Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Wishmaker
If BD > than SB / IVY, why didn't they release any benchmarks?
 |
OT- The article is from WCCF,take anything from them with a pile of salt.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Jagged_Steel
A little update on the chinese site linked in the article: I don't recommend going there- at all. After I got warned by Avast that it blocked a trojan, IE started acting up and began bogging down. I thought this might just be due to the chinese text pack thing, so I rebooted. But, when I logged back on to IE I discovered that all of my passwords- etc had been cleared- not a good sign. I ran a scan and didn't find anything other than the regular 100 tracking cookies, but I still think that chinese sources site is an attack site. Be careful if you go there.
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by BallaTheFeared
AMD has a long track record of going "hey look at me" when their product is better than what is currently out.
The silence. The delay. The poor performance of leaked benchmarks. All signs point to AMD not pulling off a "conroe" on Sandy Bridge. I'm sure it will be a good chip, just not earth shattering for Intel at least. |
Edited by Heavy MG - 8/29/11 at 2:23pm
Insert cool name here
(14 items) |
|
Insert cool name here
(14 items) |
