Overclock.net › Forums › Industry News › Hardware News › [CCL] CM Hyper 212 : Plus vs. Evo
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

[CCL] CM Hyper 212 : Plus vs. Evo

post #1 of 21
Thread Starter 
This comes from a french website, cowcotland.com.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Google Translate 
Today, a little comparative very special, since the two heaters here are identical: Cooler Master Hyper 212 Plus, and Evo. The 212 Plus was a benchmark in its time, and is still relevant today. Its replacement, the Evo, has the difficult task of making us forget his elder. Mission accomplished?

450

576

>>> Summary (Click to show)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Google Translate 
While some will be disappointed by the performance slightly compared to the Plus, it should be noted that the newcomer is much quieter. But above all, and very importantly, if we properly manage PWM setting in the BIOS, it retains a powerful and quiet cooler, noise-free due to voltage drop. For example, you can easily block the fan to 50% below 65 ° C, to avoid almost never turn it fully.
And that's just the little more, as I say, the little Evo makes all the difference.

Translated source

Original source (french)
Ti-89 Titanium
(13 items)
 
   
CPUMotherboardRAMHard Drive
Motorola 68k @16 MHz Ti-89 HW4 256 KB 2.6 MB Flash ROM 
OSMonitorPowerCase
Ti-89 OS 3.10 LCD Dot-Matrix 160x100 4x 1.5V AAA Ti-89 HW4 Black 
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
Intel Core™ i7 930 Gigabyte GA-X58A-UD3R 2.0 Gigabyte GTX 470 SOC G.Skill RX 2x4GB 1600C8 
Hard DriveHard DriveOptical DriveCooling
PNY Prevail Elite 120GB Hitachi 7K1000.C 1TB LG GH24LS50 Noctua NH-C12P SE14 
OSOSMonitorKeyboard
Windows 8 Pro x64 Lubuntu 13.10 x64 Samsung BX2250 Logitech Illuminated 
PowerCaseMouseAudio
Be Quiet! S.P. E⁷ 600W Fractal Design Core 3000 Logitech G300 AKG K240 Studio 
  hide details  
Reply
Ti-89 Titanium
(13 items)
 
   
CPUMotherboardRAMHard Drive
Motorola 68k @16 MHz Ti-89 HW4 256 KB 2.6 MB Flash ROM 
OSMonitorPowerCase
Ti-89 OS 3.10 LCD Dot-Matrix 160x100 4x 1.5V AAA Ti-89 HW4 Black 
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
Intel Core™ i7 930 Gigabyte GA-X58A-UD3R 2.0 Gigabyte GTX 470 SOC G.Skill RX 2x4GB 1600C8 
Hard DriveHard DriveOptical DriveCooling
PNY Prevail Elite 120GB Hitachi 7K1000.C 1TB LG GH24LS50 Noctua NH-C12P SE14 
OSOSMonitorKeyboard
Windows 8 Pro x64 Lubuntu 13.10 x64 Samsung BX2250 Logitech Illuminated 
PowerCaseMouseAudio
Be Quiet! S.P. E⁷ 600W Fractal Design Core 3000 Logitech G300 AKG K240 Studio 
  hide details  
Reply
post #2 of 21
I think they messed up the install on the Evo. The temps should be identical.
S340 Elite
(13 items)
 
Clevo P650RP6-G
(6 items)
 
 
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
Intel i7 8700k Asus Maximus X Hero Asus ROG 1080 Ti Strix Team Dark Pro 16GB DDR4 3600MHz 
Hard DriveHard DriveCoolingOS
Samsung 850 Evo 1TB Seagate Barracuda 4TB Noctua NH-D15S Windows 10 
MonitorKeyboardPowerCase
Sony KDL-40HX853 Coolermaster Quickfire Rapid TKL  Superflower LEADEX II 850W NZXT S340 Elite 
Mouse
Logitech G403 Wireless 
CPUGraphicsRAMHard Drive
Intel i7 6700HQ nVidia GTX1060 6GB Kingston HyperX Impact 2133MHZ 16GB INTEL 600p 128GB 
Hard DriveOS
Samsung 850 EVO 1TB Windows 10 Pro 64 
  hide details  
Reply
S340 Elite
(13 items)
 
Clevo P650RP6-G
(6 items)
 
 
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
Intel i7 8700k Asus Maximus X Hero Asus ROG 1080 Ti Strix Team Dark Pro 16GB DDR4 3600MHz 
Hard DriveHard DriveCoolingOS
Samsung 850 Evo 1TB Seagate Barracuda 4TB Noctua NH-D15S Windows 10 
MonitorKeyboardPowerCase
Sony KDL-40HX853 Coolermaster Quickfire Rapid TKL  Superflower LEADEX II 850W NZXT S340 Elite 
Mouse
Logitech G403 Wireless 
CPUGraphicsRAMHard Drive
Intel i7 6700HQ nVidia GTX1060 6GB Kingston HyperX Impact 2133MHZ 16GB INTEL 600p 128GB 
Hard DriveOS
Samsung 850 EVO 1TB Windows 10 Pro 64 
  hide details  
Reply
post #3 of 21
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cyph3r View Post

I think they messed up the install on the Evo. The temps should be identical.

