Overclock.net › Forums › Components › Monitors and Displays › What does Response Time 2 ms (Gray to gray) mean in specs?
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

What does Response Time 2 ms (Gray to gray) mean in specs?

post #1 of 10
Thread Starter 
What does Response Time 2 ms (Gray to gray) mean in specs? Got a new ASUS VG278H monitor and was curios what that spec actually meant?
     
  hide details  
Reply
     
  hide details  
Reply
post #2 of 10
Its basically the time it takes for a pixel to change from one color value to another. Faster response time means less ghosting.
SFF Goodness
(17 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
i7 4770k ASRock z87m OC formula MSI GTX 780 GAMING 8GB G Skill Ripjaw DDR3 2400MHz 
Hard DriveHard DriveCoolingOS
SanDisk Extreme II 480 GB Seagate 2TB Noctua NH-D14 Windows 8.1 Pro 
MonitorKeyboardPowerCase
Dell U2312HM x3 Das Model S Professional Silverstone Strider Gold Evolution 750w Silverstone SG10 
MouseAudioAudioAudio
Logitech G500 Xfi Titanium HD Audioengine 5+ Velodyne Impact 12 
  hide details  
Reply
SFF Goodness
(17 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
i7 4770k ASRock z87m OC formula MSI GTX 780 GAMING 8GB G Skill Ripjaw DDR3 2400MHz 
Hard DriveHard DriveCoolingOS
SanDisk Extreme II 480 GB Seagate 2TB Noctua NH-D14 Windows 8.1 Pro 
MonitorKeyboardPowerCase
Dell U2312HM x3 Das Model S Professional Silverstone Strider Gold Evolution 750w Silverstone SG10 
MouseAudioAudioAudio
Logitech G500 Xfi Titanium HD Audioengine 5+ Velodyne Impact 12 
  hide details  
Reply
post #3 of 10
yah..2ms response time is good :thumb.gif: the majority of monitors (lcd) are 5 ms
 
Thuban Powah!
(14 items)
 
 
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
Xeon X5650 Asus P6X58D-E Sapphire HD 7950 G.Skill Trident-X 2600 CL10 
Hard DriveCoolingPowerCase
Samsung 840 pro Bong cooler / RASA waterblock Rosewill Capstone Gold 750 None 
MouseMouse PadAudio
cheap! Newegg box panel ibeats with onboard. 
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
AMD Phenom II X6 1075T w/2 cores locked @ 4.2+ M4a89GTD-Pro XFX Radeon HD 5870 8gb Samsung ddr3 1600 11-11-11-28@ 8-8-8-24 
Hard DriveHard DriveOptical DriveCooling
OCZ Agility2 40gb WD Blue 500GB Lite-On RASA waterblock 
OSMonitorKeyboardPower
Windows & Linux Samsung 1080p 2 ms Dell Thermaltake TR2-800 
CaseMouse
Cooler Master Elite 330 (was) cheap 
  hide details  
Reply
 
Thuban Powah!
(14 items)
 
 
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
Xeon X5650 Asus P6X58D-E Sapphire HD 7950 G.Skill Trident-X 2600 CL10 
Hard DriveCoolingPowerCase
Samsung 840 pro Bong cooler / RASA waterblock Rosewill Capstone Gold 750 None 
MouseMouse PadAudio
cheap! Newegg box panel ibeats with onboard. 
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
AMD Phenom II X6 1075T w/2 cores locked @ 4.2+ M4a89GTD-Pro XFX Radeon HD 5870 8gb Samsung ddr3 1600 11-11-11-28@ 8-8-8-24 
Hard DriveHard DriveOptical DriveCooling
OCZ Agility2 40gb WD Blue 500GB Lite-On RASA waterblock 
OSMonitorKeyboardPower
Windows & Linux Samsung 1080p 2 ms Dell Thermaltake TR2-800 
CaseMouse
Cooler Master Elite 330 (was) cheap 
  hide details  
Reply
post #4 of 10
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Response_time_%28technology%29
Quote:
Response time is the amount of time a pixel in an LCD monitor takes to go from one value to another and back again. It is measured in milliseconds (ms). Lower numbers mean faster transitions and therefore fewer visible image artifacts.

