Overclock.net › Forums › Industry News › Video Game News › [TS] Battlefield 3 Beta Performance Test
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

[TS] Battlefield 3 Beta Performance Test - Page 2

post #11 of 20
Sounds like I need a second 480..

I game at 1920x1200.
Main PC
(10 items)
 
File Server
(11 items)
 
 
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
i5 2550k ASUS Maximus V GENE EVGA GeForce GTX 660 Ti+ 3GB w/Backplate 16GB Kingston Hyper-X 
Hard DriveHard DriveCoolingOS
2x Kingston HyperX 3K RAID 0 Seagate USB 3.0 External Drive Thermalright Venomous X Windows 10 Pro x64 
MonitorPower
3x 22" Dell Ultrasharp Corsair CX500 
CPUMotherboardRAMHard Drive
amd a10-7700k ASrock FM2A88M-HD+ Corsair Dominator 2x2GB Toshiba 
Hard DriveHard DriveHard DriveHard Drive
Toshiba Western Digital Green Western Digital Black Western Digital Green 
OSPowerCase
Windows Professional 8.1 OCZ 650W Antec 300 
  hide details  
Reply
Main PC
(10 items)
 
File Server
(11 items)
 
 
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
i5 2550k ASUS Maximus V GENE EVGA GeForce GTX 660 Ti+ 3GB w/Backplate 16GB Kingston Hyper-X 
Hard DriveHard DriveCoolingOS
2x Kingston HyperX 3K RAID 0 Seagate USB 3.0 External Drive Thermalright Venomous X Windows 10 Pro x64 
MonitorPower
3x 22" Dell Ultrasharp Corsair CX500 
CPUMotherboardRAMHard Drive
amd a10-7700k ASrock FM2A88M-HD+ Corsair Dominator 2x2GB Toshiba 
Hard DriveHard DriveHard DriveHard Drive
Toshiba Western Digital Green Western Digital Black Western Digital Green 
OSPowerCase
Windows Professional 8.1 OCZ 650W Antec 300 
  hide details  
Reply
post #12 of 20
I noticed how again... people keep thinking that a higher res like 2560x1600 is going to actually help in gaming but, in realality is really holding back your frames per second.... When are they going to stop screwing around and use a 120hz monitor? Screw the resolution we want more results and those monitors they are using only hit 59hz? wow -_- plus they ms is prolly high too. Believe me fellas that DOES matter ALOT, you can really see a difference in performance vs. not using 120hz. Those fools, wasting time over there when guys on OCN have systems 10 times better that make sense lol. Yes I do understand not most people will have a 120hz monitor, so I am assuming that this is only a base test and I guess we will have to wait for the full product. I still super disagree with resolutions that are higher than 1920x1080 right now because most monitors that go over that are slow... ms and are only capped to 60hz ... given the fact that most 120hz monitor are really meant for stupid-gimmick 3D which I don't really use ever although is fun to look at if you want something different.
    
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
Intel®Core™ i7-6920HQ  MSI GT80S 6QF-072 MXM GTX 980 SLI Kingston HyperXImpact CL14 Dual Channel 8GB X4 
Hard DriveHard DriveOptical DriveOS
Samsung 950 Pro 512 GB X2 Samsung 850 Pro 2TB ASUS Blu-Ray/ Asus CD Burner Windows 10 Home 64-Bit (Came with laptop) 
MonitorKeyboardPowerCase
Acer HN274H BMIIID 3D 27-Inch LED Monitor - Black SteelSeries 6Gv2 Mechanical Gaming Keyboard Bui... 330W Power Brick MSI GT80S Titan 
MouseMouse PadAudioOther
Logitec Proteus Core Whatever works! Nahimic Sound Wireless Killer 1535 
  hide details  
Reply
    
