Originally Posted by Lettuceman
So, if the game has limited controls, and limited graphic options, but it runs fine with no issues, and plays as intended then its a poor game?
If the gameplay is awesome, and the game looks fine, why is it a poor game?
People hardly ever think about what they type when it comes to the many pitchforks and torches situations of OCN.
I still dont even believe the single Famitsu source that says that apparently the game is locked to 720p and 30fps, especially when the Famitsu source never once mentions "720p" or "30fps".
All that is said is that there will be no change to resolution and something related to 60 fps. Even if they are saying it wont be 60fps, since when is "not 60" the direct equivalent of "locked to 30"?
Not to mention that Japanese is hardly a language that is directly translatable to English.
"No change to resolution" could mean that they are not adding hi-res texture packs for PCs that can handle mega visuals like Crytek/DICE did for Crysis 2 and Battlefield 3.
Using this translator
, proves the lack of direct translation ability perfectly as this one states:
There be not a change in definition
I just sincerely wish a forum focused on scientifically proving testing methods and theories before determining that X is indeed X, could have the patience to stop running around like a herd of sheep screaming "rabble rabble rabble" every time some site/blog/forum post says something geared specifically to turn them into said herd of screaming sheep.