Originally Posted by Kazumi
I don't see why some folks will say Screw performance for a little more "bling" Med to high is hardly a big change. However the performance increase is noticable. Why would you be happy with 40-60 FPS? That's terrible. A 20 FPS gap? I'd toss my PC out a window for giving me that type of performance.
I'd rather lose a little of the "pretty picture" effect, and stay stable over at or OVER 60 FPS. Below that, games just feel choppy, slugish, and poor.
You are right about the med to high difference but you are wrong about throwing the computer out the window. I am running 3 monitor and if I lower to low setting then the fps is the same. When running one monitor on all high setting I get 180fps easy. There is not much change if at all when changing low, med high setting. I plan on upgrading video cards in the future to 2 x 6990/7990 but right now I dont have the money for that.
And for your information a human eye cannot see much more than 60-65 fps so running at 40-60fps is not bad at all. It doesn't jump or lag at all. It runs smooth and thats the main thing. Wether you run at 30fps or 60fps, if it runs smooth you'll hardly notice a difference.
MW3 is made to run at 60fps and BF3 is made to run at 30fps. Can anyone really notice a difference between the gameplay. No, not really, 30fps or 60fps is not anything to get hyped up about if the fps runs smooth and doesn't jump around that much.