Overclock.net › Forums › Industry News › Rumors and Unconfirmed Articles › [Softpedia]More AMD Bulldozer Benchmarks Surface
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

[Softpedia]More AMD Bulldozer Benchmarks Surface - Page 5  

post #41 of 76
Quote:
Originally Posted by Viridian;13463233 
This is extremely likely to be a low power X6 Phenom II chip. Maybe a prototype for laptops or smaller form factor (vs atom?) I'm going with laptops at the moment.

That or perhaps immature hardware not being taken advantage of.

EDIT:

Also, my post = better than those calling fake. Looks pretty damn legit me.

That is a reasonable theory but it still doesn't explain the differences in core voltage with no change in frequency.
post #42 of 76
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kirby1 View Post
Just dosent seem like an AMD cpu could beat an i7 since i7s have more thread.
The clock speeds are at stock. You are right clock for clock, but the i7 is clocked lower I believe. I am sure if you look around you will see similar Phenom II benchmarks. HT doesn't add much even in benchmarks.

Bulldozer will not be slower than Phenom II people.
post #43 of 76
Quote:
Originally Posted by ThePath View Post
Task manager in screenshot shows 6 threads. It might be that CPU-z is not able to recognise bulldozer correctly

Also, there are two scores of cinebench. One is single thread score and other for multi-thread. If bulldozer was using 1 core, then the score should be identical in both tests.
Im sure. Well, there it is. Bulldozer will equal about the same power as an Athlon II X4, and will run between 0.948v and 1.450v at just stock 3.0ghz. Everyone that has been on the fence go Sandy Bridge now!!!
Edited by Chuckclc - 5/11/11 at 2:44am
post #44 of 76
Quote:
Originally Posted by JCPUser View Post
We care about bulldozer not Phenom II. You do realize that the name "Phenom" has been replaced by "FX" for bulldozer, right?
Sorry, why are you being antagonistic with me particularly?

I didn't call your pictures fake or spout some nonsense about AMD being crap. So, why?
    
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
Intel i5 2500 @ 4,004GHz (1.202v) Asus P8P67-PRO B3 Leadtek GTX260 65nm 896MB 700|1430|1100 4GB DDR3 Muskin 1686MHz 
Hard DriveOptical DriveOSMonitor
2xWD CB 250GB, 2x SG 320GB, 1xSS F1 1TB Pioneer DVD-RW Windows 7 Professional 64bit Samsung 2032BW 20" 1680x1050 16:10 
KeyboardPowerCaseMouse
Razer Lycosa CoolerMaster GX 550W Coolermaster Storm Sniper Razer DeathAdder 
Mouse Pad
Razer Goliathus 
  hide details  
    
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
Intel i5 2500 @ 4,004GHz (1.202v) Asus P8P67-PRO B3 Leadtek GTX260 65nm 896MB 700|1430|1100 4GB DDR3 Muskin 1686MHz 
Hard DriveOptical DriveOSMonitor
2xWD CB 250GB, 2x SG 320GB, 1xSS F1 1TB Pioneer DVD-RW Windows 7 Professional 64bit Samsung 2032BW 20" 1680x1050 16:10 
KeyboardPowerCaseMouse
Razer Lycosa CoolerMaster GX 550W Coolermaster Storm Sniper Razer DeathAdder 
Mouse Pad
Razer Goliathus 
  hide details  
post #45 of 76
3.14PTS in cinebench at 3GHz 8 cores? That's low!
X79-GCN
(22 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
Intel 3930K 4.5GHz HT GIGABYTE GA-X79-UP4 AMD R9-290X GEil Evo Potenza DDR3 2400MHz CL10 (4x4GB) 
Hard DriveCoolingCoolingCooling
Samsung 840 Pro 120GB EK Supremacy (CPU) NF F12's P/P (360 Rad)  NF A14's (420 Rad)  
CoolingCoolingCoolingCooling
XSPC Chrome Compression Fittings EK RES X3 150 Primochill PremoFlex Advanced LRT Clear 1/2 ID EK-FC (R9 290X) 
CoolingCoolingCoolingOS
EK D5 Vario Top-X  Phobya G-Changer V2 360mm Phobya G-Changer V2 420mm Win 10 x64 Pro 
MonitorKeyboardPowerCase
BenQ XR3501 35" Curved Corsair Vengeance K90 Seasonic X-1250 Gold (v2) Corsair 900D 
MouseAudio
Logitech G400s Senn HD 598 
  hide details  
X79-GCN
(22 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
Intel 3930K 4.5GHz HT GIGABYTE GA-X79-UP4 AMD R9-290X GEil Evo Potenza DDR3 2400MHz CL10 (4x4GB) 
Hard DriveCoolingCoolingCooling
Samsung 840 Pro 120GB EK Supremacy (CPU) NF F12's P/P (360 Rad)  NF A14's (420 Rad)  
CoolingCoolingCoolingCooling
XSPC Chrome Compression Fittings EK RES X3 150 Primochill PremoFlex Advanced LRT Clear 1/2 ID EK-FC (R9 290X) 
CoolingCoolingCoolingOS
EK D5 Vario Top-X  Phobya G-Changer V2 360mm Phobya G-Changer V2 420mm Win 10 x64 Pro 
MonitorKeyboardPowerCase
BenQ XR3501 35" Curved Corsair Vengeance K90 Seasonic X-1250 Gold (v2) Corsair 900D 
MouseAudio
Logitech G400s Senn HD 598 
  hide details  
post #46 of 76
Quote:
Originally Posted by Viridian View Post
Sorry, why are you being antagonistic with me particularly?

