Originally Posted by royalkilla408
No wonder BC2 had better destruction than BF3. What a shame. So many missing features from the game it makes it feel like MW games. Dice and EA are idiots.
What is with you people, you either will play the game, or won't. BC2 WAS A CONSOLE PORT, BF3 IS NOT(completely) A CONSOLE PORT.
Please name the features its missing, how could it be missing if it was never in the game in the first place?
Just because a screen says to turn off aim assist to make it a "challenge" doesn't mean the whole game was a port. It would defiantly explain why the loading screen doesn't fill up the whole window.
And for the people ragging on Battlelog, i actually like it, this is my opinon, but you have stat tracking, friends, friends acheivments, groups, servers, etc all in one place, epic.
I think the game is good, they need to do some changes though. Patches for sure, the game crashes a decent amount, not nearly as much as BlOps did when it came out, so im happy with that. It can only get better with time, unless they "fix" weapons, most notable the tracer dart from BC2.
Someone said that the maps feel like they were made for console. This i agree with, if you compare it to BF2. BC2 was a console port, so you can't compare it to that, even if you take away the fact that BC2 was a console port, it was a completely different type of game, BC STARTED ON CONSOLES, you'd be clueless if you said otherwise.
one last thing, 64 people is too much on any of the maps in the game, 32 is perfectly fine.