Quote:
Wow. It oc's well.Originally Posted by Arizonian 
On 3DMark11 and Heaven benchmarks I can run them independantly. GPU #2 does better than GPU #1 for me.
In games I need to sync them or I get lines across the game. However when I look at max Core clocks achieved even when synced GPU #2 does 26 Mhz better.
So far my stable over clock testing thus far is Base 1145 MHz Core and 1552 MHz Memory gaming. Max GPU Boost on Core GPU #1 1175 MHz and GPU #2 1201 MHz. So the dynamic over clocking on the two GPU's differ.

On 3DMark11 and Heaven benchmarks I can run them independantly. GPU #2 does better than GPU #1 for me.
In games I need to sync them or I get lines across the game. However when I look at max Core clocks achieved even when synced GPU #2 does 26 Mhz better.
So far my stable over clock testing thus far is Base 1145 MHz Core and 1552 MHz Memory gaming. Max GPU Boost on Core GPU #1 1175 MHz and GPU #2 1201 MHz. So the dynamic over clocking on the two GPU's differ.
Quote:
If you enable range enhancement, the core limit becomes 1850Mhz, with the memory limit becoming 2750Mhz.Quote:
Must be a pretty neat trick, considering it doesn't look any different. Originally Posted by PrincetonM 
AMD has compromised benchmarks like this with their built in tessellation driver cheat that is enabled by default. "AMD Optimised" is auto enable through the Catalyst and it boost fps in games as well as benchmarks. When the GTX 680 released, 99.9% of reviews that ran Heaven Bench had the GTX 680 on top by a couple hundred points. I suspect the users on this forum are completely turning off or toning down tessellation in AMD Catalyst to boost their scores. The samething happens in 3DMark11. The top 100 is filled with i7-3960K Quad 7970's bench runs with Tessellation turned off. Good thing futuremark caught on and invalidated the scores when you look at the actual bench run.
GTX 680 overclock or not is the fastest single gpu on the market until HD 8000 or GK110.
Carry on with your unfair unbalanced bench "competition"

AMD has compromised benchmarks like this with their built in tessellation driver cheat that is enabled by default. "AMD Optimised" is auto enable through the Catalyst and it boost fps in games as well as benchmarks. When the GTX 680 released, 99.9% of reviews that ran Heaven Bench had the GTX 680 on top by a couple hundred points. I suspect the users on this forum are completely turning off or toning down tessellation in AMD Catalyst to boost their scores. The samething happens in 3DMark11. The top 100 is filled with i7-3960K Quad 7970's bench runs with Tessellation turned off. Good thing futuremark caught on and invalidated the scores when you look at the actual bench run.
GTX 680 overclock or not is the fastest single gpu on the market until HD 8000 or GK110.
Carry on with your unfair unbalanced bench "competition"




