I didn't call your pictures fake or spout some nonsense about AMD being crap. So, why?
I have no problem with you -- I just don't understand what you meant. It sounded like you were saying that the bench was of a low power bulldozer core that AMD was still going to call Phenom. That of course doesn't make sense so i called you out on it.

If I misunderstood your point, I apologize. What were you trying to say?
post #47 of 76
Quote:
Originally Posted by BradleyW View Post
3.14PTS in cinebench at 3GHz 8 cores? That's low!
Hence it being fake, I score 7.95 on my OC'd 1055T, these are the most BS leaks I've ever seen lol.
 
Media Center
(14 items)
 
 
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
Phenom II X4 955 @ 4ghz ASRock 970 Extreme 3 EVGA GTX 570 G.Skill Ripjaw X 1600mhz 7-7-7 
Hard DriveHard DriveOSMonitor
OCZ Agility 2 120GB SSD WD Blue 500GB HDD Win7-64bit Samsung 70" TV 
PowerCase
RaidMax 730W CM 912 
  hide details  
 
Media Center
(14 items)
 
 
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
Phenom II X4 955 @ 4ghz ASRock 970 Extreme 3 EVGA GTX 570 G.Skill Ripjaw X 1600mhz 7-7-7 
Hard DriveHard DriveOSMonitor
OCZ Agility 2 120GB SSD WD Blue 500GB HDD Win7-64bit Samsung 70" TV 
PowerCase
RaidMax 730W CM 912 
  hide details  
post #48 of 76
Quote:
Originally Posted by JCPUser View Post
I have no problem with you -- I just don't understand what you meant. It sounded like you were saying that the bench was of a low power bulldozer core that AMD was still going to call Phenom. That of course doesn't make sense so i called you out on it.

If I misunderstood your point, I apologize. What were you trying to say?
I thought this could be a low powered Bulldozer x6 on par with current Phenom II x6's, but looking at that vcore of 1.4 for 3GHz, I think this is an immature motherboard left on auto using benchmarks unaware of this architecture.

Look at these leaked SB results :
http://hwbot.org/article/newsflash/6...results_leaked


Nothing like today's results. I'm happy to wait and see!
    
