Overclock.net › Forums › AMD › AMD - General › Is the new FX 8150 faster then a phenom 1100t?
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

Is the new FX 8150 faster then a phenom 1100t? - Page 2

post #11 of 51
In about 60% of synthetic benchmarks it's better. The other 40% it's either even with it, or performs slightly less. Both on par in games. <--Buzzkill. New chips are always fun to tinker with though.
Edited by Diabolical999 - 10/15/11 at 3:48pm
●๑۩۩๑●
(14 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
i5 2500K @ 4.4GHz (1.34v) Gigabyte P67A-UD4-B3 Gigabyte GTX 470 SOC @ 825MHz 4GB Corsair Vengeance DDR3 1600MHz (CL8) 
Hard DriveCoolingOSMonitor
Samsung Spinpoint F3 1TB Cooler Master Hyper N520 Windows 7 Ultimate x64 SP1 ASUS VH236H 23" 1080p | 2ms 
PowerCaseAudio
Corsair TX650w (V1) Xigmatek Utgard X-Fi Titanium Fatal1ty 
  hide details  
Reply
●๑۩۩๑●
(14 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
i5 2500K @ 4.4GHz (1.34v) Gigabyte P67A-UD4-B3 Gigabyte GTX 470 SOC @ 825MHz 4GB Corsair Vengeance DDR3 1600MHz (CL8) 
Hard DriveCoolingOSMonitor
Samsung Spinpoint F3 1TB Cooler Master Hyper N520 Windows 7 Ultimate x64 SP1 ASUS VH236H 23" 1080p | 2ms 
PowerCaseAudio
Corsair TX650w (V1) Xigmatek Utgard X-Fi Titanium Fatal1ty 
  hide details  
Reply
post #12 of 51
Whispers softly;

Get sandy bridge it rapes......
B
(13 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
Intel 2600K @ 1.24v @ 4.4Ghz Asus P8P67-EVO Nvidia GTX470 8GB G.Skill ECO DDR3-1600 
Hard DriveOptical DriveOSMonitor
ForceGT120GB + WD Greens HVD soon (2016) Windows 7 Home Premium Viewsonic 22" 1080p 2ms 
KeyboardPowerCaseMouse
Xarmor U9BL-S NZXT HALE90 80PG 650w Coolermaster HAF 912 Plus Razer Deathadder Respawn 
  hide details  
Reply
B
(13 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
Intel 2600K @ 1.24v @ 4.4Ghz Asus P8P67-EVO Nvidia GTX470 8GB G.Skill ECO DDR3-1600 
Hard DriveOptical DriveOSMonitor
ForceGT120GB + WD Greens HVD soon (2016) Windows 7 Home Premium Viewsonic 22" 1080p 2ms 
KeyboardPowerCaseMouse
Xarmor U9BL-S NZXT HALE90 80PG 650w Coolermaster HAF 912 Plus Razer Deathadder Respawn 
  hide details  
Reply
post #13 of 51
not worth it if you already got a core 2 duo
2016 Setup
(13 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
I7-3820 Asus P9 X79 Pro Manli GTX 980 4GB Samsung MV-3V4G3D 
Hard DriveCoolingOSMonitor
Samsung 850 EVO Kraken x61 Windows 7 Benq xl2430t 
KeyboardPowerCaseMouse
Corsair K60 Corsai TX750 NZXT Phantom Corsair M95 
Mouse Pad
Corsair MM400 
  hide details  
Reply
2016 Setup
(13 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
I7-3820 Asus P9 X79 Pro Manli GTX 980 4GB Samsung MV-3V4G3D 
Hard DriveCoolingOSMonitor
Samsung 850 EVO Kraken x61 Windows 7 Benq xl2430t 
KeyboardPowerCaseMouse
Corsair K60 Corsai TX750 NZXT Phantom Corsair M95 
Mouse Pad
Corsair MM400 
  hide details  
Reply
post #14 of 51
Quote:
Originally Posted by Aniket View Post
Its much more faster,
its been proved that the dismal performence of amd fx cpu was due to the buggy asus(crosshairV) & gigabyte mobos,
bulldozer performed nicely with asrock & msi boards so try to buy asrock/msi.
Hope this helps
proof please aniket.

