U need 1,016m for a 360° turn ????Originally Posted by Ramla777
Around 40inches per 360 cs/css/quakelive. http://www.zowiegear.dk/ is where it was ordered from.
Interests me just how much variance there is in what speeds people can reach. Some can hit high speeds at medium sensitivities. Edit: As in, 10in/360ish, not yours.Originally Posted by Ramla777
Around 40inches per 360 cs/css/quakelive. http://www.zowiegear.dk/ is where it was ordered from.
Thanks for your review,Originally Posted by Ramla777
Around 40inches per 360 cs/css/quakelive. http://www.zowiegear.dk/ is where it was ordered from.
In the review he said he could/would switch to the AM if it's tracking speed was a bit higher, so I'm guessing anywhere from 3.5-4 m/s. Guessing is pretty much all you can do, as I doubt there's something you could leave running while you game that would keep track of that.
he may hit them with 40"/360 but i dont know if he meant centimeters cause 40 inches is the slowest i heard of.Originally Posted by scandalous
The perfect control speeds don't seem that bad to me at all. Well except the 1150 one. But In perspective this thing's perfect control speed is twice as high as the popular intelli 1.1 and 3.0 from microsoft.
According to this http://www.esreality.com/?a=longpost&id=1265679&page=14 It's perfect control speed is even higher than the mx518, which I personally could never make skip even once nor hit negative accel on.
When actually gaming (normally) do you hit those speeds you mentioned?
sujoy [ESR] tested the mx518 at 1600dpi, its sensor is 400-800cpi native, if he tested at lower dpi then the max perfect control speed would be much higherOriginally Posted by scandalous
The perfect control speeds don't seem that bad to me at all. Well except the 1150 one. But In perspective this thing's perfect control speed is twice as high as the popular intelli 1.1 and 3.0 from microsoft.
According to this http://www.esreality.com/?a=longpost&id=1265679&page=14 It's perfect control speed is even higher than the mx518, which I personally could never make skip even once nor hit negative accel on.
When actually gaming (normally) do you hit those speeds you mentioned?
518 (A3080) should be 400-1600 native w/ counts halved from 1600 to produce a 800 CPI step.
There's no point comparing these with Sujoy's results. Most likely Ramla tested with a software program like Enotus, which is highly inaccurate.Originally Posted by scandalous
The perfect control speeds don't seem that bad to me at all. Well except the 1150 one. But In perspective this thing's perfect control speed is twice as high as the popular intelli 1.1 and 3.0 from microsoft.
According to this http://www.esreality.com/?a=longpost&id=1265679&page=14 It's perfect control speed is even higher than the mx518, which I personally could never make skip even once nor hit negative accel on.
I was just about to post this. Using enotus on my 1600DPI MX518 the 800 and 1600 steps match Sujoy's findings but at 400 DPI it can track at twice that speed.
That means Sujoy's testing is kinda flawed as his test only represent max resolutions.Originally Posted by Derp
I was just about to post this. Using enotus on my 1600DPI MX518 the 800 and 1600 steps match Sujoy's findings but at 400 DPI it can track at twice that speed.
I think its unfortunate to hear that the button problem WAS real just like the Mico and that the perfect control speed is still less than that of much older mice. I'm still going to throw $60 at Zowie though, even If I have to file the buttons down and be forced to use the 2300 CPI step.
Why would you do that if you're not satisfied with the findings so far?Originally Posted by Derp
I think its unfortunate to hear that the button problem WAS real just like the Mico and that the perfect control speed is still less than that of much older mice. I'm still going to throw $60 at Zowie though, even If I have to file the buttons down and be forced to use the 2300 CPI step.
Yeah, you'd have to be pretty crazy to reach that with 24cm/360.Originally Posted by BiGsTaR
Thanks for review!
I do believe you should clean your mousepad before making Perfect Control tests. It may cause inaccurate results.
2.9m/s Perfect control at 450 DPI is pretty good TBH. I'm pretty sure it'll be enough for me. I do ~24cm per 360.
I hope HiiYaa will post his review pretty soon, coz this point I'm pretty sure I'll order AM as soon as it shows in my country.
Btw. Ramla your the reason I didn't bought Mamba, and I'm thankful for that.
Keep up the good work.!
Well, the only mouse that really competes with this shape and sensor-wise is the Xai/Sensei. And the Xai is not an option for me personally for a few reasons, so that leaves one option (at least for me)
The price in U.S. dollars I consider great, though the euro price seems much higher. Keep in mind how much newer and smaller Zowie is and how little they sell compared to the big guys (and Razer charges high prices for what I consider to be below average quality). I can relate with you on the brand preferences, personally I won't buy a Razer or SS product anymore unless it ends up being exceptional and better than what they've done so far. Microsoft and Logitech just put out generally solidly made gaming products with good warranties, they are the shining knights of the industry, too bad they haven't targeted me personally yet, I wish either made a gaming 3.0 or IMO1.1 shaped mouse.Originally Posted by toopz
I am not going to buy AM!
Zowiegears mice are very expensive even tho they cost much less than actual price should be.
Actually I am done with following companies!
1st one is Puretrack! Never ever gonna buy their ****!
2nd Zowie gear (experienced both of previous mice! nothing special)
3rd Razer (Enough of them lol blindly making mice with twin eye sensor and jittery idiotic shape like Abyssus)
Only best mouse they made was Deathadder 3G
I will continue to buy small light weight mice without Pixart sensor from Logitech and Steelseries!