I have read most of this long thread and still have some questions. I am about to make an order for either Achieva ShiMian QH270-Lite or a CrossOver 27Q. Not going for CatLeap because of the taller stand (need this to fit under one of my wall shelves over my desk). Basically deciding on the aesthetics and whether the lack of the white trim on the CrossOver vs. Achieva is worth the ~$40 premium. Here is something else that I'm wondering about - is the CrossOver 27Q model going to have the internal adjustment panel for brightness, presets, and what not? (as the Achieva one does not).
Another thing I'm a bit confused about is the difference between Achieve ShiMian QH270-Lite and QH270 IPSBS. One seller writes the following : "QH270-IPSBS mode is higher version than QH270-lite model High Grade LG S-IPS pannel. " Does this imply better image quality or simply that IPSBS has operational speakers (which I do not care about, as I have other dedicated speakers)? The price difference between the two models is $7.50 from ta_planet.
Another thing is the decision between sellers... ta_planet seems to be checking his (their) monitors and being nice about it (?) vs. the [almost] cheapest Green-sum I'm not so sure about.
So it's basically between a $320 Achieva ShiMian AH270-Lite and $366 CrossOver 27Q.
For reference, I gave my good card to a friend and using an XFX 9800GT right now (which is listed as compatible) until I get a 7850 or one of the upcoming nVidia 6** cards.
P.S.: I don't know if this extra testing CatLeap monitors go through to ensure quality is evident in practice, but at least according to this thread's poll, it appears that CatLeap monitors have fewer defects in proportion to the number of purchases vs. the Achieva ones... I am worried about not only dead / stuck pixels but also backlight unevenness and color variations.
Any input would be very welcome!
Edited by ElevenEleven - 5/9/12 at 10:00pm
Another thing I'm a bit confused about is the difference between Achieve ShiMian QH270-Lite and QH270 IPSBS. One seller writes the following : "QH270-IPSBS mode is higher version than QH270-lite model High Grade LG S-IPS pannel. " Does this imply better image quality or simply that IPSBS has operational speakers (which I do not care about, as I have other dedicated speakers)? The price difference between the two models is $7.50 from ta_planet.
Another thing is the decision between sellers... ta_planet seems to be checking his (their) monitors and being nice about it (?) vs. the [almost] cheapest Green-sum I'm not so sure about.
So it's basically between a $320 Achieva ShiMian AH270-Lite and $366 CrossOver 27Q.
For reference, I gave my good card to a friend and using an XFX 9800GT right now (which is listed as compatible) until I get a 7850 or one of the upcoming nVidia 6** cards.
P.S.: I don't know if this extra testing CatLeap monitors go through to ensure quality is evident in practice, but at least according to this thread's poll, it appears that CatLeap monitors have fewer defects in proportion to the number of purchases vs. the Achieva ones... I am worried about not only dead / stuck pixels but also backlight unevenness and color variations.
Any input would be very welcome!
Edited by ElevenEleven - 5/9/12 at 10:00pm


