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
Intel®Core™ i7-6920HQ  MSI GT80S 6QF-072 MXM GTX 980 SLI Kingston HyperXImpact CL14 Dual Channel 8GB X4 
Hard DriveHard DriveOptical DriveOS
Samsung 950 Pro 512 GB X2 Samsung 850 Pro 2TB ASUS Blu-Ray/ Asus CD Burner Windows 10 Home 64-Bit (Came with laptop) 
MonitorKeyboardPowerCase
Acer HN274H BMIIID 3D 27-Inch LED Monitor - Black SteelSeries 6Gv2 Mechanical Gaming Keyboard Bui... 330W Power Brick MSI GT80S Titan 
MouseMouse PadAudioOther
Logitec Proteus Core Whatever works! Nahimic Sound Wireless Killer 1535 
  hide details  
Reply
post #13 of 20
wow GTX 590 scaling is pretty awesome too, but to tbh ive seen higher numbers on my rig.
Haswell-E
(15 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
I7 5960X ASUS Sabertooth X99 GTX TITAN X SLI Corsair Veneance LPX 16GB (4x4GB) DDR4 
Hard DriveHard DriveCoolingOS
Intel 750 400GB Samsung 850 Evo Pro 1TB EK EVO WaterBlock / EK Titan X WaterBlock / XSP... Windows 10 Pro x64 
MonitorMonitorKeyboardPower
Acer x34 GSYNC 100hz ASUS PG278Q 1440p 144hz Corsair Strafe  EVGA 850 WATT 
CaseMouse
Corsair 750D  Razer DeathAdder Chroma  
  hide details  
Reply
Haswell-E
(15 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
I7 5960X ASUS Sabertooth X99 GTX TITAN X SLI Corsair Veneance LPX 16GB (4x4GB) DDR4 
Hard DriveHard DriveCoolingOS
Intel 750 400GB Samsung 850 Evo Pro 1TB EK EVO WaterBlock / EK Titan X WaterBlock / XSP... Windows 10 Pro x64 
MonitorMonitorKeyboardPower
Acer x34 GSYNC 100hz ASUS PG278Q 1440p 144hz Corsair Strafe  EVGA 850 WATT 
CaseMouse
Corsair 750D  Razer DeathAdder Chroma  
  hide details  
Reply
post #14 of 20
Quote:
Originally Posted by SniperXX View Post
Sounds like I need a second 480..

I game at 1920x1200.
got the same setup as you! plus one more 480 same res and everything.
If you want to play on ultra grab another 480 otherwise high settings give me 60+ fps anywhere

For the beta ive been playing with sli off and at high settings and it runs great.
i5 GTX 690
(15 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
i5 3570K @ 5ghz OC ASRock Z77 OC Formula EVGA GTX 690 Patriot Viper 3 16GB DDR3 
Hard DriveCoolingOSMonitor
OCZ Vertex 3x4 in raid 0 & Seagate 500GB x2 in ... XSPC Raystorm 750 RX240 Windows 8 64bit Asus VG236H 
KeyboardPowerCaseMouse
G19 CORSAIR Professional Series Gold AX850 NZXT Phantom G400 
Audio
RB - 41 II Bookshelf Speakers + Polk SW111 Sub 
  hide details  
Reply
i5 GTX 690
(15 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
i5 3570K @ 5ghz OC ASRock Z77 OC Formula EVGA GTX 690 Patriot Viper 3 16GB DDR3 
Hard DriveCoolingOSMonitor
OCZ Vertex 3x4 in raid 0 & Seagate 500GB x2 in ... XSPC Raystorm 750 RX240 Windows 8 64bit Asus VG236H 
KeyboardPowerCaseMouse
G19 CORSAIR Professional Series Gold AX850 NZXT Phantom G400 
Audio
RB - 41 II Bookshelf Speakers + Polk SW111 Sub 
  hide details  
Reply
post #15 of 20
the 590 seems to be doing pretty nicely
 
Benching
(17 items)
 
