Overclock.net › Forums › AMD › AMD CPUs › FX 8150 at FAH - pitiful performance
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

FX 8150 at FAH - pitiful performance - Page 8  

post #71 of 79
Quote:
Originally Posted by IrishV8 View Post
End this plz bulldozer not really the best built chip it happens we live with it or move on. So should every one who is complain over it. I mean realy its like trying to argue Darwin's theory of evolution to a group of hard core Christians they are never going to buy it. Just because it has more cores doesn't mean it is better "but the number is bigger so it better right" no i have seen small block Chevy's beat 502 monsters. give it time and it might get better, let them work on it a bit more and it might be able to compete as of now........... Do I really have to say it or is the picture clear enough for you. Yes i do use AMD cause it is cheap remember you get what you pay for. "But i payed $250 for it." Yeah true but its still cheap. yes I know I am going to get flamed.
I don't think anyone made a statement to that effect did they ?
post #72 of 79
This StepanPepan guy has almost every post about Bulldozer. Either a butt hurt AMD fanboy or an intel troll.
post #73 of 79
Quote:
Originally Posted by SCollins View Post
I don't think anyone made a statement to that effect did they ?
Just tired of the multiple threads on bulldozer performance and the crying, defending, attacking, it gets old fast and we as adults should know to move on.

Not trying to be evil just try to help people push past it.
Jynx
(16 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsGraphics
Intel Core i5 2500K Z68A-GD65 (G3) (MS-7681) Intel HD Graphics 2000 (GT2) NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti 
RAMRAMHard DriveOptical Drive
Crucial Technology  Crucial Technology  WD black Lg 3d Blueray 
CoolingOSMonitorPower
Phanteks PH-TC14PE Win 7 64bit 27" Samsung sa750 Thermaltake 750 
CaseMouse
nzxt phantom R.A.T. 7 
  hide details  
Jynx
(16 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsGraphics
Intel Core i5 2500K Z68A-GD65 (G3) (MS-7681) Intel HD Graphics 2000 (GT2) NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti 
RAMRAMHard DriveOptical Drive
Crucial Technology  Crucial Technology  WD black Lg 3d Blueray 
CoolingOSMonitorPower
Phanteks PH-TC14PE Win 7 64bit 27" Samsung sa750 Thermaltake 750 
CaseMouse
nzxt phantom R.A.T. 7 
  hide details  
post #74 of 79
Quote:
Originally Posted by IrishV8 View Post
Just tired of the multiple threads on bulldozer performance and the crying, defending, attacking, it gets old fast and we as adults should know to move on.

Not trying to be evil just try to help people push past it.
The problem IMHO is the lack of adult conversation and respectful discourse on the subject manner. I agree much spamming.
post #75 of 79
SCollins

I like you already.
Jynx
(16 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsGraphics
Intel Core i5 2500K Z68A-GD65 (G3) (MS-7681) Intel HD Graphics 2000 (GT2) NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti 
RAMRAMHard DriveOptical Drive
Crucial Technology  Crucial Technology  WD black Lg 3d Blueray 
CoolingOSMonitorPower
Phanteks PH-TC14PE Win 7 64bit 27" Samsung sa750 Thermaltake 750 
CaseMouse
nzxt phantom R.A.T. 7 
  hide details  
Jynx
(16 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsGraphics
Intel Core i5 2500K Z68A-GD65 (G3) (MS-7681) Intel HD Graphics 2000 (GT2) NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti 
RAMRAMHard DriveOptical Drive
Crucial Technology  Crucial Technology  WD black Lg 3d Blueray 
CoolingOSMonitorPower
Phanteks PH-TC14PE Win 7 64bit 27" Samsung sa750 Thermaltake 750 
CaseMouse
nzxt phantom R.A.T. 7 
  hide details  
post #76 of 79
Quote:
Originally Posted by NateN34 View Post
*leaves thread before AMD fanboys start blaming it on motherboard drivers, Windows 8 and ASUS motherboards.*

EDIT: Wow, just read that article and wow....fail. I think people need to stop reviewing this CPU and throw it in the trash, where it belongs.
Blame AMD. They should not be releasing a CPU chip like this. They had great success from 1055, 1090 and 1100T, why did they allow this to happen.
post #77 of 79
Quote:
Originally Posted by SCollins View Post
You do know that Intel never fixed the code dispatch mechanism in the compiler right ?? So if they aren't actively optimizing the binarys for BD and other AMD cpu's its going to use less powerful instructions on non intel hardware.




http://folding.stanford.edu/English/FAQ-QMD#ntoc15
Quote:
Originally Posted by _s3v3n_ View Post
Blame AMD. They should not be releasing a CPU chip like this. They had great success from 1055, 1090 and 1100T, why did they allow this to happen.

