Overclock.net › Forums › Graphics Cards › Graphics Cards - General › 7970 vs GTX 680 - Who is the real KING? UPDATE: 7970 ~8% better clock per clock
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

7970 vs GTX 680 - Who is the real KING? UPDATE: 7970 ~8% better clock per clock - Page 34  

Poll Results: AMD 7970 of GTX 680, Who is King?

 
  • 37% (130)
    AMD 7970
  • 62% (214)
    GTX 680
344 Total Votes  
post #331 of 679
Quote:
Originally Posted by toX0rz View Post

Of course different architectures will perform differently with same clocks and thats why Kepler as an arcitecture that relies on high clocks will also OC higher under extreme cooling than AMDs card.
GCN architecture is a little bit faster if compared to Kepler at exact same clocks indeed, but how is that relevant at all?
Sorry but this just looks like a troll thread tongue.gif
I want to know clock for clock too. The purpose of it is not to decide which GPU is better, but rather to tell which is better when they're both overclocked, like in individual cases. Yes, everybody know the 680 is better at stock.
 
Cheesecake
(16 items)
 
 
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
2500k Gene-Z Gen3 MSI GTX 580 XE 1006/2012/4432 1.21v G.Skill Sniper 8 GB 1866 9-9-9-28-1T (1.44v) 
CoolingCoolingPowerCase
Kraken Lots of airflow :P TX850 version 2 Modded 
AudioAudioAudio
Xonar DX (sold) Sennheiser HD 555 FiiO E10 
CPUMotherboardGraphics
Phenom II X4 @ 4000/2800 *SOLD* ASRock Extreme4 970 *SELLING* GTX 570 @ 932/1864/4000 1.106v (24/7) *SOLD* 
  hide details  
 
Cheesecake
(16 items)
 
 
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
2500k Gene-Z Gen3 MSI GTX 580 XE 1006/2012/4432 1.21v G.Skill Sniper 8 GB 1866 9-9-9-28-1T (1.44v) 
CoolingCoolingPowerCase
Kraken Lots of airflow :P TX850 version 2 Modded 
AudioAudioAudio
Xonar DX (sold) Sennheiser HD 555 FiiO E10 
CPUMotherboardGraphics
Phenom II X4 @ 4000/2800 *SOLD* ASRock Extreme4 970 *SELLING* GTX 570 @ 932/1864/4000 1.106v (24/7) *SOLD* 
  hide details  
post #332 of 679

Quote:

Originally Posted by jtom320 View Post

Quote:
Originally Posted by ZealotKi11er View Post

For your current OC how high does the fan get in games and what temps you get? Whats your VID?

Stock volts are 1112 in AB. For 1200 voltage is upped to 1174 (which is the stock voltage for most 7970s) and for 1260 voltage is 1225. For me in order to hit 1300 I have to set voltage to it's max 1300 level. It's stable enough to bench on there but I would never use it for every day gaming. In fact I have three OC profiles, 1125 stock volts, 1200, and 1260 with the voltages you see above. If I'm playing an easy game I'll lower it down to 1125.

My fan curve has a pretty slow rise. I keep it below 45 til it hits 80 C and then it rapidly goes up. In BF3 at 1260 the average temp seems to be about 81 degrees. Honestly though I don't play games all that much. If you'd like I'll take a screen with Afterburner in the top corner in BF to give you a good idea.
 


There are 3 stock voltage 1.049, 1.11, 1.159 volts, mine is 1.049 stock.  I can't hit 1200 MHz at stock 1.049v.  Keep that in mind, there are 3 different voltages running around.

 

After about 1250 MHz, the voltage requirement for the last 100 MHz, totaling about 1357, takes about +200mV for me.  Very inefficient at the end.