For an LCD display, typical response times are 8 to 16 ms for black-white-black, or 2 to 6ms for grey-to-grey.
post #5 of 10
Thread Starter 
Thanks the Gray to Gray was what I wasn't getting regarding the seek time. smile.gif
     
  hide details  
Reply
     
  hide details  
Reply
post #6 of 10
Advertised specs are meaningless. There is no industry standard for measuring response time, or contrast ratio, or anything like that. Which basically means the manufacturers can advertise any numbers they want. They will run their monitors through all the different tests that they have, then advertise whichever one has the best result, even if it's not representative of real world performance. This means that specs like response time cannot be compared between manufacturers because it becomes apples and oranges. You can't even compare specs from two different monitors from the same manufacturer, because there's no guarantee the results were achieved the same way.

The best thing to do is to have some faith in reviewers, and mostly in your own eyes.
Also, you generally get what you pay for. If you were to compare a 1080p monitor with a 2ms GtG and 50000:1 contrast ratio for $150 bucks, with another monitor with the exact same specs that costs $300, chances are VERY high that the more expensive monitor will look and work much better. Thus proving that the advertised numbers count for nothing.
Edited by wedge - 2/27/12 at 7:46pm
Death Star
(21 items)
 
Darksaber
(11 items)
 
 
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
Athlon II x2 245 Asus M3A78 Radeon HD6570 1GB Mushkin Silverline 2GB DDR2  
Hard DriveOptical DriveOSMonitor
OCZ Vertex 2 120GB Samsung Blu-Ray Windows 7 Samsung 46" DLP 
PowerCaseOther
Silverstone Strider Essentials 400W Silverstone Milo ML03B Hauppage WinTV 1250 
  hide details  
Reply
Death Star
(21 items)
 
Darksaber
(11 items)
 
 
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
Athlon II x2 245 Asus M3A78 Radeon HD6570 1GB Mushkin Silverline 2GB DDR2  
Hard DriveOptical DriveOSMonitor
OCZ Vertex 2 120GB Samsung Blu-Ray Windows 7 Samsung 46" DLP 
PowerCaseOther
Silverstone Strider Essentials 400W Silverstone Milo ML03B Hauppage WinTV 1250 
  hide details  
Reply
post #7 of 10
^^ Above is spot on. Just an idea of how different response time specs can translate to much different real-world performance...

The following images, from tftcentral, are photographs taken of a little image quickly moving horizontally across various computer monitors, to see the pixel responsiveness of each. The left image is the best-case scenario and the right image is the worst-case scenario. The slower the monitor is in changing the state of the pixels, the more ghosting / smearing / whatever you want to call it, there is.

122
AOC i2353Ph - rated 5 ms

104
Asus ML239H - rated 5 ms

120
Dell U2311H - rated 8ms [wait a sec, that's "worse" than the AOC above]

113
NEC EA232WMI - rated 14ms [so obviously way worse than the AOC, right?]

111
BenQ XL2410T - rated 2ms [note the heavy dark shadow is over-aggressive overshoot]

106
Samsung 2233RZ - rated 3ms

I'm not ragging on AOC in particular, just one example. This is why you can't just look at the advertised spec and expect anything much in particular.
Edited by mikeaj - 2/27/12 at 10:36pm
post #8 of 10
Thread Starter 
Thanks for those explanations. I knew about seek time but wasn't sure why some have 'Gray to Gray' or 'Black to Black' etc. Good clarifications. smile.gif
     
  hide details  
Reply
     
  hide details  
Reply
post #9 of 10
Thank you mikeaj for taking the time to answer this question. Your pictures were worth a thousand articles... Greg
post #10 of 10
A very useful and in-depth read relevant to this thread is an article on my site entitled 'The factors affecting PC Monitor responsiveness'. Why you should always look beyond quoted response times. smile.gif

Edit: Didn't realise this thread was so old. tongue.gif
Edited by PCM2 - 5/27/14 at 2:19pm
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: Monitors and Displays
Overclock.net › Forums › Components › Monitors and Displays › What does Response Time 2 ms (Gray to gray) mean in specs?