Overclock.net › Forums › AMD › AMD - General › overclockersunited Q/A: How do you think AMD Bulldozer processors will do?
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

overclockersunited Q/A: How do you think AMD Bulldozer processors will do? - Page 2

Poll Results: How will Bulldozer do?

 
  • 42% (11)
    I think it will match up with Intel Sandy Bridge, but the price will be lower.
  • 26% (7)
    I think it will not keep up with Intel Sandy Bridge, but have a lower price.
  • 30% (8)
    I think it will beat Intel Sandy Bridge and have a matching or lower price.
26 Total Votes  
post #11 of 16
I think personally BD will reopen the window for AMD to become competitive in more than just price which is a nice change for them. Also it will force intel to drop there greedy prices on just about every chip in the lineup.

To the poster mentioning the 2600k, i would be happy to run an amd chip that was as snappy as that and get the extra cores.

Also, I know that AMD does the standard and BE chips but I think that they should come out with an extreme brand of there own, something thats just not even remotley close to necessary for most gamers/enthus.
    
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
FX8350 Gigabyte 990FX UD3 7950 4x4 Corsiar Dominator 1600 
Hard DriveOptical DriveOSMonitor
x2 Corsair f120's in raid 0 ASUS BUDGET CD, DVD,CD-R, DVD-R WIN 7 PRE 64 BIT AOC 23.5 
KeyboardPowerCaseMouse
Kensington POS THERMALTAKE 850 BRONZE V9 BLACK EDITION LOGITECH 518 
Mouse Pad
Vespula 
  hide details  
Reply
    
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
FX8350 Gigabyte 990FX UD3 7950 4x4 Corsiar Dominator 1600 
Hard DriveOptical DriveOSMonitor
x2 Corsair f120's in raid 0 ASUS BUDGET CD, DVD,CD-R, DVD-R WIN 7 PRE 64 BIT AOC 23.5 
KeyboardPowerCaseMouse
Kensington POS THERMALTAKE 850 BRONZE V9 BLACK EDITION LOGITECH 518 
Mouse Pad
Vespula 
  hide details  
Reply
post #12 of 16
FX-8000 will outperform or at least match Westmere Hexacore (Core i7 990X).
Should be faster as well than Sandy Bridge in single threaded application with the help of Turbo Core 2.0. But I think it will be slower than Ivy Bridge or Sandy Bridge E.
    
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
AMD Ryzen 7 1700 3.7 GHz ASRock AB350 Pro4 PowerColor Radeon R9 290 4GB GDDR5 2x 8GB Crucial DDR4 2666 MHz 
Hard DriveHard DriveHard DriveCooling
Samsung SSD 960 EVO 250 GB Samsung Spinpoint HD103SJ 1TB Seagate Barracuda ST4000DM001 4TB OCZ Vendetta 2 
OSMonitorKeyboardPower
Windows 10 Professional LG 25UM58-P 2560x1080 60Hz Power Logic Xenon Sabre Seasonic P760 
CaseMouse
D-Vito 911 Cooler Master CMStorm Sentinal Advance II 
  hide details  
Reply
    
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
AMD Ryzen 7 1700 3.7 GHz ASRock AB350 Pro4 PowerColor Radeon R9 290 4GB GDDR5 2x 8GB Crucial DDR4 2666 MHz 
Hard DriveHard DriveHard DriveCooling
Samsung SSD 960 EVO 250 GB Samsung Spinpoint HD103SJ 1TB Seagate Barracuda ST4000DM001 4TB OCZ Vendetta 2 
OSMonitorKeyboardPower
Windows 10 Professional LG 25UM58-P 2560x1080 60Hz Power Logic Xenon Sabre Seasonic P760 
CaseMouse
D-Vito 911 Cooler Master CMStorm Sentinal Advance II 
  hide details  
Reply
post #13 of 16
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bima Sylirian View Post
FX-8000 will outperform or at least match Westmere Hexacore (Core i7 990X).
Should be faster as well than Sandy Bridge in single threaded application with the help of Turbo Core 2.0. But I think it will be slower than Ivy Bridge or Sandy Bridge E.
Sandy Bridge also has Turbo Boost.
    
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
Core 2 Duo P7450 @2.7GHz Pegatron G60VX (A12) GeForce GTX 260M 1GB @610/1500/2000 Hynix 4GB DDR2 @1000MHz 
Hard DriveOptical DriveOSMonitor
Seagate Momentus 7200.4 320GB LG GSA-T50N, HP dvd1170r Windows 7 Home Premium 64-bit HP W2207 22" (1680x1050) 
KeyboardPowerMouse
Microsoft Digital media Keyboard 3000 Delta Electronics ADP-120ZB BB 120W Logitech G500 
  hide details  
Reply
    
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
Core 2 Duo P7450 @2.7GHz Pegatron G60VX (A12) GeForce GTX 260M 1GB @610/1500/2000 Hynix 4GB DDR2 @1000MHz 
Hard DriveOptical DriveOSMonitor
Seagate Momentus 7200.4 320GB LG GSA-T50N, HP dvd1170r Windows 7 Home Premium 64-bit HP W2207 22" (1680x1050) 
KeyboardPowerMouse
Microsoft Digital media Keyboard 3000 Delta Electronics ADP-120ZB BB 120W Logitech G500 
  hide details  
Reply
post #14 of 16
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bima Sylirian View Post
FX-8000 will outperform or at least match Westmere Hexacore (Core i7 990X).
Should be faster as well than Sandy Bridge in single threaded application with the help of Turbo Core 2.0. But I think it will be slower than Ivy Bridge or Sandy Bridge E.
Man, if they can do that for under $450 AMD will be on a roll.
    