Shouldn't the EVO be slightly better? They improved it a bit and it's a tad more expensive... Temps should be similar still.
It. Gets. Better.
(16 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
2500k@4.6Ghz ASUS P8Z68/Gen3 Radeon HD 5870 16 GB G.skill 1600mhz 
Hard DriveHard DriveHard DriveCooling
750GB Hitachi Crucial M4 128GB Seagate Barracuda 2 TB Corsair H100 
OSPowerCase
Windows 7 Corsair TX 650 HAF X 
  hide details  
Reply
It. Gets. Better.
(16 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
2500k@4.6Ghz ASUS P8Z68/Gen3 Radeon HD 5870 16 GB G.skill 1600mhz 
Hard DriveHard DriveHard DriveCooling
750GB Hitachi Crucial M4 128GB Seagate Barracuda 2 TB Corsair H100 
OSPowerCase
Windows 7 Corsair TX 650 HAF X 
  hide details  
Reply
post #4 of 21
Something's messed up in these benchmarks.
post #5 of 21
I have the evo and it performs very well, 35c idle at with a 31c system temp 65c max loaded. 4.6 at 1.4 OC
Special fried H2O
(21 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsGraphics
Intel Core i7 3770k P8Z77-V PRO evga geforce 980ti sc evga geforce 980ti sc 
RAMHard DriveHard DriveHard Drive
G.Skills sniper Crucial m4 Samsung spinpoint f3 Western Digital wd10eals-00z8a0 
Hard DriveHard DriveHard DriveOptical Drive
seagate  Samsung spinpoint f3 Samsung spinpoint f3 Some bd rom atm 
CoolingOSMonitorKeyboard
xspc Raystorm Win 10 64 40' Crossover Ducky Shine White 
PowerCaseMouseMouse Pad
Crucial 850w NZxt Switch Razer Deathadder x Trax Ripper 
Audio
Klipsich 
  hide details  
Reply
Special fried H2O
(21 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsGraphics
Intel Core i7 3770k P8Z77-V PRO evga geforce 980ti sc evga geforce 980ti sc 
RAMHard DriveHard DriveHard Drive
G.Skills sniper Crucial m4 Samsung spinpoint f3 Western Digital wd10eals-00z8a0 
Hard DriveHard DriveHard DriveOptical Drive
seagate  Samsung spinpoint f3 Samsung spinpoint f3 Some bd rom atm 
CoolingOSMonitorKeyboard
xspc Raystorm Win 10 64 40' Crossover Ducky Shine White 
PowerCaseMouseMouse Pad
Crucial 850w NZxt Switch Razer Deathadder x Trax Ripper 
Audio
Klipsich 
  hide details  
Reply
post #6 of 21
They messed up somehow. EVO should match or slightly wins Plus.
Misaka
(18 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
Intel Core i5-3570K ASRock Z68 Extreme4 Gen3 Sapphire HD 7850 2 GB Samsung DDR3 16 GB (30 nm) 
Hard DriveHard DriveOptical DriveCooling
Crucial M4 128 GB WD Caviar Blue 1 TB Lite-on DVD Burner Thermalright Venomous X 
OSOSMonitorKeyboard
Windows 7 Professional x64 (Host) Crunchbang Linux x64 (Guest) HP 2311x HP PS/2 Keyboard 
PowerCaseMouseAudio
Rosewill Capstone 450 W Rosewill Challenger Logitech M570 ASUS Xonar D1 
Other
Hauppauge HVR-1250 
  hide details  
Reply
Misaka
(18 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
Intel Core i5-3570K ASRock Z68 Extreme4 Gen3 Sapphire HD 7850 2 GB Samsung DDR3 16 GB (30 nm) 
Hard DriveHard DriveOptical DriveCooling
Crucial M4 128 GB WD Caviar Blue 1 TB Lite-on DVD Burner Thermalright Venomous X 
OSOSMonitorKeyboard
Windows 7 Professional x64 (Host) Crunchbang Linux x64 (Guest) HP 2311x HP PS/2 Keyboard 
PowerCaseMouseAudio
Rosewill Capstone 450 W Rosewill Challenger Logitech M570 ASUS Xonar D1 
Other
Hauppauge HVR-1250 
  hide details  
Reply
post #7 of 21
They should run the same. I've used both of them in practically two identical builds (only swapped RAM but still used an x2 555BE and the same Asrock mobo) and they run virtually the same. Those benches don't sit well with me.
   
i865G Chronos
(15 items)
 
