Overclock.net › Forums › Industry News › Video Game News › [HBG] MW3 PC Requirements Surface – PC Version is Just a Console Port
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

[HBG] MW3 PC Requirements Surface – PC Version is Just a Console Port - Page 12

post #111 of 152
post #112 of 152
haha another win for COD.....NOT!
post #113 of 152
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by SafeKlok View Post
Haha I laughed. Well played.
Nexus
(13 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
Phenom II x4 955 Black Edition ASUS Crosshair V GTX 580 SLi 8GB G-Skill RipJaws X DDR3 1600Mhz 
Hard DriveOptical DriveOSMonitor
3 x 1TB WD Blue - 1 x OCZ Vertex II 60 SSD Samsung BluRay Drive Windows 7 64 Bit Home Premium ASUS VG236H 3D Monitor 
KeyboardPowerCaseMouse
Microsoft Sidewinder Thermaltake EVO Blue 650W HAF 932 Razer Imperator 
Mouse Pad
Razer Sphex 
  hide details  
Reply
Nexus
(13 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
Phenom II x4 955 Black Edition ASUS Crosshair V GTX 580 SLi 8GB G-Skill RipJaws X DDR3 1600Mhz 
Hard DriveOptical DriveOSMonitor
3 x 1TB WD Blue - 1 x OCZ Vertex II 60 SSD Samsung BluRay Drive Windows 7 64 Bit Home Premium ASUS VG236H 3D Monitor 
KeyboardPowerCaseMouse
Microsoft Sidewinder Thermaltake EVO Blue 650W HAF 932 Razer Imperator 
Mouse Pad
Razer Sphex 
  hide details  
Reply
post #114 of 152
Only disappointing thing is unranked dedicated servers, why even bother? AlterIWNet MW3 will be great, though.
post #115 of 152
As much as I tend to like BF3 better for MP (as compared to CoD), the ignorance flying on these kind of threads is disgusting and appalling.

The same people who spam and whine on BF threads about how CoD isn't being "innovative" by using the same engine from CoD4 are the same ones expecting massive changes in requirements. You know what? CoD is NOT a bad looking game, not one bit. I loved the lighting etc. Yeah, it may not hold a candle to some games, but heck for a 4-yr old engine, it looks darn good.

If with this SAME engine, the requirements were like that of BC2 or BF3 the same ignorant crowd will yell "poorly optimized!". Infinity ward did an excellent job with the CoD4 engine. Look at the performance that you get for the graphical quality! I quite honestly wonder sometimes whether people who make such silly arguments were born that stupid/ignorant or just developed it over time.

Please, please don't turn every thread into BF3 is awesome! CoD sucks. For crying out loud, it is a NEWS POST about the system requirements. Yes, discuss and comment on how it doesn't push the rigs of most of OCN members, and the fact that it is due to the engine, but don't turn it into ignorant babbling and bashing. People have preferences. Deal with it.
We kept crying for something that will "push our rigs" and guess what...Devs heard and produced Crysis 2 with horrendous tessellation use.

I, for one appreciate a good-looking yet well-optimized game than a drop-dead gorgeous game which I can't even play at decent framerate due to poor optimization. No thanks.

For the record, I do heartily wait to see a new engine for CoD matching the destruction(at least) in the BF series, however, all this CoD hate won't get us anywhere.


and I must add that calling every game with requires little to run well a console port is just ignorant. As is calling a game which requires ridiculous resources to run. Crysis would have been called a console port for sure if it had been released for consoles back then.
/rant.
Edited by dklimitless - 10/21/11 at 4:33pm
The Dark Knight
(13 items)
 
Rebirth
(13 items)
 
 
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
i5 2500K. 4.5Ghz (Summer Clocks) ASUS P8P67 Pro ( Rev 3.0 ) MSI 6970 Lightning (downclocked) CFX with MSI 6... 8GB G.Skill Sniper 1600Mhz 
Hard DriveOptical DriveOSMonitor
1 TB Spinpoint F3 +2TB F4(backups) Random LG drive Win7 SP1 64bit ASUS VH236H @1080p 
KeyboardPowerCase
Saitek Gaming keyboard ... >_> Corsair TX750 Rosewill Gear x3 
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
C2D P8600 @ 2.4Ghz (undervolted) Crappy dell Studio XPS one 4670M (1GB) I don't remember... 
Hard DriveOptical DriveOSMonitor
Crucial M4 4x Blu-ray ROM Win7 SP1 64bit 15.6" WLED @ 1080p 
KeyboardPower
Old Saitek Gaming Keyboard 90W adapter 
  hide details  
Reply
The Dark Knight
(13 items)
 
Rebirth
(13 items)
 