 

Dead Space IV
(18 items)
 
   
CPUMotherboardGraphicsGraphics
Intel i7 3770K Gigabyte GA-Z77X-UD5H Geforce GTX 690 Geforce GTX 690 
RAMHard DriveOptical DriveOS
G.Skill RipjawX OCZ Vertex III (Max IOPS Edition) LG Blu-Ray RW Windows 8 Professional Plus 
MonitorKeyboardPowerCase
Acer GD235Hz Razer Marauder (SC2) Antec HCP 1200W CaseLabs M10 
MouseMouse PadAudioOther
Cybort R.A.T. 7 Razer Goliathus  Asus Xonar Essence STX Beyerdynamics DT990 Premium  
OtherOther
4x Seagate 1TB Barracuda 7200.12 2x Seagate 2TB Barracuda LP 5900 
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
Intel i7 3615QM Macbook Pro 2012 - Retina Chipset GeForce GT 650M 8GB DDR3L 1600 MHz 
Hard DriveOSMonitorCase
Apple/Samsung SSD Mountain Lion OSX 1.8.0.2 2880x1800 Macbook Pro 2012 15" 
MouseMouse Pad
Cyborg R.A.T. 7 Goliathus 
  hide details  
Dead Space IV
(18 items)
 
   
CPUMotherboardGraphicsGraphics
Intel i7 3770K Gigabyte GA-Z77X-UD5H Geforce GTX 690 Geforce GTX 690 
RAMHard DriveOptical DriveOS
G.Skill RipjawX OCZ Vertex III (Max IOPS Edition) LG Blu-Ray RW Windows 8 Professional Plus 
MonitorKeyboardPowerCase
Acer GD235Hz Razer Marauder (SC2) Antec HCP 1200W CaseLabs M10 
MouseMouse PadAudioOther
Cybort R.A.T. 7 Razer Goliathus  Asus Xonar Essence STX Beyerdynamics DT990 Premium  
OtherOther
4x Seagate 1TB Barracuda 7200.12 2x Seagate 2TB Barracuda LP 5900 
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
Intel i7 3615QM Macbook Pro 2012 - Retina Chipset GeForce GT 650M 8GB DDR3L 1600 MHz 
Hard DriveOSMonitorCase
Apple/Samsung SSD Mountain Lion OSX 1.8.0.2 2880x1800 Macbook Pro 2012 15" 
MouseMouse Pad
Cyborg R.A.T. 7 Goliathus 
  hide details  
post #333 of 679
Needs a neither option tongue.gif
post #334 of 679
Quote:
Originally Posted by RagingCain View Post

Quote:


There are 3 stock voltage 1.049, 1.11, 1.159 volts, mine is 1.049 stock.  I can't hit 1200 MHz at stock 1.049v.  Keep that in mind, there are 3 different voltages running around.

After about 1250 MHz, the voltage requirement for the last 100 MHz, totaling about 1357, takes about +200mV for me.  Very inefficient at the end.

Add 1.174 too the list. I can do 1175Mhz on Stock voltages. I undervolted it to 1.125v and 1125Mhz


Edit: As far as the battle goes this is the Same as HD 6970 vs GTX570. There is no GTX580 this round. So AMD and Nvidia will need another card to determine victories.
00 Raiser
(20 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
Intel Core i7 3770K @ 4.6GHz (1.365v) Gigabyte Z77X-UD5H  2 x HD 7970 3GB @ 1125/1575 MHz Kingston HyperX Predator 8GB DDR3-2400  
Hard DriveHard DriveHard DriveCooling
Intel X25-M G2 80GB Seagate Barracuda 500GB 2 x Seagate Barracuda 3TB EK Supreme HF - Full Copper 
CoolingCoolingCoolingOS
2 x EK-FC7970 - Acetal CSQ XSPC EX240 TFC X-Changer 360 Windows 7 Ultimate 
MonitorKeyboardPowerCase
Dell UltraSharp U2711  Razer BlackWidow Ultimate Corsair AX1200 NZXT Switch 810 Black 
MouseMouse PadAudioAudio
SteelSeries Sensei Ttesports Ladon  Corsair Vengeance 2000 Logitech Z-2300 
  hide details  
00 Raiser
(20 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
Intel Core i7 3770K @ 4.6GHz (1.365v) Gigabyte Z77X-UD5H  2 x HD 7970 3GB @ 1125/1575 MHz Kingston HyperX Predator 8GB DDR3-2400  
Hard DriveHard DriveHard DriveCooling
Intel X25-M G2 80GB Seagate Barracuda 500GB 2 x Seagate Barracuda 3TB EK Supreme HF - Full Copper 
CoolingCoolingCoolingOS
2 x EK-FC7970 - Acetal CSQ XSPC EX240 TFC X-Changer 360 Windows 7 Ultimate 
MonitorKeyboardPowerCase
Dell UltraSharp U2711  Razer BlackWidow Ultimate Corsair AX1200 NZXT Switch 810 Black 
MouseMouse PadAudioAudio
SteelSeries Sensei Ttesports Ladon  Corsair Vengeance 2000 Logitech Z-2300 
  hide details  
post #335 of 679
Quote:
Originally Posted by pioneerisloud View Post

Quote:
Originally Posted by Badness View Post

Well, if you're running stock, it appears the 680 is better with today's games. But this is OCN... Any word on how our community's GTX 680s are overclocking?

