Originally Posted by Viridian
I've got 656 kills and 450 of them are HS', my point was I'm good with the SV98 and I'm good with Recon, but I still think an upper body
hit should be a one hit kill. I always aim for the head because I know that's a 1 hit kill.
But hey, I'm not whinging (for a change) I had the same complaint about BC2. It's not a deal breaker, though. If you want a whinge about BF3 it's that as far as I know dragging a team mate to cover isn't included in the multiplayer
I was looking forward to that!
Ok, in comparison, I have only ever killed by headshot with the M95 Specact. I win
Ok, I admit I only have 1 kill with the M95 Specact... But the logic is still flawed. Why does it matter if you're good with it or not? There are lots of reasons why a sniper rifle should not 1HK to the upper body (like, say, game balance, fair gameplay, and game balance), but only 1 reason why it should (realism). And realism is a REALLY bad reason why a sniper rifle should kill in 1 shot, 'cause then all weapons have to be 1 or 2HK.
BTW, I've got 411 kills and 227 headshots.