Originally Posted by Kaldari
The tech of a CRT also puts more strain on the eyes in how it refreshes, it's 5x as big, and 5x as heavy.
Oh, and it's 4:3.
Face it, not everyone wants your monitors (most don't?).
So? That was not the point of my post there. My post indicated agreement on that 120hz = Good
I appreciate the quality of my monitor the most of my three monitors, so I use it as a main and the side ones are 24" LCDs. Problem?
THe sony FW900 is 16:10 @ 2304x1440. If you're looking for a monitor that is best suited for every kind of gaming, you should look no further. It's just impossible for me to acquire one, living in finland. 4:3 does fine for me. I appreciate the image quality more than the amount of FOV I have.
It's pretty much literally impossible for me to see the flicker at 85hz. It's easier on the eyes than my LCDs, since both have dithering (like almost all TN panels) and the other has very slight backlight flicker. What about that eye strain again?
Size and weight are no issue to me
Besides, you just went completely off topic and replied in a way that related in no way whatsoever to what I said, so....
EDIT: Oh, and your resolution is 1920x1080. I could pick on that but whatever.