The suits are the same because it's over infringed PATENTS. A patent is a patent is a patent. It doesn't matter if you agree with it, disagree with it, love it or hate it.
The button on the iPad alone is enough to throw out the case at it does not follow the design.
Since non of their products resemble this patent, as the button alone is enough to claim a difference, then we know Apple is not protecting their assets, but to protect themselves for market dominance. Why else patent a general "slate" design that is not one of their retailed products? I can already point out 3 differences...
Edited by Domino - 8/13/11 at 3:41pm