Overclock.net › Forums › Benchmarks › Benchmarking Software and Discussion › Ridicules 3dMark Vantage results, can someone explain?
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

Ridicules 3dMark Vantage results, can someone explain? - Page 2

post #11 of 12
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by tats View Post
I tried to not post this, but ridicules ≠ ridiculous.

My troll urge is too stong when I'm stuck at work waiting for a conference call....
I'm french... so I blame it on hotmail spell check
My AMD/ATI build
(13 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
AMD FX-8350 (4..60Ghz) Gigabyte 990FXA-UD5 XFX R9-290 G.SKILL 8GB DDR3-1600Mhz 7-8-7-24 
Hard DriveOSMonitorPower
OCZ Vertex 2 Windows 7 Home 42 Inch Panasonic 1080p Plasma Antec Truepower 750W 
  hide details  
Reply
My AMD/ATI build
(13 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
AMD FX-8350 (4..60Ghz) Gigabyte 990FXA-UD5 XFX R9-290 G.SKILL 8GB DDR3-1600Mhz 7-8-7-24 
Hard DriveOSMonitorPower
OCZ Vertex 2 Windows 7 Home 42 Inch Panasonic 1080p Plasma Antec Truepower 750W 
  hide details  
Reply
post #12 of 12
The free version of Vantage defaults to Performance level so thats what most people use...
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
Overclock.net › Forums › Benchmarks › Benchmarking Software and Discussion › Ridicules 3dMark Vantage results, can someone explain?