Overclock.net › Forums › Consumer Electronics › Photography › LR3.6 vs LR4 Beta
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

LR3.6 vs LR4 Beta

post #1 of 3
Thread Starter 
Hey all,

I've been trying out the Lightroom 3.6 trial and I like it so far, but how much better is the Lightroom 4 Beta's processing engine?(LR3 is 2010, while the LR4 Beta is the latest 2012). I know the beta is free but I haven't tried installing it yet.

Could you get the same changes in post processing with Lightroom 3 as in Lightroom 4 Beta, but it would take more effort?
post #2 of 3
I only played with the beta for a few hours and I couldn't see a difference really.
HAF XB
(14 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
Intel i7 940 EVGA X58 3xSLI R9 280x G-Skill 12Gb 
Hard DriveOptical DriveCoolingOS
Kingston hyper X none Corsair H60 Push/Pull Windows 10 
MonitorPowerCase
Samsung B2330 Coolermaster silent pro 850w Cooler Master HAF XB 
  hide details  
Reply
HAF XB
(14 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
Intel i7 940 EVGA X58 3xSLI R9 280x G-Skill 12Gb 
Hard DriveOptical DriveCoolingOS
Kingston hyper X none Corsair H60 Push/Pull Windows 10 
MonitorPowerCase
Samsung B2330 Coolermaster silent pro 850w Cooler Master HAF XB 
  hide details  
Reply
post #3 of 3
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by ClickJacker View Post

I only played with the beta for a few hours and I couldn't see a difference really.

Really? I see....I was watching a video on Youtube where the guy compared the 2010 engine to the 2012 and the 2012 looked better with the same adjustments. You could probably get the same results with LR3, but would take more effort is what I'm thinking.
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: Photography
Overclock.net › Forums › Consumer Electronics › Photography › LR3.6 vs LR4 Beta