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
Intel i5 2500 @ 4,004GHz (1.202v) Asus P8P67-PRO B3 Leadtek GTX260 65nm 896MB 700|1430|1100 4GB DDR3 Muskin 1686MHz 
Hard DriveOptical DriveOSMonitor
2xWD CB 250GB, 2x SG 320GB, 1xSS F1 1TB Pioneer DVD-RW Windows 7 Professional 64bit Samsung 2032BW 20" 1680x1050 16:10 
KeyboardPowerCaseMouse
Razer Lycosa CoolerMaster GX 550W Coolermaster Storm Sniper Razer DeathAdder 
Mouse Pad
Razer Goliathus 
  hide details  
    
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
Intel i5 2500 @ 4,004GHz (1.202v) Asus P8P67-PRO B3 Leadtek GTX260 65nm 896MB 700|1430|1100 4GB DDR3 Muskin 1686MHz 
Hard DriveOptical DriveOSMonitor
2xWD CB 250GB, 2x SG 320GB, 1xSS F1 1TB Pioneer DVD-RW Windows 7 Professional 64bit Samsung 2032BW 20" 1680x1050 16:10 
KeyboardPowerCaseMouse
Razer Lycosa CoolerMaster GX 550W Coolermaster Storm Sniper Razer DeathAdder 
Mouse Pad
Razer Goliathus 
  hide details  
post #49 of 76
I will be building a new rig primarily for Battlefield 3 and I have been patiently waiting for Bulldozer benchmarks to surface for a good few months now since I would rather go for AMD if the performance is slightly behind or above SB(doh).

It is a bit worrying that AMD is not releasing Benchmarks a month from release, reminds me of games that choose to not offer betas with the preface of improving the final product (eg Homefront, Brink) but in the end the product is really mediocre, hopefully this wont be the case with Bulldozer.
post #50 of 76
maybe it's a 3Ghz llano? Still technically a "bulldozer" just not the Zambezi "Bulldozer" we are expecting on the desktop...
Crimson Basilisk
(25 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsGraphics
Intel i7 2600K @ 5.1Ghz AsRock Extreme4 Gen3 Palit GTX 680 Jetstream 2GB Palit GTX 680 Jetstream 2GB 
RAMRAMHard DriveHard Drive
G.Skill F3-12800CL9D-8GBXL G.Skill F3-12800CL9D-8GBXL Sandisk Extreme 120GB SSD Sandisk Extreme 120GB SSD 
Hard DriveOptical DriveCoolingCooling
WD Caviar "Black" 1TB SATAII LG WH14NS40 Blu-ray Burner XSPC Rasa CPU (Acetal) Black RX360 Triple Fan Radiator 
CoolingCoolingOSMonitor
XSPC DDC Two BayRes BMaverick Laing DDC (MCP350) Windows 7 Ultimate x64 Philips 201B 21" CRT 
MonitorKeyboardPowerCase
ViewSonic VX922 19" LCD Diamond Digital Black Antec True Power 750w Antec LanBoy Air Red 
MouseMouse PadAudioOther
Epic Gear Meduza (By GEIL) Steel Series QCK+ XL Asus Xonar DX ROCCAT Kave 5.1 Surround Sound Gaming Headset 
Other
Sennheiser hd555 
  hide details  
Crimson Basilisk
(25 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsGraphics
Intel i7 2600K @ 5.1Ghz AsRock Extreme4 Gen3 Palit GTX 680 Jetstream 2GB Palit GTX 680 Jetstream 2GB 
RAMRAMHard DriveHard Drive
G.Skill F3-12800CL9D-8GBXL G.Skill F3-12800CL9D-8GBXL Sandisk Extreme 120GB SSD Sandisk Extreme 120GB SSD 
Hard DriveOptical DriveCoolingCooling
WD Caviar "Black" 1TB SATAII LG WH14NS40 Blu-ray Burner XSPC Rasa CPU (Acetal) Black RX360 Triple Fan Radiator 
CoolingCoolingOSMonitor
XSPC DDC Two BayRes BMaverick Laing DDC (MCP350) Windows 7 Ultimate x64 Philips 201B 21" CRT 
MonitorKeyboardPowerCase
ViewSonic VX922 19" LCD Diamond Digital Black Antec True Power 750w Antec LanBoy Air Red 
MouseMouse PadAudioOther
Epic Gear Meduza (By GEIL) Steel Series QCK+ XL Asus Xonar DX ROCCAT Kave 5.1 Surround Sound Gaming Headset 
Other
Sennheiser hd555 
  hide details  
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: Rumors and Unconfirmed Articles
This thread is locked  
Overclock.net › Forums › Industry News › Rumors and Unconfirmed Articles › [Softpedia]More AMD Bulldozer Benchmarks Surface