From what I've seen briefly, a lot of the retail cards tend to top out around 1150MHz with the +50 boost (so 1200 turbo).

at stock volts they seem to be topping out around 1200mhz.

i love this thread, i just spent a while going thru it and the main fact everybody is missing is that this 680 is the gk104, it was designed to compete with the 7800s, not the 7900s that it is currently a match for.

then we have the fact that these early results from ln2 land are with early ic, not much binning has taken place yet so wait till k|ngp|n and the likes gets an above average sample, i hear zotac are binning their top cards for 2ghz boost, imagine how fast that will go under ln2.

and thats just the hardware, not mentioned that nv tend to take a couple of shots at the driver before they get it right. launch drivers aint worth a ****, give a couple of months and then look what each card is doing then and only then will it be a fair playing field.
still frags n00bs
(14 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
2600k z68xp ud4 7950 #996997 
Hard DriveCoolingOSMonitor
kingston 64gb ssd os + sandisk extreme 120gb games ifx 14 winver 6.1 64 u HG281D 
KeyboardPowerCaseMouse
recluse 600w enermax shinobi deathadder 
  hide details  
still frags n00bs
(14 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
2600k z68xp ud4 7950 #996997 
Hard DriveCoolingOSMonitor
kingston 64gb ssd os + sandisk extreme 120gb games ifx 14 winver 6.1 64 u HG281D 
KeyboardPowerCaseMouse
recluse 600w enermax shinobi deathadder 
  hide details  
post #336 of 679
Quote:
Originally Posted by marsey99 View Post

at stock volts they seem to be topping out around 1200mhz.
i love this thread, i just spent a while going thru it and the main fact everybody is missing is that this 680 is the gk104, it was designed to compete with the 7800s, not the 7900s that it is currently a match for.
then we have the fact that these early results from ln2 land are with early ic, not much binning has taken place yet so wait till k|ngp|n and the likes gets an above average sample, i hear zotac are binning their top cards for 2ghz boost, imagine how fast that will go under ln2.
and thats just the hardware, not mentioned that nv tend to take a couple of shots at the driver before they get it right. launch drivers aint worth a ****, give a couple of months and then look what each card is doing then and only then will it be a fair playing field.

Yeah it can compete with HD 7870 if AMD clocked it up 1.4Ghz,
00 Raiser
(20 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
Intel Core i7 3770K @ 4.6GHz (1.365v) Gigabyte Z77X-UD5H  2 x HD 7970 3GB @ 1125/1575 MHz Kingston HyperX Predator 8GB DDR3-2400  
Hard DriveHard DriveHard DriveCooling
Intel X25-M G2 80GB Seagate Barracuda 500GB 2 x Seagate Barracuda 3TB EK Supreme HF - Full Copper 
CoolingCoolingCoolingOS
2 x EK-FC7970 - Acetal CSQ XSPC EX240 TFC X-Changer 360 Windows 7 Ultimate 
MonitorKeyboardPowerCase
Dell UltraSharp U2711  Razer BlackWidow Ultimate Corsair AX1200 NZXT Switch 810 Black 
MouseMouse PadAudioAudio
SteelSeries Sensei Ttesports Ladon  Corsair Vengeance 2000 Logitech Z-2300 
  hide details  
00 Raiser
(20 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
Intel Core i7 3770K @ 4.6GHz (1.365v) Gigabyte Z77X-UD5H  2 x HD 7970 3GB @ 1125/1575 MHz Kingston HyperX Predator 8GB DDR3-2400  
Hard DriveHard DriveHard DriveCooling
Intel X25-M G2 80GB Seagate Barracuda 500GB 2 x Seagate Barracuda 3TB EK Supreme HF - Full Copper 
CoolingCoolingCoolingOS
2 x EK-FC7970 - Acetal CSQ XSPC EX240 TFC X-Changer 360 Windows 7 Ultimate 
MonitorKeyboardPowerCase
Dell UltraSharp U2711  Razer BlackWidow Ultimate Corsair AX1200 NZXT Switch 810 Black 
MouseMouse PadAudioAudio
SteelSeries Sensei Ttesports Ladon  Corsair Vengeance 2000 Logitech Z-2300 
  hide details  
post #337 of 679
Quote:
Originally Posted by RagingCain View Post

Quote:


There are 3 stock voltage 1.049, 1.11, 1.159 volts, mine is 1.049 stock.  I can't hit 1200 MHz at stock 1.049v.  Keep that in mind, there are 3 different voltages running around.

