Originally Posted by youra6
That is not only unhelpful but rude.
Originally Posted by Mkilbride
Yeap, really helpful thread, I read the first 10 pages and it was nothing but bad news about this monitor.
However, there is 327 pages. I'm not going to read them all, so I asked a simple question, and got bashed for it.
Real nice, could be a simple, yes or nor, and telling me, maybe you could copy and paste it from your fountain of knowledge.
Obviously, the answer is yes - assuming you can live with the risk of pixel issues, powerbrick issues, backlight issues, dust behind the glass issues, or the one hundred dollar cost of shipping a defective or DOA monitor back to korea. FROM THE POLL AT THE BEGINNING OF THE THREAD - there is about a 1/6 chance of any of these defects. Can you live with that chance? Can you live with any or all of those defects? Does the fact that for only 100 bucks more than a U2412m for almost 60% more pixels and full 8-bit IPS color as opposed to the u2412m's dithered 6 bit IPS color?
We cannot answer those questions for you. Only you can. Everyone's tolerance for these things are different, which is why these threads are so long - to give everyone enough information to judge for themselves
if it is worth it.
With all due respect to youra6, scribby and skyPC, I think what is rude is someone doing a TLDR and asking everyone to repeat what they've already posted in the rest of the threads, making the threads even longer for no other reason than a bit of laziness, therefore making it even harder to glean new information, if any, from the thread due to all the repetetive information that is in the "TLDR tell me what you already said three times before" posts.
*shrug* Obviously, YMMV...