Quote:
Originally Posted by Subcutaneous 
That's the whole point of my above edit, the i5 2500k didn't yield any additional FPS in the situations where I was below 60(even when overclocked) so it was like, how is this expenditure helping me?(answer: it's not)
I agree Tomshardware is an excellent point of reference and I like to use that website to learn about component speed and their relative inter dependencies. But I am gaming on a 1680X1050 monitor and the GTX 480 is a bit overkill for that resolution, so it really does make sense, I see 60+ almost all the time even with settings maxed.
Edit: Sorry didn't notice the OS requirement, but there was that one post linking to like 30$ windows. That's pretty cheap. They could also just slap the windows 8 beta on there(free download), I'm sure with a little tweaking it runs games well enough.

That's the whole point of my above edit, the i5 2500k didn't yield any additional FPS in the situations where I was below 60(even when overclocked) so it was like, how is this expenditure helping me?(answer: it's not)
I agree Tomshardware is an excellent point of reference and I like to use that website to learn about component speed and their relative inter dependencies. But I am gaming on a 1680X1050 monitor and the GTX 480 is a bit overkill for that resolution, so it really does make sense, I see 60+ almost all the time even with settings maxed.
Edit: Sorry didn't notice the OS requirement, but there was that one post linking to like 30$ windows. That's pretty cheap. They could also just slap the windows 8 beta on there(free download), I'm sure with a little tweaking it runs games well enough.
So when you game on a higher resolution you need a better CPU???




















i am just giving an example of what you can do with that money. iam not saying you should get the same specs, maybe you can pull it off getting a better PC
