Quote:
It definitely varies per chip. The concept of overclocking is that we are using up margin that Intel has in their system to account for variability in their manufacturing process and in order to stay within a thermal and power envelope. As with any real life manufactured item, you don't really know how much margin you have until you fully test it. Intel does some testing and does that to bin chips into the various categories, but it is still only rudimentary testing.
Quote:
Anyways I'm desperately trying to get stable at 4.8 (hopefully 5.0 after that)
If you followed the guide, then you walked your way down until you were stable enough to boot and then walked your way back up to the 4.8 GHz. You may have noticed a few things as you were walking your multiplier back up. First you probably noticed that you were having to increase your turbo boost core voltage. The error messages from blue screens of death of windows give you a hint as to what each value had to be changed if you followed the notes of what they mean. You likely have also had to increase your VCCIO/VTT/QPI voltage, possibly your RAM voltage and possibly had to increase your RAM timings to get stable. For me 4.8 was the real start of the test, so you may not have tried some of these.
Quote:
I'm running the blen test on Prime95 and though it is fine so far (5min in) I'm sure it will crash soon (as it did last time)
I cheat a bit and use IntelBurnTest on "Very High" since it does very well at causing the early crashes to happen very fast. It doesn't do all of it, but it helped me get closer quicker than just Prime95 alone.
Quote:
Anyways I wanted to ask if there were any stand out settings that seem off. How is my vcore voltage and temps?
Is that the hottest your cores are getting? Personally I have Coretemp running at all times since it records the maximum temperature in addition. I've kept mine below 80 as best as I could. Your Vcore is higher than mine is at 4.8, but it doesn't look completely out of bed. I'm guessing you are air cooling.
Quote:
Also I disabled C3 and C6.
Am I trying to clock too high?
I guess I'm just looking for some specific numbers, I feel like I'm just putting random vcore temps, I'm in the dark!
Thanks so much in advanced for any help.
EDIT: Yep it just crashed about 10min in, screen froze and then rebooted. Tried changing PLL to 1.70 and lowered vcore slightly.....again just shots in the dark based of little tid bits of what I have read,
Also I disabled C3 and C6.
Am I trying to clock too high?
I guess I'm just looking for some specific numbers, I feel like I'm just putting random vcore temps, I'm in the dark!
Thanks so much in advanced for any help.
EDIT: Yep it just crashed about 10min in, screen froze and then rebooted. Tried changing PLL to 1.70 and lowered vcore slightly.....again just shots in the dark based of little tid bits of what I have read,
The way that I've got where I am is careful methodical adjustments and paying attention to every blue screen error. I was using a spreadsheet to detail what I changed each time, but a friend (one of the LN2 extreme folk) just uses a notebook to keep track as he goes along. I have been noting "trends" as I go along so I can make a guess as to how much of a change I need to make rather than just randomly changing a value. You might be clocking too high for how much cooling you have available. If you haven't done it, you should try to get stable at 4.7 or perhaps 4.6 to see where that puts you for temperatures as the voltages will be slightly higher for 4.8 and the temperatures will be higher as well. When I got the screen freezing without blue screening, it was a mixture of RAM timing, VTT/QPI/VCCIO, and RAM voltage. I upped the RAM voltage a bit along with the VTT and that was enough to get a blue screen which indicated that the timing/ram voltage/vtt were too low.
What was the last set of BSOD messages you got?
Can you show us your actual settings page as well as the monitor page?























