Ignorant. Sigh. He clearly said he knows that the Internet is used for both legitimate and illegitimate purposes - but they went above and beyond to make sure that the illegitimate uses are kept at a minimum and fully cooperated with film studios etc.
Right. It's okay for you to believe Kim, but not for me to believe the FBI.
The claim is that Kim is a liar and from what I have read about him I believe he is a liar. A former hacker and someone who obviously has no ethics. No, I don't believe him and you do. This is your right and that is my right.
I believe he KNOWINGLY used his empire to disseminate stolen property to profit from it. Am I right? I have no idea. We will see when the case is presented. Until the time the jury comes back with a verdict of innocent I will believe he is guilty.
Until the jury comes back with a guilty verdict you will believe he is innocent.
However, I'm ignorant because of this and I guess you're some kind of genius. I'm glad we had that discussion. /end
I said you are ignorant because you did not know what the DMCA covers. You did not prove me wrong.
I have read the DMCA. I truly believe he violated it if the FBI's allegations are correct. I have no reason to believe they're not and as of right now I believe them to be true. Of course it needs to be proven in the court of law and I believe that will happen. I understand that you don't. Differing opinions. I don't think you're ignorant because you don't see it my way.
EDIT: However, the donkey and shouldn't be alive ones were completely unacceptable and I'm very upset at the individuals who posted them.
Much appreciated. Edited by Humafold - 3/2/12 at 11:31am