Blame is on Standford university for writing the program in fortran instead of C/C++ which has CPU agnostic capable compilers.
post #78 of 79
Quote:
Originally Posted by StepanPepan View Post
In intel forums is just boredom. People are happy with their CPUs, just a little speculations about upcoming processors there, 2700K brings nothing new, SB-E is very predictable, only thrill is, how high will IB overclock and if and how will performance per core rise in comparison with SB. That is about it.

AMD forums offer much more thrill and entertainment.
post #79 of 79
Enough already.

If you guys could have kept on topic, this discussion honestly belonged in the F@H section. But....seeing as how, yet ANOTHER Bulldozer thread got trashed, its now locked.
Junkyard
(18 items)
 
NAStradamous
(12 items)
 
HTPC01
(16 items)
 
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
Intel i5 2320 @ 3.1GHz MSI B75MA-E33 HIS HD7970 3GB @ 1050 / 1700, 1.17v Patriot 2x4GB DDR3-1066 
Hard DriveHard DriveOptical DriveCooling
Crucial MX100 256GB WD Green 2TB DVDRW Corsair H50 Push / Pull 
CoolingOSMonitorMonitor
NZXT 120mm fans strapped to stock 7970 cooler Windows 10 Pro Dell 3007WFP Dell 2007FP 
MonitorKeyboardPowerCase
Dell 2007FP Cheap Toshiba (R.I.P. Ducky) PC Power & Cooling Silencer MKIII 950w Cheap Garbage (free) 
MouseAudio
Logitech G602 Yardsale Special 
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
Intel Core i5 3330 Asus H61 MSI GTX 750Ti Low Profile 2x4GB Hynix DDR3-1333 
Hard DriveHard DriveOptical DriveCooling
60GB Kingston SSD 1TB Seagate Samsung DVDRW CoolerMaster Gemin II 
OSMonitorKeyboardPower
Windows 8.1 + Steam Big Picture / Plex HT 50" Insignia LED 1080p Logitech Rosewill Green 530w 
CaseMouseAudioOther
Silverstone HTPC Logitech Pioneer 2.0 tower speakers + 135w RMS Rosewill MCE Remote 
  hide details  
Junkyard
(18 items)
 
NAStradamous
(12 items)
 
HTPC01
(16 items)
 
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
Intel i5 2320 @ 3.1GHz MSI B75MA-E33 HIS HD7970 3GB @ 1050 / 1700, 1.17v Patriot 2x4GB DDR3-1066 
Hard DriveHard DriveOptical DriveCooling
Crucial MX100 256GB WD Green 2TB DVDRW Corsair H50 Push / Pull 
CoolingOSMonitorMonitor
NZXT 120mm fans strapped to stock 7970 cooler Windows 10 Pro Dell 3007WFP Dell 2007FP 
MonitorKeyboardPowerCase
Dell 2007FP Cheap Toshiba (R.I.P. Ducky) PC Power & Cooling Silencer MKIII 950w Cheap Garbage (free) 
MouseAudio
Logitech G602 Yardsale Special 
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
Intel Core i5 3330 Asus H61 MSI GTX 750Ti Low Profile 2x4GB Hynix DDR3-1333 
Hard DriveHard DriveOptical DriveCooling
60GB Kingston SSD 1TB Seagate Samsung DVDRW CoolerMaster Gemin II 
OSMonitorKeyboardPower
Windows 8.1 + Steam Big Picture / Plex HT 50" Insignia LED 1080p Logitech Rosewill Green 530w 
CaseMouseAudioOther
Silverstone HTPC Logitech Pioneer 2.0 tower speakers + 135w RMS Rosewill MCE Remote 
  hide details  
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: AMD CPUs
This thread is locked  
Overclock.net › Forums › AMD › AMD CPUs › FX 8150 at FAH - pitiful performance