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
AMD FX-8150P GIGABYTE 990FXA-UD5 Dual 5870s G. Skill 8GB 1600MHZ 7-8-7-24 
Hard DriveOptical DriveOSMonitor
Corsair Force3 120GB, 1.5TB, 250GB, 80GB DVD-RW+Fan controller {Windows 7 x64} {ASUS} 23" 1080P LED + Dual Samsung 19" 1280x1024 
KeyboardPowerCaseMouse
Basic Logitech keyboard Xigmatek NRP-MC1002 Silver Xigmatek Elysium w/ window, 15 fans Logitech G9x 
Mouse Pad
Xigmatek 
  hide details  
Reply
    
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
AMD FX-8150P GIGABYTE 990FXA-UD5 Dual 5870s G. Skill 8GB 1600MHZ 7-8-7-24 
Hard DriveOptical DriveOSMonitor
Corsair Force3 120GB, 1.5TB, 250GB, 80GB DVD-RW+Fan controller {Windows 7 x64} {ASUS} 23" 1080P LED + Dual Samsung 19" 1280x1024 
KeyboardPowerCaseMouse
Basic Logitech keyboard Xigmatek NRP-MC1002 Silver Xigmatek Elysium w/ window, 15 fans Logitech G9x 
Mouse Pad
Xigmatek 
  hide details  
Reply
post #15 of 16
Personally I think BD will compete against Intel's Westmere.
Dead Ryzen
(12 items)
 
Penguin Box
(9 items)
 
 
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
AMD RYZEN 7 1800X  MSI B350M MORTAR ARCTIC AMD Radeon Vega Frontier Edition CORSAIR Vengeance LPX 32GB (4 x 8GB - 2133 MHz) 
Hard DriveHard DriveCoolingMonitor
SAMSUNG SSD 950 PRO 512GB Crucial MX300 2TB Noctua NH-U12S  BenQ XL2730Z - 27” 2560x1440 
KeyboardPowerCaseMouse
Das Keyboard 4 Professional Soft Tactile (MX Br... Seasonic X-850(SS-850KM3 Active PFC F3) Fractal Design Define Mini C BenQ ZOWIE EC1-A 
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
Intel Core i7-2600K @4.6 GHz P8Z68-V AMD Radeon RX 480 (ref. design) Mushkin Enhanced Stealth 8GB (2 x 4GB) (PC3 17000) 
Hard DriveCoolingOSPower
SanDisk Extreme PRO 480GB Noctua NH-U12 S Arch Linux Seasonic SS-520FL 520W 
Case
Corsair Vengeance Series C70 
  hide details  
Reply
Dead Ryzen
(12 items)
 
Penguin Box
(9 items)
 
 
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
AMD RYZEN 7 1800X  MSI B350M MORTAR ARCTIC AMD Radeon Vega Frontier Edition CORSAIR Vengeance LPX 32GB (4 x 8GB - 2133 MHz) 
Hard DriveHard DriveCoolingMonitor
SAMSUNG SSD 950 PRO 512GB Crucial MX300 2TB Noctua NH-U12S  BenQ XL2730Z - 27” 2560x1440 
KeyboardPowerCaseMouse
Das Keyboard 4 Professional Soft Tactile (MX Br... Seasonic X-850(SS-850KM3 Active PFC F3) Fractal Design Define Mini C BenQ ZOWIE EC1-A 
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
Intel Core i7-2600K @4.6 GHz P8Z68-V AMD Radeon RX 480 (ref. design) Mushkin Enhanced Stealth 8GB (2 x 4GB) (PC3 17000) 
Hard DriveCoolingOSPower
SanDisk Extreme PRO 480GB Noctua NH-U12 S Arch Linux Seasonic SS-520FL 520W 
Case
Corsair Vengeance Series C70 
  hide details  
Reply
post #16 of 16
Quote:
Originally Posted by LOL_Wut_Axel View Post
I predict it will have about the same IPC as Nehalem/Lynnfield but will be able to make up for it with more cores in comparison to Intel.
Basically this.

Though, I hope that AMD found a way to being faster than Nehalem even if it is only by about 5%. The arch has been out for a while so that should have been AMD's goal.

Given that, the 8130p FX chip should be the new king -- a little faster than the 990x in benchmark that use all cores available effectively.
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: AMD - General
Overclock.net › Forums › AMD › AMD - General › overclockersunited Q/A: How do you think AMD Bulldozer processors will do?