 
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
[i7 5960X @ 4.8GHz] [Rampage V Extreme] [Titan 1400MHz (1500MHz bench)] [Various] 
Hard DriveCoolingCoolingCooling
[250GB 840EVO +2x SpinpointF3 1TB RAID0] [LD PC-V2 SS Phase Change] [XSPC X2O 750 pump/res] [Monsta 360 full copper + EK XT 360 + XT 240] 
MonitorPowerCaseAudio
[Crossover 27Q LED-P 1440p+ASUS 1200p+LG 1080p] [Corsair AX1200] [Dimastech Easy v3.0] [Sennheiser HD558s] 
CPUCPUMotherboardGraphics
FX 8320, FX 8350, Phenom II x2 555BE i7 3930K, i7 860, i7 4770K, 68x Celeron D CVF, commando, 2x RIVE, Z87X-OC Asus 4870x2, Sapphire 4870 
GraphicsGraphicsGraphicsGraphics
2x 5870, 5850, 5830, 5770 2x 3870x2, 3870 GTX Titan, GTX 480, GTX 590 GTX 285, GTX 260, 4x 9800GT, 8800GTX 
RAMHard DriveCoolingCooling
4x4GB vengeance, 2x4GB predatorX, 2x1GB OCZ DDR2 Intel X25-M 80GB LD PC-V2 SS Phase Change OCN Marksman 
CoolingCoolingOSPower
2x old tek slims (GPU) Various watercooling stuff win7, winxp AX1200 
Case
test bench / cardboard box 
  hide details  
Reply
 
Benching
(17 items)
 
 
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
[i7 5960X @ 4.8GHz] [Rampage V Extreme] [Titan 1400MHz (1500MHz bench)] [Various] 
Hard DriveCoolingCoolingCooling
[250GB 840EVO +2x SpinpointF3 1TB RAID0] [LD PC-V2 SS Phase Change] [XSPC X2O 750 pump/res] [Monsta 360 full copper + EK XT 360 + XT 240] 
MonitorPowerCaseAudio
[Crossover 27Q LED-P 1440p+ASUS 1200p+LG 1080p] [Corsair AX1200] [Dimastech Easy v3.0] [Sennheiser HD558s] 
CPUCPUMotherboardGraphics
FX 8320, FX 8350, Phenom II x2 555BE i7 3930K, i7 860, i7 4770K, 68x Celeron D CVF, commando, 2x RIVE, Z87X-OC Asus 4870x2, Sapphire 4870 
GraphicsGraphicsGraphicsGraphics
2x 5870, 5850, 5830, 5770 2x 3870x2, 3870 GTX Titan, GTX 480, GTX 590 GTX 285, GTX 260, 4x 9800GT, 8800GTX 
RAMHard DriveCoolingCooling
4x4GB vengeance, 2x4GB predatorX, 2x1GB OCZ DDR2 Intel X25-M 80GB LD PC-V2 SS Phase Change OCN Marksman 
CoolingCoolingOSPower
2x old tek slims (GPU) Various watercooling stuff win7, winxp AX1200 
Case
test bench / cardboard box 
  hide details  
Reply
post #16 of 20
Surprised the I3 did so well. All I ever hear in this forum is that the i3 is crap.
post #17 of 20
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Frankzro View Post
Hmm this amlost looked like a repost... really does. Someone posted something similar yesterday or so.
That was on a different site. Techspot barely released their BF3 beta tests today.
post #18 of 20
i game at 1680 x 1024.....so im pretty sure im gimping the game because im too cheap to get a better monitor...lol
Hexamonster
(14 items)
 
MSI TITAN GT80
(5 items)
 
