I'm saying you have absolutely no grounds on which to declare them wrong. You don't have even the slightest inkling of understanding what's actually at work on the issues.
It's very likely they're right, because as we gain more and more data, it has fit into predictions made. This isn't just some wild random idea come up with by some guy - there've been thousands of people working on it with mountains of data. Now the climate system is complex, so there's room for error - but the error probably isn't "is global warming actually happening" but more along the lines of "how much is happening, what exactly is causing it, how much is it human vs natural causes", etc.
If it comes down to 99% of actual experts on the subject, who have data, who have seen their predictions proven correct, and some random guys on the internet going LOL U IDIOTS, I'm pretty sure I know where I'd put my money.
Originally Posted by Nihsnek
You don't have to be a scientist to tell the "global warming" jargon is a load of crap.
Really? Then how are you coming to your conclusions? Are you looking at the data and making your own analysis? Are you running the simulations to figure out what's going on?
What are you basing that on? Your gut feeling?