Quote:
Originally Posted by bojinglebells 
how is its performance at 800?
IMO 800/900 is just about the perfect DPI for me, which is why the Abyssus was so disappointing only having 450/1800/3500 for DPI options even though I've always loved that shape from Razer starting with the Salmosa.
I've been using a Xai for a long time now despite its sensor flaws because I think its shape is so very near perfect for my grip. The Kinzu feels awesome as well but the sensor and feet were terribly garbage the overall mouse was a waste even though I got it for like $16 on some crazy Newegg sale.
how is its performance at 800?
IMO 800/900 is just about the perfect DPI for me, which is why the Abyssus was so disappointing only having 450/1800/3500 for DPI options even though I've always loved that shape from Razer starting with the Salmosa.
I've been using a Xai for a long time now despite its sensor flaws because I think its shape is so very near perfect for my grip. The Kinzu feels awesome as well but the sensor and feet were terribly garbage the overall mouse was a waste even though I got it for like $16 on some crazy Newegg sale.
I posted a paint image that shows the tracking at 800CPI and my post before that shows the perfect control speed that Enotus claims. If the pixel jumping bug wasn't there then it wouldn't be a bad sensor in my opinion.
EDIT: Ill post them in this post too, asking someone to dig through a thread can be annoying
.
Quote:
Originally Posted by pontiuz
This would be fraud.
If my Kana has this crappy plastic feet, I will claim refund immediately.
This would be fraud.
If my Kana has this crappy plastic feet, I will claim refund immediately.
Yeah it kinda left me disappointed.
They claimed to have fixed the pixel jumping bug. They didn't
They claimed to have upgraded the Kana's feet. They didn't
They claimed to have upgraded the Kana's switches. They didn't.
Edited by Derp - 1/6/12 at 1:17pm
Vintage 2008 i7
(15 items) |
|
Vintage 2008 i7
(15 items) |
