Quote:
Originally Posted by
The_Rocker 
Ok thats fair enough but by doing it the 'physical' way, you are going to limit yourself by only having one old box.
I am looking at getting 2 dual core cpus. Plenty of space in there for at least 2 VM's... Not as if i want 1 single core xeon.
http://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/MATCHED-PAIR-AMD-OPTERON-DUAL-CORE-285-2-6GHZ-940-OSA285FAA6CB-CPU-PROCESSOR-/160732475978?pt=UK_Motherboards_CPUs&hash=item256c66f24a
Taking on board all the feedback, i will go for VMs to build a virtual network on this machine. 2-3 VMs atm, should be enouth for the moment.
Now back to the last question, which OS is best for running VM's in?
Quote:
Are you looking to go working in a windows based infrastructure? In that case go with Server 2003.
Not sure, we have only done the basic Advantages vs Disadvantages of Apache vs Server 03... The computer course i am on atm it very theretical, user policies and programming based. Not to leave out Digital graphics, that was thrown in there for _____ and giggles.
So basically, as for Server OS, the door is open. I do dislike the newer Microsoft OS's in general and i have some experance with Linux in the form of Ubuntu, backtrack and Mint.
I was just reaqding one of my main 3 choice specs, and they are all cisco heavy, so anything that can provide me with a good foundation work for that would be helpful.
-Edit-
Reading back on everything I will admit I am now confused with what i actually want. So if I build a machine, based on 2 of the cpu mentioned above, I should be able to run VMs on it, and gain the number of machines need to set up a basic, virtual network.
Just re- evaluating, my main aim is to gain experance with the actual tech involved in the backbones of a network.
I will re-read everything more when i get home. I am in college during the hols doing work...

But i should be compleately up-to-date with everything, including re-subs.