No I dont think it is better at all.
post #15 of 51
It does not matter what slight performance difference there is as it already uses too many watts which makes it an uneconomical purchase.
B
(13 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
Intel 2600K @ 1.24v @ 4.4Ghz Asus P8P67-EVO Nvidia GTX470 8GB G.Skill ECO DDR3-1600 
Hard DriveOptical DriveOSMonitor
ForceGT120GB + WD Greens HVD soon (2016) Windows 7 Home Premium Viewsonic 22" 1080p 2ms 
KeyboardPowerCaseMouse
Xarmor U9BL-S NZXT HALE90 80PG 650w Coolermaster HAF 912 Plus Razer Deathadder Respawn 
  hide details  
Reply
B
(13 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
Intel 2600K @ 1.24v @ 4.4Ghz Asus P8P67-EVO Nvidia GTX470 8GB G.Skill ECO DDR3-1600 
Hard DriveOptical DriveOSMonitor
ForceGT120GB + WD Greens HVD soon (2016) Windows 7 Home Premium Viewsonic 22" 1080p 2ms 
KeyboardPowerCaseMouse
Xarmor U9BL-S NZXT HALE90 80PG 650w Coolermaster HAF 912 Plus Razer Deathadder Respawn 
  hide details  
Reply
post #16 of 51
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ace Telekinesis View Post
So the cinebench score improved more than 6.01? Bearing in mind a 1100T is 5.88.

Either way the 1100T has higher IPC anyhoo (core2duo has higher IPC lol)
The IPC isn't much higher, and BD clocks MUCH higher than thuban.
post #17 of 51
Quote:
Originally Posted by Aniket View Post
Its much more faster,
its been proved that the dismal performence of amd fx cpu was due to the buggy asus(crosshairV) & gigabyte mobos,
bulldozer performed nicely with asrock & msi boards so try to buy asrock/msi.
Hope this helps
Now I have seen everything on here. Someone actually suggesting MSI and Asrock over Asus and Gigabyte. That floats my boat, as I have loved my MSI and Asrock boards for awhile now. Like my MSI better, but I haven't had a problem with either. Wish I could say the same for the GB board that ended up in the landfill, or the Biostar board that I can't even pawn off on noobs
Assimilator
(16 items)
 
Backup
(12 items)
 
s939
(11 items)
 
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
Intel i7 4770k Gigabyte z97x-soc force XFX R7 260X Crucial Ballistix Sport LP  
Hard DriveHard DriveCoolingCooling
Crucial M500 Seagate  EK-KIT L120 Swiftech MCR-H220 
OSMonitorKeyboardPower
Arch Linux x86-64 HP E201 Cooler Master Rapid-i mx red/green led EVGA SuperNOVA 850B2 
CaseMouseMouse PadAudio
Corsair C70 Perixx MX-1800R Something from Radio Shack Altec Lansing 2.1 
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
i5 4690k Gigabyte Z97x-ud3h-bk MSI r7770 Crucial 
Hard DriveHard DriveCoolingOS
Crucial m4 240GB Seagate Corsair H60 Arch Linux 
MonitorKeyboardPowerCase
HP 2009m Noppoo Lolita 87 Corsair HX650 Cooler Master Haf 912 
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
AMD Opteron 185 DFI LANPARTY UT nF4 SLI-DR Expert EVGA 8800 GTS Corsair XMS-4000PT DDR500 
Hard DriveOptical DriveCoolingOS
Seagate Asus Thermalright XP-90  XP Pro 
PowerCaseAudio
Ultra XFinity Chrome ULT-XF500  Ultra Wizard ALC850 
  hide details  
Reply
Assimilator
(16 items)
 
Backup
(12 items)
 
s939
(11 items)
 
