Overclock.net › Forums › Components › Monitors and Displays › Dell U2412M 24inch And Gaming
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

Dell U2412M 24inch And Gaming - Page 2

post #11 of 78
well how much of a difference will there be between 16:9 and 16:10. Do you lose left and right viewing or do you simply gain more up and down when using 16:10 as oppossed to 16:9??

In terms of gaming this Dell has a very low input lag and from reviews I have read it has minal ghosting when comparred to even alot of TN panels. Dell even has it listed on their website under gaming monitor.
Edited by sdmodified - 7/26/12 at 9:07am
post #12 of 78
Quote:
Originally Posted by sdmodified View Post

well how much of a difference will there be between 16:9 and 16:10. Do you lose left and right viewing or do you simply gain more up and down when using 16:10 as oppossed to 16:9??

Games can do either. On the desktop your viewable area is equal to your resolution.
Toki
(10 items)
 
  
CPUGraphicsRAMHard Drive
[i7 860] [XFX 5870] [4x2gb] [WD 500gb] 
OSMonitorKeyboardPower
[W7] [HP LP3065 - CrossOver 27Q LED-P - Acer x243w] Ducky DK1087-CELLB Tenkeyless, MX Blue - Steels... [LC power 750W] 
Audio
[ATH-A700] + [Asus Xonar DG] 
  hide details  
Reply
Toki
(10 items)
 
  
CPUGraphicsRAMHard Drive
[i7 860] [XFX 5870] [4x2gb] [WD 500gb] 
OSMonitorKeyboardPower
[W7] [HP LP3065 - CrossOver 27Q LED-P - Acer x243w] Ducky DK1087-CELLB Tenkeyless, MX Blue - Steels... [LC power 750W] 
Audio
[ATH-A700] + [Asus Xonar DG] 
  hide details  
Reply
post #13 of 78
As I said before. Modern games are made for 16:9. Usually you lose field of view using a 16:10 monitor. Sometimes you get black bars.

If you are going to buy a gaming monitor you obviously buy one with a 16:9 resolution.
Edited by Hydros - 7/26/12 at 9:26am
post #14 of 78
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hydros View Post

As I said before. Modern games are made for 16:9. Usually you lose field of view using a 16:10 monitor. Sometimes you get black bars.
If you are going to buy a gaming monitor you obviously buy one with a 16:9 resolution.

well this is a deffinate concern for me. Now I am thinking about possibly going with the BenQ XL2420T.. a bit more expense and TN but the 120Hz is appealing to me. Ohhhh.... decisions, decisions.
post #15 of 78
Quote:
Originally Posted by sdmodified View Post

Quote:
Originally Posted by Hydros View Post

As I said before. Modern games are made for 16:9. Usually you lose field of view using a 16:10 monitor. Sometimes you get black bars.
If you are going to buy a gaming monitor you obviously buy one with a 16:9 resolution.

well this is a deffinate concern for me. Now I am thinking about possibly going with the BenQ XL2420T.. a bit more expense and TN but the 120Hz is appealing to me. Ohhhh.... decisions, decisions.

You shouldn't really choose a monitor based on aspect ratio, even less so if the difference is as trivial as 16:9 vs 16:10. Some games have less field of view horizontally with 16:10, some more vertically. Depends on the game. Very very few games have black bars, those are rare. Most of what hydros says is blatant misinformation. I advice not listening to his posts, or at least take them with a grain of salt. He has been at it ever since he signed up and has been proven wrong countless times. He just keeps going though.

If you want a 3D capable monitor, the XL2420T is a decent choice for that. However, for non-3d content, the samsung S23A700d is generally a much better model and the VG236HE is a good option as well. If you're mostly looking at 2D content, these models are mostly better. (Glossy as well, if you like / dislike that, just so you know). These should also prove to be cheaper than going with the XL2420T.
Toki
(10 items)
 
  
CPUGraphicsRAMHard Drive
[i7 860] [XFX 5870] [4x2gb] [WD 500gb] 
OSMonitorKeyboardPower
[W7] [HP LP3065 - CrossOver 27Q LED-P - Acer x243w] Ducky DK1087-CELLB Tenkeyless, MX Blue - Steels... [LC power 750W] 
Audio
[ATH-A700] + [Asus Xonar DG] 
  hide details  
Reply
Toki
(10 items)
 
