One of the 6 languages I speak is Romanian and I have dissected this preview all day long. The people posting the preview are worried about something else which was not mentioned at all in this thread.
Cum explicam faptul ca producatorul AMD incurajeaza overclocking-ul, dar Bulldozer isi dubleaza consumul de energie si asa prea mare doar prin ridicarea frecventei si a tensiunii de alimentare in limite modeste ?
The above quote says : How do we explain the fact that AMD encourages overclocking but BD doubles its energy consumption which is already too big due to marginal clock and voltage increase?
They have a valid point as cheap BD motherboards will not be able to regulate this power draw
Another question, I would like to pose: if this is true and BD does perform like this, why the deception?
P.S: sorry for the bad translation, I've tried to keep it as close as possible to the original in order to avoid dramatic changes in meaning.
P.P.S: This preview did not have an ES sample, so why are people doubting it? The ES excuse is out the window. Furthermore, does a BIOS improve architecture?Edited by Wishmaker - 10/9/11 at 10:55am