Overclock.net › Forums › Industry News › Rumors and Unconfirmed Articles › (PCM) Leaked dutch FX 8150 review!
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

(PCM) Leaked dutch FX 8150 review! - Page 12  

post #111 of 448
Quote:
Originally Posted by hheemmpp View Post
Its really annoying when people say they expected more.. AMD can't just take the lead over intel with one little processor enhancement they need time and right now they are doing good and eventually they'll start to make better and better chips..
also those same people would be complaining at the price if amd did take the lead.t you would see $700 cpu's from amd. I am happy with this performance(if true) compared to the price point. if you can easily get 5.0 and maybe 5.5 this chip might beat the more expensive 2600k.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Blameless View Post
Stock.
thanks. so all were at stock. maybe my above statement is correct.
post #112 of 448
Quote:
Originally Posted by hheemmpp View Post
Its really annoying when people say they expected more.. AMD can't just take the lead over intel with one little processor enhancement they need time and right now they are doing good and eventually they'll start to make better and better chips..
Really dude?

They have been working on this longer than you obviously are aware of.
post #113 of 448
Another detail that seems to have been ignored is 3dmark11.

i7 965 + HD5970 = 7385
FX8150 + HD5970 = 6616

Are you really satisfied with buying that kind of performance in the winter of 2011?
post #114 of 448
Quote:
Originally Posted by M1nUrThr3t View Post
Really dude?

They have been working on this longer than you obviously are aware of.
again, if amd did beat intel, this would mean the end of budget built PC's. Do you really think intel would lower there prices? no, they wouldnt.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Derp View Post
Another detail that seems to have been ignored is 3dmark11.

i7 965 + HD5970 = 7385
FX8150 + HD5970 = 6616

Are you really satisfied with buying that kind of performance in the winter of 2011?
and again, we are looking at something that is not optimized at all yet. and this may not even be the final version...
post #115 of 448
Those gaming benchmarks are pretty disappointing.
post #116 of 448
Quote:
Originally Posted by RussianJ View Post
5ghz? Psh, watch OCN pull 5.5 stable. Going to jump chip to chip until I can hit 5.3ghz or higher. They said 4.4 stable on a PII was impsasable but hit that too.

proof please. ive never heard of a stable p2 doing 4.4ghz. or
    
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
Intel I7 2600k Asus p8p67-Deluxe Zotac GTX780 6GB OC G-skill Ripjaws 1866 
Hard DriveHard DriveHard DriveOptical Drive
Samsung 840 EVO 250 Samsung EVO 120 Western Digital 1TB Black Lite On 20x DVD RW 
CoolingOSOSOS
XSPC RayStorm + 360Extreme Rad Arch Linux Windows 8.1 x64 WindowsRE 
MonitorKeyboardPowerCase
Asus PB278Q ThermalTake Meka G1 Evga SuperNova 1000 P2 Xigmatek Elysium 
MouseMouse PadAudio
Logitec G500 Gaming Mouse Ultra Pad Fiio E-17 + ATH-M50 
  hide details  
    
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
Intel I7 2600k Asus p8p67-Deluxe Zotac GTX780 6GB OC G-skill Ripjaws 1866 
Hard DriveHard DriveHard DriveOptical Drive
Samsung 840 EVO 250 Samsung EVO 120 Western Digital 1TB Black Lite On 20x DVD RW 
CoolingOSOSOS
XSPC RayStorm + 360Extreme Rad Arch Linux Windows 8.1 x64 WindowsRE 
MonitorKeyboardPowerCase
Asus PB278Q ThermalTake Meka G1 Evga SuperNova 1000 P2 Xigmatek Elysium 
MouseMouse PadAudio
Logitec G500 Gaming Mouse Ultra Pad Fiio E-17 + ATH-M50 
  hide details  
post #117 of 448
Quote:
Originally Posted by ThePath View Post
If this news is true, then that means that bulldozer have lower IPC than Phenom
In some tasks I would expect this to be the case.

Very few architectural shifts result in improved IPC in everything. There are usually a few situations where things don't noticeably improve, or even get slightly worse.

Cinebench makes pretty heavy use of double precision FP, but doesn't take advantage of AVX or the like. It's not implausible that six Phenom II FPUs can match, or beat, four BD FPUs in some situations, especially those that have no awareness/optimization for the changes to BDs architecture.
Primary
(15 items)
 
Secondary
(13 items)
 
In progress
(10 items)
 
