Overclock.net › Forums › Components › Memory › 1333 Cl8 vs 1600 CL9, AMD?
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

1333 Cl8 vs 1600 CL9, AMD? - Page 2

post #11 of 15
I do 1333mhz 7-7-7-21-1t on some really cheap ocz ram.
Skoll
(14 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
5820k@4.4 Gigabyte X99 SOC Champion Sapphire 290X TriX 8GB Crossfire G.Skill Ripjaws V @3200 
Hard DriveCoolingOSMonitor
Samsung 850 Evo Noctua NH-D15 Windows 7  Asus MG279Q 
KeyboardPowerCaseMouse
Custom Poker SeaSonic SS-850 Thermaltake Core X9 Logitech G5 v1 
Mouse PadAudio
Razer Destructor 2 Vali 2 + Modi 2 Uber + ATH-AD1000X 
  hide details  
Reply
Skoll
(14 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
5820k@4.4 Gigabyte X99 SOC Champion Sapphire 290X TriX 8GB Crossfire G.Skill Ripjaws V @3200 
Hard DriveCoolingOSMonitor
Samsung 850 Evo Noctua NH-D15 Windows 7  Asus MG279Q 
KeyboardPowerCaseMouse
Custom Poker SeaSonic SS-850 Thermaltake Core X9 Logitech G5 v1 
Mouse PadAudio
Razer Destructor 2 Vali 2 + Modi 2 Uber + ATH-AD1000X 
  hide details  
Reply
post #12 of 15
1600 CL9 is cheaper, faster, better
1333 CL8 is quite pointless IMO, they try to sell it at same price point as 1600 CL9 or higher even though it doesn't offer same performance. The quality is most of the time on par with a generic 1333 CL9 kit. Quite a waste of you were ever to buy a kit with such rating.
post #13 of 15
Thread Starter 
Just ran maxxmem2 and the bench results are interesting, i ran my DDR3 @ 1333 CL8 AND @ 1666 CL9 and the CL9 actually was faster than the CL8 memory both in terms of read/write, but also latency (2.9 ns faster in latency)
Oppress This!
(13 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
Phenom 2 X4 B55BE @ 3.7 ASUS M4A89GTD-PRO USB3 GTX 470 + GTX 275 SOC 4gb Crucial Ballistix T 1600 6-8-6-20-24 1T 
Hard DriveOptical DriveOSMonitor
2xWD640AAHLS + Hitachi 2TB 7200RPM + 2x150gb VRapt HP IDE + LG SATA Win 7 x64 ult 15" 1024x768 Dell (visually impaired) 
PowerCase
XFX XXX 650w (green fan) Antec 300 (Heavily Modded) 
  hide details  
Reply
Oppress This!
(13 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
Phenom 2 X4 B55BE @ 3.7 ASUS M4A89GTD-PRO USB3 GTX 470 + GTX 275 SOC 4gb Crucial Ballistix T 1600 6-8-6-20-24 1T 
Hard DriveOptical DriveOSMonitor
2xWD640AAHLS + Hitachi 2TB 7200RPM + 2x150gb VRapt HP IDE + LG SATA Win 7 x64 ult 15" 1024x768 Dell (visually impaired) 
PowerCase
XFX XXX 650w (green fan) Antec 300 (Heavily Modded) 
  hide details  
Reply
post #14 of 15
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by xd_1771;13409529 
1600 CL9 is cheaper, faster, better
1333 CL8 is quite pointless IMO, they try to sell it at same price point as 1600 CL9 or higher even though it doesn't offer same performance. The quality is most of the time on par with a generic 1333 CL9 kit. Quite a waste of you were ever to buy a kit with such rating.

I could have gotten 1600 CL9 but i went with 1333 because it was blue and matched my color scheme tongue.gif
Oppress This!
(13 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
Phenom 2 X4 B55BE @ 3.7 ASUS M4A89GTD-PRO USB3 GTX 470 + GTX 275 SOC 4gb Crucial Ballistix T 1600 6-8-6-20-24 1T 
Hard DriveOptical DriveOSMonitor
2xWD640AAHLS + Hitachi 2TB 7200RPM + 2x150gb VRapt HP IDE + LG SATA Win 7 x64 ult 15" 1024x768 Dell (visually impaired) 
PowerCase
XFX XXX 650w (green fan) Antec 300 (Heavily Modded) 
  hide details  
Reply
Oppress This!
(13 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
Phenom 2 X4 B55BE @ 3.7 ASUS M4A89GTD-PRO USB3 GTX 470 + GTX 275 SOC 4gb Crucial Ballistix T 1600 6-8-6-20-24 1T 
Hard DriveOptical DriveOSMonitor
2xWD640AAHLS + Hitachi 2TB 7200RPM + 2x150gb VRapt HP IDE + LG SATA Win 7 x64 ult 15" 1024x768 Dell (visually impaired) 
PowerCase
XFX XXX 650w (green fan) Antec 300 (Heavily Modded) 
  hide details  
Reply
post #15 of 15
Colour schemes, colour schemes.. meh. You should see my PC, the inside is a multitude of different colours in an ugly mashup of win smile.gif
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: Memory
Overclock.net › Forums › Components › Memory › 1333 Cl8 vs 1600 CL9, AMD?