Quote:
Originally Posted by
Metric 
Quote:
AMD's upcoming "Trinity" family of desktop and mobile accelerated processing units (APUs) will use up to four x86-64 cores based on the company's newest CPU architecture, codenamed "Piledriver". AMD conservatively estimated performance/clock improvements over current-generation "Bulldozer" architecture, with Piledriver. Citavia put next-generation A10-5800K, and A8-4500M "Trinity" desktop and notebook APUs, and pitted them against several currently-launched processors, from both AMD and Intel.
via
Original English source, with further details on methodology -
http://citavia.blog.de/2012/04/08/trinity-piledriver-performance-13460109/
Sadly the guy from the original source has his calculated % in a strange way (not one of correct right ways, or maybe those numbers are for something else?)
Integer It is actually clock for clock 17% better than bulldozer (5800K vs 8150), and that is without L3 cache.
FP is 13% better.
Worked out by (numbers for 8150 vs 5800K, clock for clock):
INT: 1978.6/100 = 19.786
2327.4/19.786 = 117.6
117.6 - 100 =
17.6%
FP: 619.5/100 = 6.195
701.2/6.19 = 113.18
113.2 - 100 =
13.2 %
Which is actually really impressive, wow, if this performance comes true ill probably be looking to upgrade.
Edited by Alchemist07 - 4/10/12 at 8:41am