Quote:
Originally Posted by mcg75 
For the record, here are some published figures on ssd defect rates.
- Intel 0.1%
- Crucial 0.8%
- Corsair 2.9%
- OCZ 4.2%
These numbers were used by Intel during release of the 520 drive. They are not the source of the numbers either.
Source can be found here.

For the record, here are some published figures on ssd defect rates.
- Intel 0.1%
- Crucial 0.8%
- Corsair 2.9%
- OCZ 4.2%
These numbers were used by Intel during release of the 520 drive. They are not the source of the numbers either.
Source can be found here.
Which says basically nothing given the enormous amount of Sandforce-controlled OCZ drives included in those results.If you know OCZ's Sandforce drives have high defect rates,why would you judge a different product with those results?I am not pro OCZ,I could care less actually.More relevant would be defect rates on OCZ-Indillinx controlled drives,then you can compare.







The Petrol has a good price, but I'm weary of OCZ...