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
5820K @ 4.3/3.6GHz core/uncore, 1.225/1.2v Gigabyte X99 SOC Champion (F22n) 2x Sapphire R9 290X Tri-X OC New Edition (10036... 4x4GiB Crucial @ 2667, 12-11-12-27-T1, 1.37v 
Hard DriveHard DriveHard DriveCooling
Plextor M6e 128GB (fw 1.05) M.2 (PCI-E 2.0 2x) 2x Crucial M4 256GB 4x WD Scorpio Black 500GB Cooler Master Nepton 280L 
OSMonitorKeyboardPower
Windows 7 Professional x64 SP1 BenQ BL3200PT Filco Majestouch Tenkeyless (MX Brown) Corsair RM1000x 
CaseMouseAudio
Fractal Design Define R4 Logitech G402 Realtek ALC1150 + M-Audio AV40 
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
X5670 @ 4.4/3.2GHz core/uncore, 1.36 vcore, 1.2... Gigabyte X58A-UD5 r2.0 w/FF3mod10 BIOS Reference R9 290X w/Stilt's MLU 1000e / 1375m E... 2x Samsung MV-3V4G3D/US @ 2000, 10-11-11-30-T1,... 
RAMHard DriveHard DriveHard Drive
1x Crucial BLT4G3D1608ET3LX0 @ 2000, 10-11-11-3... OCZ (Toshiba) Trion 150 120GB Hyundai Sapphire 120GB 3x Hitachi Deskstar 7k1000.C 1TB 
CoolingOSPowerCase
Noctua NH-D14 Windows 7 Pro x64 SP1 Antec TP-750 Fractal Design R5 
Audio
ASUS Xonar DS 
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
i7-6800K @ 4.3/3.5GHz core/uncore, 1.36/1.2v ASRock X99 OC Formula (P3.10) GTX 780 (temporary) 4x4GiB Crucial DDR4-2400 @ 11-13-12-28-T2, 1.33v 
Hard DriveHard DriveCoolingOS
Intel 600p 256GB NVMe 2x HGST Travelstar 7k1000 1TB Corsair H55 (temporary) Windows Server 2016 Datacenter 
PowerCase
Seasonic SS-860XP2 Corsair Carbide Air 540 
  hide details  
Primary
(15 items)
 
Secondary
(13 items)
 
In progress
(10 items)
 
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
5820K @ 4.3/3.6GHz core/uncore, 1.225/1.2v Gigabyte X99 SOC Champion (F22n) 2x Sapphire R9 290X Tri-X OC New Edition (10036... 4x4GiB Crucial @ 2667, 12-11-12-27-T1, 1.37v 
Hard DriveHard DriveHard DriveCooling
Plextor M6e 128GB (fw 1.05) M.2 (PCI-E 2.0 2x) 2x Crucial M4 256GB 4x WD Scorpio Black 500GB Cooler Master Nepton 280L 
OSMonitorKeyboardPower
Windows 7 Professional x64 SP1 BenQ BL3200PT Filco Majestouch Tenkeyless (MX Brown) Corsair RM1000x 
CaseMouseAudio
Fractal Design Define R4 Logitech G402 Realtek ALC1150 + M-Audio AV40 
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
X5670 @ 4.4/3.2GHz core/uncore, 1.36 vcore, 1.2... Gigabyte X58A-UD5 r2.0 w/FF3mod10 BIOS Reference R9 290X w/Stilt's MLU 1000e / 1375m E... 2x Samsung MV-3V4G3D/US @ 2000, 10-11-11-30-T1,... 
RAMHard DriveHard DriveHard Drive
1x Crucial BLT4G3D1608ET3LX0 @ 2000, 10-11-11-3... OCZ (Toshiba) Trion 150 120GB Hyundai Sapphire 120GB 3x Hitachi Deskstar 7k1000.C 1TB 
CoolingOSPowerCase
Noctua NH-D14 Windows 7 Pro x64 SP1 Antec TP-750 Fractal Design R5 
Audio
ASUS Xonar DS 
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
i7-6800K @ 4.3/3.5GHz core/uncore, 1.36/1.2v ASRock X99 OC Formula (P3.10) GTX 780 (temporary) 4x4GiB Crucial DDR4-2400 @ 11-13-12-28-T2, 1.33v 
Hard DriveHard DriveCoolingOS
Intel 600p 256GB NVMe 2x HGST Travelstar 7k1000 1TB Corsair H55 (temporary) Windows Server 2016 Datacenter 
PowerCase
Seasonic SS-860XP2 Corsair Carbide Air 540 
  hide details  
post #118 of 448
Quote:
Originally Posted by Papas View Post
and again, we are looking at something that is not optimized at all yet. and this may not even be the final version...
This review is obviously written with the contents of the "Press kit" that was posted yesterday.
post #119 of 448
As expected.

But the cinebench results are a bit puzzling, maybe the modules ins't utilized properly or smth.
Dunno
(17 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
Intel i5 3550 Asrock P67 Extreme4 Gen3 MSI HD7850 1GB Kingston Hyperx Blu 2x2GB 
RAMHard DriveHard DriveCooling
Kingston Hyperx Blu 2x4GB Samsung Spinpoint F3 1tb Intel 330 60Gb SSD Scythe Mugen 2 
OSMonitorMonitorPower
Windows 8 Pro Acer AL2416W Samsung 940n Chieftec 750w 
Case
Thermaltake V4 
  hide details  
Dunno
(17 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
Intel i5 3550 Asrock P67 Extreme4 Gen3 MSI HD7850 1GB Kingston Hyperx Blu 2x2GB 
RAMHard DriveHard DriveCooling
Kingston Hyperx Blu 2x4GB Samsung Spinpoint F3 1tb Intel 330 60Gb SSD Scythe Mugen 2 
OSMonitorMonitorPower
Windows 8 Pro Acer AL2416W Samsung 940n Chieftec 750w 
Case
Thermaltake V4 
  hide details  
post #120 of 448
hmm...im thinking the next gen cpus might start getting interesting. as i see AMD working more on IPC and intel working on graphics performance, they might start looking like competetive brands as there performance curves start to intersect.
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: Rumors and Unconfirmed Articles
This thread is locked  
Overclock.net › Forums › Industry News › Rumors and Unconfirmed Articles › (PCM) Leaked dutch FX 8150 review!