Quote:
Originally Posted by pioneerisloud 
Why are you guys talking about G92 so much?
8800GTX (G80) were released in November of 2006. The 8800GT / GTS 512 (G92) were released in October of 2007, and rebranded for 3 generations. And guess what? The G80 was still 10-15% faster (GTX / Ultra).
How can you POSSIBLY say that G92 was a success when the G80 still walked all over it?

Why are you guys talking about G92 so much?

8800GTX (G80) were released in November of 2006. The 8800GT / GTS 512 (G92) were released in October of 2007, and rebranded for 3 generations. And guess what? The G80 was still 10-15% faster (GTX / Ultra).
How can you POSSIBLY say that G92 was a success when the G80 still walked all over it?

That's the whole point, Fermi didn't bring what G80 did, so G92 fits more to what a GF100 would live up to comparison wise which it doesn't in the longevity/efficiency department.
Pretty much sums up why i think G92 was brought up in here. Just besides a good budget card I don't think the GTX470 set much precedence. G80 pulled the shock and awe while G92 standardized it for all.






Just an FYI.
[not sure that even the 7970 can handle Ubersampling]).