thing is. I scored 6.590 with 57x100. And with a decrease in BCLK the Times' even got worse!!

Using 1 stick of ram shaves off about 0.050 off the time as vs using 2. Why is single mode faster than dual?
Gene Z
(8 items)
 
5970CF H2O
(16 items)
 
Core X
(9 items)
 
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
Intel 2500K ASUS Max Gene Z ASUS 580GTX CU II G.Skill Ripjawz  
Hard DriveCoolingPowerCase
WD Black 1TB/64MB Air Corsair 850 Temjin TJ08-E 
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
Intel Core i7 2600K Asrock Z68 Fata1ty Pro Gen 3 2 x ATI Radeon 5970 Corsair Vengeance 16GB 
Hard DriveHard DriveOptical DriveCooling
OCZ Vertex 2 SSD 120GB Seagate 7200.12 80GB LG BD Burner GPUs watercooled / CPU stock 
OSMonitorKeyboardPower
Windows 7 24" Samsung LCD Some old junk FD 1000W 
CaseMouseMouse PadAudio
800D Microsoft something Its round, with a picture of a cookie Onboard (Realtek something) 
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
Intel Core i7 3960X Asus Rampage IV Extreme GTX580s (4) Corsair Vengeance 1600Mhz 
CoolingOSMonitorPower
1080 + 3x360 Windows 7 Samsung 8005 55" Corsair AX1200 
Case
Xigmatek  
  hide details  
Reply
Gene Z
(8 items)
 
5970CF H2O
(16 items)
 
Core X
(9 items)
 
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
Intel 2500K ASUS Max Gene Z ASUS 580GTX CU II G.Skill Ripjawz  
Hard DriveCoolingPowerCase
WD Black 1TB/64MB Air Corsair 850 Temjin TJ08-E 
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
Intel Core i7 2600K Asrock Z68 Fata1ty Pro Gen 3 2 x ATI Radeon 5970 Corsair Vengeance 16GB 
Hard DriveHard DriveOptical DriveCooling
OCZ Vertex 2 SSD 120GB Seagate 7200.12 80GB LG BD Burner GPUs watercooled / CPU stock 
OSMonitorKeyboardPower
Windows 7 24" Samsung LCD Some old junk FD 1000W 
CaseMouseMouse PadAudio
800D Microsoft something Its round, with a picture of a cookie Onboard (Realtek something) 
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
Intel Core i7 3960X Asus Rampage IV Extreme GTX580s (4) Corsair Vengeance 1600Mhz 
CoolingOSMonitorPower
1080 + 3x360 Windows 7 Samsung 8005 55" Corsair AX1200 
Case
Xigmatek  
  hide details  
Reply
post #2 of 5
Less RAM means less stress on the memory controller, which is on the die, so that could be that? Also, I have that keyboard!

What temps are you at? Did you get this running under DICE?

I take it 59x100 won't work?
    
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
Intel i5 2500 @ 4,004GHz (1.202v) Asus P8P67-PRO B3 Leadtek GTX260 65nm 896MB 700|1430|1100 4GB DDR3 Muskin 1686MHz 
Hard DriveOptical DriveOSMonitor
2xWD CB 250GB, 2x SG 320GB, 1xSS F1 1TB Pioneer DVD-RW Windows 7 Professional 64bit Samsung 2032BW 20" 1680x1050 16:10 
KeyboardPowerCaseMouse
Razer Lycosa CoolerMaster GX 550W Coolermaster Storm Sniper Razer DeathAdder 
Mouse Pad
Razer Goliathus 
  hide details  
Reply
    
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
Intel i5 2500 @ 4,004GHz (1.202v) Asus P8P67-PRO B3 Leadtek GTX260 65nm 896MB 700|1430|1100 4GB DDR3 Muskin 1686MHz 
Hard DriveOptical DriveOSMonitor
2xWD CB 250GB, 2x SG 320GB, 1xSS F1 1TB Pioneer DVD-RW Windows 7 Professional 64bit Samsung 2032BW 20" 1680x1050 16:10 
KeyboardPowerCaseMouse
Razer Lycosa CoolerMaster GX 550W Coolermaster Storm Sniper Razer DeathAdder 
Mouse Pad
Razer Goliathus 
  hide details  
Reply
post #3 of 5
Thread Starter 
59x100 boots but crashes at "welcome to Windows". No still water.
I need a huge bump in vcore to make that 59 run. Blah
Gene Z
(8 items)
 
5970CF H2O
(16 items)
 
Core X
(9 items)
 
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
Intel 2500K ASUS Max Gene Z ASUS 580GTX CU II G.Skill Ripjawz  
Hard DriveCoolingPowerCase
WD Black 1TB/64MB Air Corsair 850 Temjin TJ08-E 
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
Intel Core i7 2600K Asrock Z68 Fata1ty Pro Gen 3 2 x ATI Radeon 5970 Corsair Vengeance 16GB 
Hard DriveHard DriveOptical DriveCooling
OCZ Vertex 2 SSD 120GB Seagate 7200.12 80GB LG BD Burner GPUs watercooled / CPU stock 
OSMonitorKeyboardPower
Windows 7 24" Samsung LCD Some old junk FD 1000W 
CaseMouseMouse PadAudio
800D Microsoft something Its round, with a picture of a cookie Onboard (Realtek something) 
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
Intel Core i7 3960X Asus Rampage IV Extreme GTX580s (4) Corsair Vengeance 1600Mhz 
CoolingOSMonitorPower
1080 + 3x360 Windows 7 Samsung 8005 55" Corsair AX1200 
Case
Xigmatek  
  hide details  
Reply
Gene Z
(8 items)
 
5970CF H2O
(16 items)
 
Core X
(9 items)
 
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
Intel 2500K ASUS Max Gene Z ASUS 580GTX CU II G.Skill Ripjawz  
Hard DriveCoolingPowerCase
WD Black 1TB/64MB Air Corsair 850 Temjin TJ08-E 
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
Intel Core i7 2600K Asrock Z68 Fata1ty Pro Gen 3 2 x ATI Radeon 5970 Corsair Vengeance 16GB 
Hard DriveHard DriveOptical DriveCooling
OCZ Vertex 2 SSD 120GB Seagate 7200.12 80GB LG BD Burner GPUs watercooled / CPU stock 
OSMonitorKeyboardPower
Windows 7 24" Samsung LCD Some old junk FD 1000W 
CaseMouseMouse PadAudio
800D Microsoft something Its round, with a picture of a cookie Onboard (Realtek something) 
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
Intel Core i7 3960X Asus Rampage IV Extreme GTX580s (4) Corsair Vengeance 1600Mhz 
CoolingOSMonitorPower
1080 + 3x360 Windows 7 Samsung 8005 55" Corsair AX1200 
Case
Xigmatek  
  hide details  
Reply
post #4 of 5
When use many core they use same RAM and the RAM speed slow double per aplication, but if you use multithreaded aplication the result will be better
try multicore superpi http://www.benchlab.org/download
post #5 of 5
ouu! sorry you ask for single vs dual chanel memory
the result is approximately same because the all task is in cache
try with more than 8M
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: Intel CPUs
Overclock.net › Forums › Intel › Intel CPUs › Superpi 58x98 vs 57x100? (2600k)