Overclock.net › Forums › Video Games › PC Gaming › Duke Nukem Forever Demo
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

Duke Nukem Forever Demo - Page 19

post #181 of 183
Quote:
Originally Posted by Saq View Post
The game is very high demanding indeed. I had to uninstall after making it to the second level because of graphical glitches, and severe no clipping issue's (similar to doom when you make the graphics turn into a tube tunnel)


Has to be AMD/ATI only issue or something. My sig rig runs it fine, no way should you be having any "performance issues".

Quote:
Originally Posted by sew333 View Post
GUYS. After demo my opinion is: SUPERB! This game will be one of my favorite off all times!
Graphics is nice, but gameplay is more more fantastic. Cant wait for full release. THis game reminds me of old DUKE, but with cool graphic and gameplay. I played on max details with FSAA , and i get smooth like butter gameplay

Anyway in next month i buying next 570 gtx to make SLI
Not for this game I hope? Better up it to FXAA (I think that's a bit sharper at distances) .


Quote:
Originally Posted by Murlocke View Post
I was not impressed by the demo. Won't live up to the hype in my opinion. Tons of glitches for me, especially with the mine carts. For 12 years it surely doesn't feel polished.

Now if the game is like ~40 hours long I could see why it took so long to make, but my guess it will be 6-12 hours like every standard shooter.
Umm it wasn't developed for 12 years, it was started, stopped and restarted over those years. This actual game probably took about a year, when Gearbox picked it up it probably only had some concept art and a handful of maps.

Quote:
Originally Posted by tha d0ctor View Post
Great games yes, but on the level of Duke and Blood... nope

Decent was great too
Umm no offense but Duke and Blood are garbage compared to Quake. All are great but they don't even compare to Quake. Quake (and id) made multiplayer FPS gaming what it is today. If you're talking about purely single player campaign then yeah, I can (sort of) agree with you that Quake wasn't as good.
Edited by Am* - 6/5/11 at 1:25pm
    
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
Intel Celeron G530 Haven't decided yet. GTX 460 768MB 4GB Ripjaws 
Hard DriveOSMonitorPower
Samsung F3 1TB (SSD coming later) XP/Windows 7 Same old... Yet to decide. 
Case
Fractal Design Define R3 
  hide details  
Reply
    
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
Intel Celeron G530 Haven't decided yet. GTX 460 768MB 4GB Ripjaws 
Hard DriveOSMonitorPower
Samsung F3 1TB (SSD coming later) XP/Windows 7 Same old... Yet to decide. 
Case
Fractal Design Define R3 
  hide details  
Reply
post #182 of 183
Quote:
Originally Posted by luanswan2002 View Post
No originality? There was nothing like Quake 1 and 2
Really? Quake was an exact replica of Doom. Except in 3d.

Quote:
when they were released and both games were praised reviews wise
So what? Justin Bieber is incredibly popular, he won tons of award and got praised in reviews.

Quote:
Saying Half-Life 1 is better than Quake 2 is just an opinion.
Well, what did you think I was saying? Some ultimate truth? Of course it's an opinion. Jeez, I absolutely hate when people are trying to point out that "hey, buddy, X is actually an opinion". Of course it's a opinion, it's bloody obvious!

Quote:
Half-Life 1 is built off the foundations of Quake 2
Yep, the engine is a modified Quake engine. And that's about it, 'cause it wasn't build on foundations of Quake, let alone Quake 2 which it has little, if anything at all to do with.

Quote:
And Quake 3 is a great game, I've yet to play a better deathmatch/duel game.
Unreal Tournament.

Quote:
You don't know how popular is once was
Really? I actually do know how popular it was and still is ('cause the formula hasn't changed one bit). I just don't care. Counter-Strike was and still is incredibly popular, but I think CS is crap.

Quote:
whereas UT is pretty much dead.
Really? I dare you to check how many UT and UT2k4 servers are there, TONS of people still play these games.
Datalinks
(13 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
i5 2500k @4.0ghz 1.2v, ~50c under load P8P67 Pro 1502 8600GT 2x4gb @1600mhz 7-8-7-24 1.6v 
Hard DriveOSMonitorPower
HD103SJ 1tb Win7 x64 T710BH SeaSonic M12II 620w 
  hide details  
Reply
Datalinks
(13 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
i5 2500k @4.0ghz 1.2v, ~50c under load P8P67 Pro 1502 8600GT 2x4gb @1600mhz 7-8-7-24 1.6v 
Hard DriveOSMonitorPower
HD103SJ 1tb Win7 x64 T710BH SeaSonic M12II 620w 
  hide details  
Reply
post #183 of 183
Blasphemy

Sent from my DROID2 using Tapatalk
nVidia Surround
(13 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
Q6600 @ 3.2GHz XFX 780i EVGA + ZOTAC 480GTX SLI 2 x 2GB G. Skill DDR2 @ 800MHz 
Hard DriveOptical DriveOSMonitor
Hitachi 2x250GB RAID 0 LG DVD + R/W Windows 7 x64 Professional 3 x Acer GD235HZ 120Hz 2ms 
KeyboardPowerCaseMouse
Microsoft Ergonomic Keyboard 1220W KingWin Mach 1 Coolermaster HAF - X Razer Deathadder 
Mouse Pad
Razer eXactMat 
  hide details  
Reply
nVidia Surround
(13 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
Q6600 @ 3.2GHz XFX 780i EVGA + ZOTAC 480GTX SLI 2 x 2GB G. Skill DDR2 @ 800MHz 
Hard DriveOptical DriveOSMonitor
Hitachi 2x250GB RAID 0 LG DVD + R/W Windows 7 x64 Professional 3 x Acer GD235HZ 120Hz 2ms 
KeyboardPowerCaseMouse
Microsoft Ergonomic Keyboard 1220W KingWin Mach 1 Coolermaster HAF - X Razer Deathadder 
Mouse Pad
Razer eXactMat 
  hide details  
Reply
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: PC Gaming
Overclock.net › Forums › Video Games › PC Gaming › Duke Nukem Forever Demo