  
CPUGraphicsRAMHard Drive
[i7 860] [XFX 5870] [4x2gb] [WD 500gb] 
OSMonitorKeyboardPower
[W7] [HP LP3065 - CrossOver 27Q LED-P - Acer x243w] Ducky DK1087-CELLB Tenkeyless, MX Blue - Steels... [LC power 750W] 
Audio
[ATH-A700] + [Asus Xonar DG] 
  hide details  
Reply
post #16 of 78
Cream of the crop list for 1080p / 1200p gaming:

23" 120hz glossy 2D gaming = S23A700D (best for 2D gaming, amazing colors, best picture quality for 120hz TN, horrible height/tilt adjustment)
24" 120hz matted 2D/3D gaming = BenQ XL2420T (bigger screen, better for 3D, colors not as good, amazing height/tilt adjustment)

24" 1200p IPS for gaming = U2412M

I'd pick from one of these 3 monitors for 1080p/1200p gaming...unless you want a high resolution IPS glossy Korean monitor from ebay...besides that, I would forget any other monitor on the market.

FYI - I have both 120hz (S23A750D) and IPS (HP zr24w) in dual screen mode...and it's very hard to pick a favorite...I like both of them for different reasons...see thread in my sig "Dual Screens: IPS & 120hz" for more thoughts/opinions.
Edited by malikq86 - 7/26/12 at 12:21pm
reQuiem
(16 items)
 
  
Reply
reQuiem
(16 items)
 
  
Reply
post #17 of 78
malik and de-zant. Very good info. I am going to have to take a second look at the samsung. I really appreicate the constructive feedback. I am focused on one of the three we discussed, just need to make a final discusion. Koreans are out because I am sticking with my gtx480 and not looking to upgrade for higher resolution gaming. Thanks again fellas.
post #18 of 78
It is intresting to read Dezants lies in this thread.

Bad for him is that it is easy to spot his lies.

Search for
"Anamorphic widescreengaming"
"Hor+ widescreen gaming"
"Vert- widescreen gaming"
And you will get lists from widescreengaming which shows that nowadays vert- is just as rare as anamorphic and the vast majority of all games from recent years are hor+ which means that you have disadvantage if you have a 16:10 resolution.
post #19 of 78
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hydros View Post

It is intresting to read Dezants lies in this thread.
Bad for him is that it is easy to spot his lies.
Search for
"Anamorphic widescreengaming"
"Hor+ widescreen gaming"
"Vert- widescreen gaming"
And you will get lists from widescreengaming which shows that nowadays vert- is just as rare as anamorphic and the vast majority of all games from recent years are hor+ which means that you have disadvantage if you have a 16:10 resolution.

Always ignore Hydro...he is the definition of being extremely biased and closed minded. He is also the biggest 16:9 fanboi on these forums (see his sig) and isn't willing to consider any other ratio because he thinks the benefits of slightly more horizontal views will always crush any benefit of more vertical pixels with a different ratio since it isn't mainstream. The fact that the market mass produces 16:9...to save money/pixels....doesn't mean it's better...its very subjective. Many people enjoy gaming more on 16:10 more than 16:9 because it fits / feels better with their natural field of vision. He also always smells like a troll...so I wouldn't trust anything he says. rolleyes.gif
Edited by malikq86 - 7/26/12 at 12:54pm
reQuiem
(16 items)
 
  
Reply
reQuiem
(16 items)
 
  
Reply
post #20 of 78
Malik. Stay to the subject.

You obviously dont like it but it is facts that the vast majority of games today are hor+ which means that you get bigger field of view with a 16:9 monitor.

Threadstarter. Simply look at the facts yourself and you will see that for gaming 16:9 is more suitable than 16:10.

Dont listen to Malik and Dezant which are pissed off because 16:10 has dissapeared from the shelves.
Edited by Hydros - 7/26/12 at 1:00pm
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: Monitors and Displays
Overclock.net › Forums › Components › Monitors and Displays › Dell U2412M 24inch And Gaming