Overclock.net › Forums › AMD › AMD CPUs › 1100T @ 3.9Ghz - 240x16.5 vs 200x19.5
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

1100T @ 3.9Ghz - 240x16.5 vs 200x19.5

post #1 of 6
Thread Starter 
Hi all, bit of a noob question.

1st time OC'er, been trying all weekend to get a stable 4Ghz from build below but have given up on that for now.

Seems to be stable at 3.9 for now and I was wondering what is better to run at 240x16.5 or 200x19.5 (or something else altogether) and why?
1st Build
(13 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
Phenom II X6 1100T @ 3.8Ghz Gigabyte GA-990FXA-D3 2x PowerColor 6870 G.Skill Ripjaws (2x4gb) 7-7-7-21 
Hard DriveOSMonitorPower
OCZ Agility 60GB & 2xWD Blue 1tb Win 7 Pro x64 2x BenQ G2420HD 24" Cooler Master GX-750W 
Case
BitFenix Shinobi 
  hide details  
Reply
1st Build
(13 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
Phenom II X6 1100T @ 3.8Ghz Gigabyte GA-990FXA-D3 2x PowerColor 6870 G.Skill Ripjaws (2x4gb) 7-7-7-21 
Hard DriveOSMonitorPower
OCZ Agility 60GB & 2xWD Blue 1tb Win 7 Pro x64 2x BenQ G2420HD 24" Cooler Master GX-750W 
Case
BitFenix Shinobi 
  hide details  
Reply
post #2 of 6
In my experience higher clock, lower multi works best.

edit-My 1090t is at 250x17, 18+ multi's were too iffy.
My System
(13 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
i5 2500k 4.7GHz 1.34v Asus P8Z77-V Pro Gigabyte Windforce 7950 8GB Crucial 1866 
Hard DriveOptical DriveOSMonitor
Crucial m4 128 GB Samsung BluRay Windows 7 64 Samsung S27A950D 
KeyboardPowerCaseMouse
Logitech G15 Seasonic 760-X Corsair 800D Logitech G9 
  hide details  
Reply
My System
(13 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
i5 2500k 4.7GHz 1.34v Asus P8Z77-V Pro Gigabyte Windforce 7950 8GB Crucial 1866 
Hard DriveOptical DriveOSMonitor
Crucial m4 128 GB Samsung BluRay Windows 7 64 Samsung S27A950D 
KeyboardPowerCaseMouse
Logitech G15 Seasonic 760-X Corsair 800D Logitech G9 
  hide details  
Reply
post #3 of 6
Same, high base clock, lower multis. My best results have been 15.5*265 = 4120mhz
I have a thread about my journey with my 1100, it's been kind of a pain in my backside to get here!
Downfall
(14 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
Phenom II 1100T BE @ 4.12 (265 x 15.5) @ 1.525v Asus Sabertooth 990FX 2x XFX 6870 Black Edition 8GB Corsair XMS3 9-9-9-24 1766mhz 
Hard DriveHard DriveCoolingOS
Corsair Force 3 Western Digital Black Edition Custom water cooling loop, started as Rasa RS360 Win7 x64 Enterprise 
MonitorPowerCaseMouse
Sony Bravia KDL-40S4100 (40" 1080P) Antec HCG-900 Cooler Master HAF 932 Logitech MX518 
  hide details  
Reply
Downfall
(14 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
Phenom II 1100T BE @ 4.12 (265 x 15.5) @ 1.525v Asus Sabertooth 990FX 2x XFX 6870 Black Edition 8GB Corsair XMS3 9-9-9-24 1766mhz 
Hard DriveHard DriveCoolingOS
Corsair Force 3 Western Digital Black Edition Custom water cooling loop, started as Rasa RS360 Win7 x64 Enterprise 
MonitorPowerCaseMouse
Sony Bravia KDL-40S4100 (40" 1080P) Antec HCG-900 Cooler Master HAF 932 Logitech MX518 
  hide details  
Reply
post #4 of 6
250*18, that's the most stable for me...

250*16 is great for 4GHZ though wink.gif
post #5 of 6
ALUCARDVPR -- you and your overclock... Quit bragging tongue.gif
Downfall
(14 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
Phenom II 1100T BE @ 4.12 (265 x 15.5) @ 1.525v Asus Sabertooth 990FX 2x XFX 6870 Black Edition 8GB Corsair XMS3 9-9-9-24 1766mhz 
Hard DriveHard DriveCoolingOS
Corsair Force 3 Western Digital Black Edition Custom water cooling loop, started as Rasa RS360 Win7 x64 Enterprise 
MonitorPowerCaseMouse
Sony Bravia KDL-40S4100 (40" 1080P) Antec HCG-900 Cooler Master HAF 932 Logitech MX518 
  hide details  
Reply
Downfall
(14 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
Phenom II 1100T BE @ 4.12 (265 x 15.5) @ 1.525v Asus Sabertooth 990FX 2x XFX 6870 Black Edition 8GB Corsair XMS3 9-9-9-24 1766mhz 
Hard DriveHard DriveCoolingOS
Corsair Force 3 Western Digital Black Edition Custom water cooling loop, started as Rasa RS360 Win7 x64 Enterprise 
MonitorPowerCaseMouse
Sony Bravia KDL-40S4100 (40" 1080P) Antec HCG-900 Cooler Master HAF 932 Logitech MX518 
  hide details  
Reply
post #6 of 6
Quote:
Originally Posted by Th3Gatekeep3r;15344597 
ALUCARDVPR -- you and your overclock... Quit bragging tongue.gif

wow. yeah that is really impressive. nice job. wink.gif that makes me miss all the work i put into getting my 1090t stable at 4.1ghz. that's a serious chip you got there.
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: AMD CPUs
Overclock.net › Forums › AMD › AMD CPUs › 1100T @ 3.9Ghz - 240x16.5 vs 200x19.5