Overclock.net › Forums › Video Games › PC Gaming › Crysis Warhead vs Crysis Performance
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

Crysis Warhead vs Crysis Performance

post #1 of 3
Thread Starter 
I was playing crysis and I was only seeing 65% usage of my GPU, while it only looked like 1 core was being used, Is crysis warhead better at using 4 cores than Crysis and not bottlenecking?
MetalMachine
(13 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
Phenom iix6 1100t Be Asus M4A87TD EVO Sapphire Raedon HD 6870 8 gig DDR 3 
Hard DriveOptical DriveOSMonitor
1 TB 7200 LightScribe Windows 7 Viewsonic VX2450wm-LED 24" 
PowerCase
Antec Earthwatts Ea-650 Green NZXT Beta Evo 
  hide details  
Reply
MetalMachine
(13 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
Phenom iix6 1100t Be Asus M4A87TD EVO Sapphire Raedon HD 6870 8 gig DDR 3 
Hard DriveOptical DriveOSMonitor
1 TB 7200 LightScribe Windows 7 Viewsonic VX2450wm-LED 24" 
PowerCase
Antec Earthwatts Ea-650 Green NZXT Beta Evo 
  hide details  
Reply
post #2 of 3
Crysis Warhead is newer & better optimized as well. And it is better at supporting multi-core processors than original Crysis.
Desktop
(16 items)
 
Laptop
(10 items)
 
 
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
Intel Core i7-5820K @ 4.40 GHz Asus Rampage V Extreme/U3.1 MSI GTX 980 Ti Gaming 6GB  Corsair Vengeance LPX 16GB (4x4) DDR4-3000 
Hard DriveHard DriveCoolingOS
Samsung 850 Pro 1TB Samsung 950 Pro NVMe 512GB NZXT Kraken X62 Windows 10 Pro 
MonitorMonitorKeyboardPower
Asus VG236H 23" 120 Sony XBR43X800D 43" 4K TV CoolerMaster Octane Storm + Razer Turret EVGA SuperNOVA 1000 G3 
CaseMouseMouse PadAudio
Corsair Graphite 760T Black Logitech G502 Proteus Spectrum + Razer Turret Razer Goliathus Asus Xonar Essence STX II 
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
Intel Core i7-4720HQ @ 2.60 GHz Asus G751JY Asus GTX 980M 4GB SK hynix HMT41GS6BFR8A-PB 16GB (2x8) DDR3L-1600 
Hard DriveHard DriveOptical DriveOS
SanDisk SD7SB3Q128G1002  HGST Travelstar 7K1000 1TB HL-DT-ST DVDRAM GUC0N Windows 10 Home 64-bit 
MonitorAudio
LG Philips LP173WF4-SPD1 + G-SYNC @ 75 Hz Realtek ALC668 
  hide details  
Reply
Desktop
(16 items)
 
Laptop
(10 items)
 
 
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
Intel Core i7-5820K @ 4.40 GHz Asus Rampage V Extreme/U3.1 MSI GTX 980 Ti Gaming 6GB  Corsair Vengeance LPX 16GB (4x4) DDR4-3000 
Hard DriveHard DriveCoolingOS
Samsung 850 Pro 1TB Samsung 950 Pro NVMe 512GB NZXT Kraken X62 Windows 10 Pro 
MonitorMonitorKeyboardPower
Asus VG236H 23" 120 Sony XBR43X800D 43" 4K TV CoolerMaster Octane Storm + Razer Turret EVGA SuperNOVA 1000 G3 
CaseMouseMouse PadAudio
Corsair Graphite 760T Black Logitech G502 Proteus Spectrum + Razer Turret Razer Goliathus Asus Xonar Essence STX II 
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
Intel Core i7-4720HQ @ 2.60 GHz Asus G751JY Asus GTX 980M 4GB SK hynix HMT41GS6BFR8A-PB 16GB (2x8) DDR3L-1600 
Hard DriveHard DriveOptical DriveOS
SanDisk SD7SB3Q128G1002  HGST Travelstar 7K1000 1TB HL-DT-ST DVDRAM GUC0N Windows 10 Home 64-bit 
MonitorAudio
LG Philips LP173WF4-SPD1 + G-SYNC @ 75 Hz Realtek ALC668 
  hide details  
Reply
post #3 of 3
crysis warhead uses 2 cores and maybe a 3rd core too once in a while..
and fps increase is also good...
for eg i used to get fps in 30's-40's but in warhead it was in 50's-70's
so it was definitely good... smile.gif


1.6k post...... biggrin.gif
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: PC Gaming
Overclock.net › Forums › Video Games › PC Gaming › Crysis Warhead vs Crysis Performance