After about 1250 MHz, the voltage requirement for the last 100 MHz, totaling about 1357, takes about +200mV for me.  Very inefficient at the end.

That's why you got such great OC's you have the low voltage model. Wish I had it but I'm ok being in the middle. Way better then my absolutely awful 2500k.
OP MicroATX build
(14 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
Intel Core i5 2500K Asus Pz68m pro EVGA GTX GTX 670 Corsair 8GB 1600 Vengence 
Hard DriveHard DriveHard DriveOptical Drive
Crucial M4 Raid 0 Crucial M4 Raid 0 WD Data Drive LG Blu-Ray 
CoolingOSPowerCase
Antec Kuhler 920 Seasonic X series 750 gold Define Mini 
  hide details  
OP MicroATX build
(14 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
Intel Core i5 2500K Asus Pz68m pro EVGA GTX GTX 670 Corsair 8GB 1600 Vengence 
Hard DriveHard DriveHard DriveOptical Drive
Crucial M4 Raid 0 Crucial M4 Raid 0 WD Data Drive LG Blu-Ray 
CoolingOSPowerCase
Antec Kuhler 920 Seasonic X series 750 gold Define Mini 
  hide details  
post #338 of 679
I think people should just buy GPU whatever games that performs better.
I mainly play WoW and 7970 doesn't really perform well compared to nvidia GPUs, so I am going to get a gtx 680.
Crazy Rig
(17 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsGraphics
i7 920 D0 4.1ghz HT Asus Rampage III Extreme Zotac GTX 660 Powercolor 7870 Tahiti LE CF 
GraphicsRAMHard DriveOptical Drive
Asus 6970 + 6950 (6970shader) CF Patriot Viper Extreme 3x2gb 2000mhz Kingston Hyperlink 120GB SSD, Crucial M4 64GB S... LG dvd writer 
OSMonitorMonitorKeyboard
Window 8 Professional DELL U3011 A01 DELL U2313HM X3 Steelseries 7G 
PowerCaseMouseMouse Pad
Seasonic 850 Silver Corsair Obsidian 650D Logitech G9X Steel Series QCK 
Audio
Asus Xonar ST 
  hide details  
Crazy Rig
(17 items)
 
  
CPUMotherboardGraphicsGraphics
i7 920 D0 4.1ghz HT Asus Rampage III Extreme Zotac GTX 660 Powercolor 7870 Tahiti LE CF 
GraphicsRAMHard DriveOptical Drive
Asus 6970 + 6950 (6970shader) CF Patriot Viper Extreme 3x2gb 2000mhz Kingston Hyperlink 120GB SSD, Crucial M4 64GB S... LG dvd writer 
OSMonitorMonitorKeyboard
Window 8 Professional DELL U3011 A01 DELL U2313HM X3 Steelseries 7G 
PowerCaseMouseMouse Pad
Seasonic 850 Silver Corsair Obsidian 650D Logitech G9X Steel Series QCK 
Audio
Asus Xonar ST 
  hide details  
post #339 of 679
Quote:
Originally Posted by jtom320 View Post

That's why you got such great OC's you have the low voltage model. Wish I had it but I'm ok being in the middle. Way better then my absolutely awful 2500k.

 

Oh absolutely, it does look like XFX is binning the Black Editions, not just flashing them with a "cool" bios.

