Quote:
Originally Posted by The Sandman 
My scores make me feel sick. As if I MUST be doing something wrong lol. I admittedly still have a lot to learn with my new setup, but come on
At this stage of the game I too have my doubts.

Can anyone explain why the values are so different between the two benchs above?
Any chance there could be an issue with MemMaxx and Vishera. There seems to be an on going debate with how Prime95 runs on the new FX.
I realize I am "getting out there", just call it wishful thinking lol. My 1090T would kick this Piledrivers backside with it's scores but that was a 8GB kit at 9-11-9-28-39-1T at 2006MHz on my Crosshair IV


My scores make me feel sick. As if I MUST be doing something wrong lol. I admittedly still have a lot to learn with my new setup, but come on

At this stage of the game I too have my doubts.
Can anyone explain why the values are so different between the two benchs above?
Any chance there could be an issue with MemMaxx and Vishera. There seems to be an on going debate with how Prime95 runs on the new FX.
I realize I am "getting out there", just call it wishful thinking lol. My 1090T would kick this Piledrivers backside with it's scores but that was a 8GB kit at 9-11-9-28-39-1T at 2006MHz on my Crosshair IV
i kinda have a clue dude... and i commented it a couple of months ago.....
the last 2 bios that have been released, do something to the memory controller on the mobo, or whatsoever... in my case, my current scores SUCK... but i mean suck with capitalized letters and screaming....

















Definately frustrating! The temperature rollercoaster is another one. Put high hopes on this chip and am definately starting to regret getting rid of the 1100T. No worries though, another will be on it's way shortly!
. Wish the Aida64 memory tests were free. It's much more consistent and reliable.