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
Core 2 Extreme X6800 AsRock 775i65G R2.0 ATI Radeon X1950 XT OCZ EL DDR Gold Edition GX 
Hard DriveOptical DriveCoolingOS
Samsung MMBRE64GHDXP-MVBD1 Samsung SH-222 Thermalright Ultima-90 Windows 98 SE 
OSMonitorKeyboardPower
Windows XP Professional 32 bit Dell SP2309W Genius SlimStar 8000 Generic 500w PSU 
CaseMouseAudio
Generic Case Genius SlimStar 8000 Creative Sound Blaster Audigy 2 ZS 
  hide details  
Reply
   
i865G Chronos
(15 items)
 
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
Core 2 Extreme X6800 AsRock 775i65G R2.0 ATI Radeon X1950 XT OCZ EL DDR Gold Edition GX 
Hard DriveOptical DriveCoolingOS
Samsung MMBRE64GHDXP-MVBD1 Samsung SH-222 Thermalright Ultima-90 Windows 98 SE 
OSMonitorKeyboardPower
Windows XP Professional 32 bit Dell SP2309W Genius SlimStar 8000 Generic 500w PSU 
CaseMouseAudio
Generic Case Genius SlimStar 8000 Creative Sound Blaster Audigy 2 ZS 
  hide details  
Reply
post #8 of 21
I agree from what ive been seeing and have herd the evo does the same just quieter due to the 1600rpm fan vs 2000rpm fan
post #9 of 21
I think these results are pretty accurate. The heatsink design (and mounting) between the 212 plus and evo isn't all that different, and the Evo has an inferior fan.

The Blademaster on the Hyper 212 Plus had a max RPM of 2000RPM and static pressure of 3.9mmh20. This new fan on the Evo is only 1600RPM, with a static pressure of 1.7mmh20. The actual heatsink design of the Evo would have to be significantly better (which it isn't) than the Hyper 212 Plus for it to match the performance on a much weaker fan.
Rig
(9 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
5820k ga-x99-sli gigabyte 7970 wf 16gb 4x4 lpx 
Hard DriveCoolingPowerCase
samsung 830 128gb ven x/gt ap-15 evga g2 650w corsair 450d 
Audio
jbl lsr305 
  hide details  
Reply
Rig
(9 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
5820k ga-x99-sli gigabyte 7970 wf 16gb 4x4 lpx 
Hard DriveCoolingPowerCase
samsung 830 128gb ven x/gt ap-15 evga g2 650w corsair 450d 
Audio
jbl lsr305 
  hide details  
Reply
post #10 of 21
Quote:
Originally Posted by GameBoy View Post

I think these results are pretty accurate. The heatsink design (and mounting) between the 212 plus and evo isn't all that different, and the Evo has an inferior fan.
The Blademaster on the Hyper 212 Plus had a max RPM of 2000RPM and static pressure of 3.9mmh20. This new fan on the Evo is only 1600RPM, with a static pressure of 1.7mmh20. The actual heatsink design of the Evo would have to be significantly better (which it isn't) than the Hyper 212 Plus for it to match the performance on a much weaker fan.

In reality, air moves quite easily through 212 EVO. Even at 900 RPM, it can keep my i3 2100 at 40C when folding.
Misaka
(18 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
Intel Core i5-3570K ASRock Z68 Extreme4 Gen3 Sapphire HD 7850 2 GB Samsung DDR3 16 GB (30 nm) 
Hard DriveHard DriveOptical DriveCooling
Crucial M4 128 GB WD Caviar Blue 1 TB Lite-on DVD Burner Thermalright Venomous X 
OSOSMonitorKeyboard
Windows 7 Professional x64 (Host) Crunchbang Linux x64 (Guest) HP 2311x HP PS/2 Keyboard 
PowerCaseMouseAudio
Rosewill Capstone 450 W Rosewill Challenger Logitech M570 ASUS Xonar D1 
Other
Hauppauge HVR-1250 
  hide details  
Reply
Misaka
(18 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
Intel Core i5-3570K ASRock Z68 Extreme4 Gen3 Sapphire HD 7850 2 GB Samsung DDR3 16 GB (30 nm) 
Hard DriveHard DriveOptical DriveCooling
Crucial M4 128 GB WD Caviar Blue 1 TB Lite-on DVD Burner Thermalright Venomous X 
OSOSMonitorKeyboard
Windows 7 Professional x64 (Host) Crunchbang Linux x64 (Guest) HP 2311x HP PS/2 Keyboard 
PowerCaseMouseAudio
Rosewill Capstone 450 W Rosewill Challenger Logitech M570 ASUS Xonar D1 
Other
Hauppauge HVR-1250 
  hide details  
Reply
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: Hardware News
Overclock.net › Forums › Industry News › Hardware News › [CCL] CM Hyper 212 : Plus vs. Evo