Dead Space IV
(18 items)
 
   
CPUMotherboardGraphicsGraphics
Intel i7 3770K Gigabyte GA-Z77X-UD5H Geforce GTX 690 Geforce GTX 690 
RAMHard DriveOptical DriveOS
G.Skill RipjawX OCZ Vertex III (Max IOPS Edition) LG Blu-Ray RW Windows 8 Professional Plus 
MonitorKeyboardPowerCase
Acer GD235Hz Razer Marauder (SC2) Antec HCP 1200W CaseLabs M10 
MouseMouse PadAudioOther
Cybort R.A.T. 7 Razer Goliathus  Asus Xonar Essence STX Beyerdynamics DT990 Premium  
OtherOther
4x Seagate 1TB Barracuda 7200.12 2x Seagate 2TB Barracuda LP 5900 
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
Intel i7 3615QM Macbook Pro 2012 - Retina Chipset GeForce GT 650M 8GB DDR3L 1600 MHz 
Hard DriveOSMonitorCase
Apple/Samsung SSD Mountain Lion OSX 1.8.0.2 2880x1800 Macbook Pro 2012 15" 
MouseMouse Pad
Cyborg R.A.T. 7 Goliathus 
  hide details  
Dead Space IV
(18 items)
 
   
CPUMotherboardGraphicsGraphics
Intel i7 3770K Gigabyte GA-Z77X-UD5H Geforce GTX 690 Geforce GTX 690 
RAMHard DriveOptical DriveOS
G.Skill RipjawX OCZ Vertex III (Max IOPS Edition) LG Blu-Ray RW Windows 8 Professional Plus 
MonitorKeyboardPowerCase
Acer GD235Hz Razer Marauder (SC2) Antec HCP 1200W CaseLabs M10 
MouseMouse PadAudioOther
Cybort R.A.T. 7 Razer Goliathus  Asus Xonar Essence STX Beyerdynamics DT990 Premium  
OtherOther
4x Seagate 1TB Barracuda 7200.12 2x Seagate 2TB Barracuda LP 5900 
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
Intel i7 3615QM Macbook Pro 2012 - Retina Chipset GeForce GT 650M 8GB DDR3L 1600 MHz 
Hard DriveOSMonitorCase
Apple/Samsung SSD Mountain Lion OSX 1.8.0.2 2880x1800 Macbook Pro 2012 15" 
MouseMouse Pad
Cyborg R.A.T. 7 Goliathus 
  hide details  
post #340 of 679
Thread Starter 
Check out OBR's 3dmark 11 xtreme score, seems like hes purposly clocking the AMD lower (Why is everybody avoiding clock per clock) so it loses by a hair.. What would have made more sense is to run clock per clock, and reveal the REAL truth. not to mention, i have a feeling that the MSI isnt as loud as he makes it out to be.

http://www.obr-hardware.com/2012/03/best-oced-radeon-hd-7970-lightning-vs.html

Also note that the CPU score and combined score for the AMD is also lower.

The error in 3Dmark11 xtreme scores is around +-50 points overall, i have noticed this running many tests for 3dmark11 in my own review. So despite the clock difference, these cards are literally within error clock per clock, in 3dmark 11. (a benchmark that at first glance shows nvidia much further ahead when comparing stock 1100 mhz for gtx 680 vs stock 925 mhz for 7970)

Also he doesnt show the temperature of the gtx 680, he hides it in the msi afterburner screenshot. I am guessing ocd it is much hotter than the 7970, in accordance with all reviewers, despite the much lower power draw.
Edited by polyzp - 3/25/12 at 1:00pm
    
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
AMD FX 8150 - 4.90 ghz  GIGABYTE GA-990FXA-UD7 (Rev. 1.1) XFX 6990 + Accelero Twin Turbo 6990 cooler 24/7... 8192 MB - OC 1988 9-9-9-24-1T Team Xtreem 
Hard DriveOSPowerCase
240 GB Revodrive 3 X2 Windows 7 SP1 1000 W OCZ ZX series - 80 Gold HAF 932 - Windy Tunnel - 22 Fans 
  hide details  
    
CPUMotherboardGraphicsRAM
AMD FX 8150 - 4.90 ghz  GIGABYTE GA-990FXA-UD7 (Rev. 1.1) XFX 6990 + Accelero Twin Turbo 6990 cooler 24/7... 8192 MB - OC 1988 9-9-9-24-1T Team Xtreem 
Hard DriveOSPowerCase
240 GB Revodrive 3 X2 Windows 7 SP1 1000 W OCZ ZX series - 80 Gold HAF 932 - Windy Tunnel - 22 Fans 
  hide details  
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: Graphics Cards - General
This thread is locked  
Overclock.net › Forums › Graphics Cards › Graphics Cards - General › 7970 vs GTX 680 - Who is the real KING? UPDATE: 7970 ~8% better clock per clock