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
Intel i7 4770k Gigabyte z97x-soc force XFX R7 260X Crucial Ballistix Sport LP  
Hard DriveHard DriveCoolingCooling
Crucial M500 Seagate  EK-KIT L120 Swiftech MCR-H220 
OSMonitorKeyboardPower
Arch Linux x86-64 HP E201 Cooler Master Rapid-i mx red/green led EVGA SuperNOVA 850B2 
CaseMouseMouse PadAudio
Corsair C70 Perixx MX-1800R Something from Radio Shack Altec Lansing 2.1 
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
i5 4690k Gigabyte Z97x-ud3h-bk MSI r7770 Crucial 
Hard DriveHard DriveCoolingOS
Crucial m4 240GB Seagate Corsair H60 Arch Linux 
MonitorKeyboardPowerCase
HP 2009m Noppoo Lolita 87 Corsair HX650 Cooler Master Haf 912 
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
AMD Opteron 185 DFI LANPARTY UT nF4 SLI-DR Expert EVGA 8800 GTS Corsair XMS-4000PT DDR500 
Hard DriveOptical DriveCoolingOS
Seagate Asus Thermalright XP-90  XP Pro 
PowerCaseAudio
Ultra XFinity Chrome ULT-XF500  Ultra Wizard ALC850 
  hide details  
Reply
post #18 of 51
Gaming wise, nah its not really a worthwhile upgrade. 1100T is still respectable. If you need to uber multi task then grab one as it will edge it out if you absolutely must have maximum performance in that regard. If not wait for the next revision. Nothing wrong with having a CPU from the last gen.
ORL||H2O
(13 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
FX-8350 5.1Ghz Asus 990FX Sabertooth XFX 7950 Mushkin Enhanced 2x8G 11/11/11/30 - 2400Mhz 
Hard DriveOSKeyboardPower
SSD:2xM4 120Gb // 2x640Gb Black Win7 Ultimate 64b Corsair K90 Enermax Revo85+ 1020W 
CaseMouse
Corsair Air 540 RAT7 + G9x 
  hide details  
Reply
ORL||H2O
(13 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
FX-8350 5.1Ghz Asus 990FX Sabertooth XFX 7950 Mushkin Enhanced 2x8G 11/11/11/30 - 2400Mhz 
Hard DriveOSKeyboardPower
SSD:2xM4 120Gb // 2x640Gb Black Win7 Ultimate 64b Corsair K90 Enermax Revo85+ 1020W 
CaseMouse
Corsair Air 540 RAT7 + G9x 
  hide details  
Reply
post #19 of 51
Yes. Bulldozer might actually be better than the previous generation, based on a discovery a few hours ago that faulty Gigabyte / Asus boards might have been the problem. Add the upcoming CPU Registry Fix by Microsoft in there and it could outperform SB.
Edited by Xenthos - 10/15/11 at 7:10pm
post #20 of 51
Quote:
Originally Posted by s13shaka View Post
yes if youre doing heavily threaded applications
no....

If your going to upgrade get a 2600k.

Just to be safe though wait till all the rumors get settled.
i7 3820
(16 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsGraphics
i7 3820 AsRock X79 Extreme6 Sapphire 6950 2gb Sapphire 6950 2gb 
RAMHard DriveOptical DriveCooling
G.SKILL Ripjaws X Series 16GB (4 x 4GB)  Crucial M4 128gb LG HD-DVD/Blu-Ray Combo Drive Corsair H80 
OSMonitorKeyboardPower
Windows 7 Pro 64bit Samsung XL2370 Cooler Master Quick Fire (cherry blues) Corsair TX850M 
CaseMouseMouse PadAudio
Fractal Define R3 SS Xai SS 4HD Asus Xonar Essence ST 
  hide details  
Reply
i7 3820
(16 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsGraphics
i7 3820 AsRock X79 Extreme6 Sapphire 6950 2gb Sapphire 6950 2gb 
RAMHard DriveOptical DriveCooling
G.SKILL Ripjaws X Series 16GB (4 x 4GB)  Crucial M4 128gb LG HD-DVD/Blu-Ray Combo Drive Corsair H80 
OSMonitorKeyboardPower
Windows 7 Pro 64bit Samsung XL2370 Cooler Master Quick Fire (cherry blues) Corsair TX850M 
CaseMouseMouse PadAudio
Fractal Define R3 SS Xai SS 4HD Asus Xonar Essence ST 
  hide details  
Reply
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: AMD - General
Overclock.net › Forums › AMD › AMD - General › Is the new FX 8150 faster then a phenom 1100t?