 
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
i5 2500K. 4.5Ghz (Summer Clocks) ASUS P8P67 Pro ( Rev 3.0 ) MSI 6970 Lightning (downclocked) CFX with MSI 6... 8GB G.Skill Sniper 1600Mhz 
Hard DriveOptical DriveOSMonitor
1 TB Spinpoint F3 +2TB F4(backups) Random LG drive Win7 SP1 64bit ASUS VH236H @1080p 
KeyboardPowerCase
Saitek Gaming keyboard ... >_> Corsair TX750 Rosewill Gear x3 
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
C2D P8600 @ 2.4Ghz (undervolted) Crappy dell Studio XPS one 4670M (1GB) I don't remember... 
Hard DriveOptical DriveOSMonitor
Crucial M4 4x Blu-ray ROM Win7 SP1 64bit 15.6" WLED @ 1080p 
KeyboardPower
Old Saitek Gaming Keyboard 90W adapter 
  hide details  
Reply
post #116 of 152
Quote:
Originally Posted by dklimitless View Post
As much as I tend to like BF3 better for MP (as compared to CoD), the ignorance flying on these kind of threads is disgusting and appalling.

The same people who spam and whine on BF threads about how CoD isn't being "innovative" by using the same engine from CoD4 are the same ones expecting massive changes in requirements. You know what? CoD is NOT a bad looking game, not one bit. I loved the lighting etc. Yeah, it may not hold a candle to some games, but heck for a 4-yr old engine, it looks darn good.

If with this SAME engine, the requirements were like that of BC2 or BF3 the same ignorant crowd will yell "poorly optimized!". Infinity ward did an excellent job with the CoD4 engine. Look at the performance that you get for the graphical quality! I quite honestly wonder sometimes whether people who make such silly arguments were born that stupid/ignorant or just developed it over time.

Please, please don't turn every thread into BF3 is awesome! CoD sucks. For crying out loud, it is a NEWS POST about the system requirements. Yes, discuss and comment on how it doesn't push the rigs of most of OCN members, and the fact that it is due to the engine, but don't turn it into ignorant babbling and bashing. People have preferences. Deal with it.
We kept crying for something that will "push our rigs" and guess what...Devs heard and produced Crysis 2 with horrendous tessellation use.

I, for one appreciate a good-looking yet well-optimized game than a drop-dead gorgeous game which I can't even play at decent framerate due to poor optimization. No thanks.

For the record, I do heartily wait to see a new engine for CoD matching the destruction(at least) in the BF series, however, all this CoD hate won't get us anywhere.


and I must add that calling every game with requires little to run well a console port is just ignorant. As is calling a game which requires ridiculous resources to run. Crysis would have been called a console port for sure if it had been released for consoles back then.
/rant.
Don't worry they are idiots lol just look at the source engine thread which stated they only update it instead of making a new one. Guess what? People are like ok cool but then come in COD threads and cry same engine.... hypocrites. There excuse for the source engine is "they update it" update what? It almost looks exactly how it was before. They add a little better lighting and some particles and these people think it's amazing.

Now I love all source games and I still play BF and COD games. I'm just not closed minded.
post #117 of 152
Consoles is where they make their money. $15 map packs
post #118 of 152
Quote:
Originally Posted by Drjft View Post
Le sigh.
le sigh
post #119 of 152
Quote:
Originally Posted by hzac View Post
Dont even know why i bother reading these threads anymore. its just blah blah zomg bf3 this, screw mw3 copy paste LOLOL COD4. Its hilariously ironic in the way you guys are just spweing out the same old garbage sentences over and over again.
This!
post #120 of 152

The reason no body on PC cares about MW3 news:


Battlefield 3 Launch Trailer
Blood Dragon
(13 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
Intel i5-4670K MSI Z87-G45 Gaming LGA 1150 MSI GTX 980 Ti Gaming 6G  G.SKILL Sniper Series 16GB DDR3 2133 
CoolingOSMonitorKeyboard
Hyper 212 EVO Win 7 64 QNIX 2710 Evolution II Logitech G110 
PowerCaseMouseMouse Pad
CORSAIR HX Series HX850 850W Rosewill THOR V2 Gaming Logitech G502 Proteus Core Cyber Snipa TRACER 
Audio
Logitech G35 Headset 
  hide details  
Reply
Blood Dragon
(13 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
Intel i5-4670K MSI Z87-G45 Gaming LGA 1150 MSI GTX 980 Ti Gaming 6G  G.SKILL Sniper Series 16GB DDR3 2133 
CoolingOSMonitorKeyboard
Hyper 212 EVO Win 7 64 QNIX 2710 Evolution II Logitech G110 
PowerCaseMouseMouse Pad
CORSAIR HX Series HX850 850W Rosewill THOR V2 Gaming Logitech G502 Proteus Core Cyber Snipa TRACER 
Audio
Logitech G35 Headset 
  hide details  
Reply
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: Video Game News
Overclock.net › Forums › Industry News › Video Game News › [HBG] MW3 PC Requirements Surface – PC Version is Just a Console Port