Quote:
Originally Posted by mikeseth 
The PCBank 3View monitors have a slighter faster response time and slightly better contrast ratio. Whereas, the Catleaps monitors can be overclocked to 120Hz (some only, people have reported the new ones they received can not do this anymore). The Shimian, Catleaps, PCBank, Potalion, Crossovers all use the same LG based S-IPS Display (except PCBank might have a slightly better one). The main difference is the design. I asked BCC a few days ago and the seller told me the Potalion is the same as the Shimian.

The PCBank 3View monitors have a slighter faster response time and slightly better contrast ratio. Whereas, the Catleaps monitors can be overclocked to 120Hz (some only, people have reported the new ones they received can not do this anymore). The Shimian, Catleaps, PCBank, Potalion, Crossovers all use the same LG based S-IPS Display (except PCBank might have a slightly better one). The main difference is the design. I asked BCC a few days ago and the seller told me the Potalion is the same as the Shimian.
Every Korean monitor is the exact same panel. The contrast ratio, response time, and overclockability are the exact same. Old "2B" Catleaps could overclock to 120hz with the right hardware, but anything that isn't a 2B cannot. You can buy 2B Catleaps from other sources for considerably more.
Just curios where'd you hear that the PCBank has better contrast ratio/response time?


















