Quote:
Originally Posted by Detroitsoldier 
My interpretation was that the OP worked for Lamptron. He was in charge of ordering parts from the factory that makes Lamptron equipment and had to pay up front for the equipment himself, then get reimbursed by Lamptron. He is (to my understanding) saying that Lamptron never paid him for what he bought from the factory, but they say that they paid him. After he demanded to be paid for what he purchased from the factory for Lamptron, they fired him. He now has all of this extra inventory and decided to take the opportunity to start his own business and sell the Lamptron products under his own business' name G-VANS.
Feel free to correct me if I'm wrong.
My interpretation was that the OP worked for Lamptron. He was in charge of ordering parts from the factory that makes Lamptron equipment and had to pay up front for the equipment himself, then get reimbursed by Lamptron. He is (to my understanding) saying that Lamptron never paid him for what he bought from the factory, but they say that they paid him. After he demanded to be paid for what he purchased from the factory for Lamptron, they fired him. He now has all of this extra inventory and decided to take the opportunity to start his own business and sell the Lamptron products under his own business' name G-VANS.
Feel free to correct me if I'm wrong.
Your interpretation is sort of correct, yes the person worked for Lamptron in charge of ordering, but I have personally broken down from the statement and what I know already (that is part of our public statement) is that the person was fired for not managing the company budget properly, which put the company in debt. Then proceeded to sue Lamptron in court, and lost the court case, and then used whatever they had acquired when they left to reproduce the products and make back the loss that they claim they have. Now I have all of the official findings, im just trying to verify what goes public and what doesn't.
