Quote:
Originally Posted by Conspiracy 
sorry for not being overly specific considering both of those cameras are out of OP's price range and any normal camera user that buys either of those cameras for professional application rather than the typical "im rich and bored users" will not likely use the AF in video anyway. but since you are sooo critical then yes they do offer AF but its not very practical to shoot with a DSLR handheld without at least a shoulder rig or tripod with follow focus for the MF users and some AF to be even more correct...

sorry for not being overly specific considering both of those cameras are out of OP's price range and any normal camera user that buys either of those cameras for professional application rather than the typical "im rich and bored users" will not likely use the AF in video anyway. but since you are sooo critical then yes they do offer AF but its not very practical to shoot with a DSLR handheld without at least a shoulder rig or tripod with follow focus for the MF users and some AF to be even more correct...

Hmm, it strikes me that you're the one being rather critical. My reply largely had to do with a camcorder being a more effective solution for the average, read non-professional user, as it's easier to use. You chose to rip apart a piece of that reply by asserting that expensive DSLRs do not have continuous auto-focus in video mode, because that is a consumer feature. Well, the example of the D4 and D800 is to demonstrate this fallacy to you, not suggest to the OP that he should go out and buy one of them instead of a camcorder.