 
CPUMotherboardGraphicsGraphics
Phenom 2 1075t ASRock 990FX Extreme3  Sapphire 6950 Dirt3 Edition  MSI 6950  
RAMHard DriveOptical DriveOS
8Gig G.Skill Sniper 1333 Western Digital Raptor Samsung DVD+RW Windows 7 (64)/Windows 8 Consumer 
MonitorKeyboardPowerCase
Acer G245HQABD 23.6" LCD Monitor  Logitech k360 Antec 1000W NZXT Phanton Green/Black Edition 
Mouse
CAT 7 
CPUGraphicsHard DriveHard Drive
Intel Core i7 4720 SLI NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980M  Raid SSD 128gig Hard Drives 1tb Backup Drive 
Optical Drive
Bluray Drive 
  hide details  
Reply
Hexamonster
(14 items)
 
MSI TITAN GT80
(5 items)
 
 
CPUMotherboardGraphicsGraphics
Phenom 2 1075t ASRock 990FX Extreme3  Sapphire 6950 Dirt3 Edition  MSI 6950  
RAMHard DriveOptical DriveOS
8Gig G.Skill Sniper 1333 Western Digital Raptor Samsung DVD+RW Windows 7 (64)/Windows 8 Consumer 
MonitorKeyboardPowerCase
Acer G245HQABD 23.6" LCD Monitor  Logitech k360 Antec 1000W NZXT Phanton Green/Black Edition 
Mouse
CAT 7 
CPUGraphicsHard DriveHard Drive
Intel Core i7 4720 SLI NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980M  Raid SSD 128gig Hard Drives 1tb Backup Drive 
Optical Drive
Bluray Drive 
  hide details  
Reply
post #19 of 20
Well my i950 and X2 handles the game fine for now. Waiting to decide on if/when I get new cards till the game is out.

Im running my at 1080p and a mix of high and Ultra, no AA and no motion blur.
post #20 of 20
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sylon View Post
They need to compare it to stuff like the Qxxx series of quads. So people like me, who're still on 775 systems can see if it's worth the upgrade...would be nice.
Just pretend you're running an AMD PhenomII with similar number of cores and clock speed, and you'd be pretty close.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Don Karnage View Post
Surprised the I3 did so well. All I ever hear in this forum is that the i3 is crap.
The i3 is NOT crap, the s1156 i3 were amazing, and clocked like demons. It's just such a huge pity that Intel put the chains on the SB-i3, which makes it pointless at stock (which is all you can run it at). The SB-i3 *could* have been the favourite chip of these forums, but locked down? eehnope.
Edited by allikat - 10/4/11 at 9:48am
Ryzen 5 1600
(12 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
AMD Ryzen 5 1600 MSI B350 Gaming Plus Gigabyte GeForce GTX 1060 WINDFORCE2 OC 16GB (2x8GB) Corsair DDR4 Vengeance LED, PC4-24... 
Hard DriveHard DriveCoolingOS
256GB Samsung PM961 Polaris M.2 NVMe  1TB Toshiba DT01ACA100 3.5" HDD, SATA III  Cooler Master Hyper 212 Evo Windows 10 64 
KeyboardPowerCaseMouse
Unicomp Model M 650W EVGA SuperNOVA G1, 80PLUS Gold, Full Modular Kolink Luminosity Cooler Master Reaper Aluminium 
  hide details  
Reply
Ryzen 5 1600
(12 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
AMD Ryzen 5 1600 MSI B350 Gaming Plus Gigabyte GeForce GTX 1060 WINDFORCE2 OC 16GB (2x8GB) Corsair DDR4 Vengeance LED, PC4-24... 
Hard DriveHard DriveCoolingOS
256GB Samsung PM961 Polaris M.2 NVMe  1TB Toshiba DT01ACA100 3.5" HDD, SATA III  Cooler Master Hyper 212 Evo Windows 10 64 
KeyboardPowerCaseMouse
Unicomp Model M 650W EVGA SuperNOVA G1, 80PLUS Gold, Full Modular Kolink Luminosity Cooler Master Reaper Aluminium 
  hide details  
Reply
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: Video Game News
Overclock.net › Forums › Industry News › Video Game News › [TS] Battlefield 3 Beta Performance Test