Despite enraging Scribby I'm going to respond to these last few comments. He asked everyone to stop posting about this topic in this thread though so I don't know why yall failed to follow his request. Please take this conversation to its own thread as it's gotten well past the point of comparing 2560x1440 to 1920x1280. Scribby, I sincerely apologize for going off topic before and now but, this post needs to be made as a result of gross misinformation that could lead both Neo Mike and lurkers down the wrong path when it comes to this topic and it needs to be addressed publicly. I'm surprised all the offending posts haven't been split off yet and, I'm sorry for making yet another one
Which is pointless because it fakes that refresh rate and it will have twice the input lag as a 60 Hz TV. Don't suggest a TV for PC usage based on the refresh rate. You can go read at AVS why it's a bad idea. I also pointed out that the set you recommended will not do 4:4:4 which means the text will be smeared and it will have problems with colour separation when used as a monitor. Please research TV usage as a monitor before you arbitrarily recommend one to someone as you can't just randomly select a TV for PC usage.
It's fake, they all are and it will add a lot of input lag. You need to use an actual 60 Hz TV that can do 4:4:4 if you plan on using it as a monitor. Then you need to make sure the input lag is 32ms or less. There are threads a mile long dedicated to these issues over at AVS.
All that having been said, please take this conversation to its own thread like Scribby asked. None of this is even remotely relevant anymore to a 2560x1440 display much less a Catleap. People (speaking in generalization and not about any one specifically) are going to start getting more agitated/frustrated/irritated/pissed off than they already are if the derailment continues and it's going to incur the wrath of the staff.
Quote:
Which is pointless because it fakes that refresh rate and it will have twice the input lag as a 60 Hz TV. Don't suggest a TV for PC usage based on the refresh rate. You can go read at AVS why it's a bad idea. I also pointed out that the set you recommended will not do 4:4:4 which means the text will be smeared and it will have problems with colour separation when used as a monitor. Please research TV usage as a monitor before you arbitrarily recommend one to someone as you can't just randomly select a TV for PC usage.
Quote:
It's fake, they all are and it will add a lot of input lag. You need to use an actual 60 Hz TV that can do 4:4:4 if you plan on using it as a monitor. Then you need to make sure the input lag is 32ms or less. There are threads a mile long dedicated to these issues over at AVS.
All that having been said, please take this conversation to its own thread like Scribby asked. None of this is even remotely relevant anymore to a 2560x1440 display much less a Catleap. People (speaking in generalization and not about any one specifically) are going to start getting more agitated/frustrated/irritated/pissed off than they already are if the derailment continues and it's going to incur the wrath of the staff.



















